Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

H.R. 6615....(Bill Introduced to Congress moves GITMO terrorists to Supreme Court Building!)
govtrack.us ^ | 7/24/08 | Rep. Louis Gohmert

Posted on 07/29/2008 1:51:51 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6615

To provide for the transport of the enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court will be able to more effectively micromanage the detainees by holding them on the Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 24, 2008

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL

To provide for the transport of the enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court will be able to more effectively micromanage the detainees by holding them on the Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Giving Inmate Terrorists More Opportunities (GITMO) Act of 2008’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion styled Boumediene v. Bush on June 12, 2008.

(2) Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the court’s majority opinion, held that foreign terrorism suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba have constitutional rights to challenge their detention in United States courts.

(3) This is an obvious effort on the part of the Supreme Court to micromanage the detainment and disposition of detainees in the War on Terror who are dedicated to destroying innocent people and the American way of life.

(4) The United States Supreme Court clearly needs increased opportunity to oversee the handling of the enemy combatants, as it has seen fit to take a greater role in managing the Global War on Terror, which is a duty previously exercised by the Executive Branch.

(5) There can be no better way for the United States Supreme Court to exercise its new self-appointed war powers than to house the prisoners whom it has taken a greater role in overseeing.

SEC. 3. TRANSPORTATION AND DETAINMENT OF ENEMY COMBATANTS.

(a) Transportation- The Secretary of Defense shall immediately transport all enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court shall hold the prisoners on the Court grounds, confined by adequate fencing.

(b) Shelter on Supreme Court Building Grounds- The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with Justice Anthony Kennedy, the author of the majority opinion in Boumediene v. Bush, is directed to provide shelter for the detainees outside the United States Supreme Court building, but on the building grounds. The Secretary of Defense shall provide guards to watch over the prisoners and shall implement a system to ensure that the prisoners receive the appropriate amount of food and water. Should the detainees need the use of restroom facilities, they shall use the facilities inside the United States Supreme Court building. The Chief Justice, if the Chief Justice so chooses, may perform the duties of Justice Anthony Kennedy under this subsection.

(c) Guard Duty- If any of the nine Supreme Court justices desire at any time to stand guard over the prisoners, or to provide the prisoners with their meals or water, or both, then the justices shall be permitted to perform these functions whenever they want.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT.

If either the Secretary of Defense or any justice of the Supreme Court refuses to carry out their duties under this Act, then their respective department or court shall receive funding for the next fiscal year at half the level of funding appropriated for the current fiscal year, or until such time as the Supreme Court no longer desires to micromanage the prisoners who have sworn to destroy our way of life.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; enemycombatant; gitmo; scotus; war
A Republican has introduced a bill into Congress that will move the scum of GITMO over to where Anthony Kennedy and David Souter can hang out with them. BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
1 posted on 07/29/2008 1:51:52 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
A great portion of the bill:

(3) [The recent ruling regarding Gitmo detainees] is an obvious effort on the part of the Supreme Court to micromanage the detainment and disposition of detainees in the War on Terror who are dedicated to destroying innocent people and the American way of life.

(4) The United States Supreme Court clearly needs increased opportunity to oversee the handling of the enemy combatants, as it has seen fit to take a greater role in managing the Global War on Terror, which is a duty previously exercised by the Executive Branch.

2 posted on 07/29/2008 1:54:31 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Ruh-roh -— looks like a “contempt of Supreme court” citation could be in order for this guy...


3 posted on 07/29/2008 1:55:14 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (SPAM: best in the can and in sammiches -- not for use on computers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

This is my Rep. haha! This is great.


4 posted on 07/29/2008 1:55:18 PM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Show prep! LOLOL


5 posted on 07/29/2008 1:55:38 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Love it...


6 posted on 07/29/2008 1:56:48 PM PDT by Edgerunner (At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

7 posted on 07/29/2008 1:56:56 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

Contempt? He is a legislator introducing a bill into Congress. There is no contempt there...just a man trying to pass a law.


8 posted on 07/29/2008 1:57:54 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: federal

It Is About Time!!!!!!! Balls in the halls.


9 posted on 07/29/2008 1:59:01 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

OMG! This is awesome! Is it really true? If it is it is awesome!


10 posted on 07/29/2008 2:00:33 PM PDT by GloriaJane (http://www.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal

Mine, too! Hip, hip, hooray for Texas!


11 posted on 07/29/2008 2:01:34 PM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Don’t get me wrong — I LOVE THIS!!!

It’s just that it’s not a good idea to mock a body that can make up its own laws and then rule on their constitutionality. I’ll be they’d find a way to whack his peepee if this were to miraculously pass...


12 posted on 07/29/2008 2:02:40 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (SPAM: best in the can and in sammiches -- not for use on computers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

VP Cheney came and held a fundraiser for/with him when he first ran - I believe it was to oust max sandlin.


13 posted on 07/29/2008 2:03:19 PM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal; Grammy; proud_yank; jazusamo; Flycatcher; gardengirl; george76; SJackson; Just A Nobody; ..

Congratulations. Wish I had one like this!!!


14 posted on 07/29/2008 2:06:10 PM PDT by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

This is good!


15 posted on 07/29/2008 2:07:57 PM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Please God, let this be real, and then let it PASS!!!!!!!!!!! Whoo Hoo!


16 posted on 07/29/2008 2:11:12 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Surely Justice Souter has room for a couple dozen of the little darlings at his home in NH.
17 posted on 07/29/2008 2:13:47 PM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I believe this falls under the umbrella of "illustrating absurdity by being absurd..."

Rush Limbaugh would be proud.

This is freaking hilarious! :-)

18 posted on 07/29/2008 2:29:13 PM PDT by smedley64 (UHbUHmUH- The incoherent candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Love it love it.......


19 posted on 07/29/2008 2:38:36 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

A man with some courage.

Love it.


20 posted on 07/29/2008 2:46:12 PM PDT by Grammy (Obama worked for 143 days as a Senator before deciding he was qualified to be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grammy

I LOVE IT!!!


21 posted on 07/29/2008 2:49:13 PM PDT by Judges Gone Wild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner; All
In these times of Republicans pandering to the idiocy of the left, I have decided to start giving what I will call the BB Award--earned by the merit of not succumbing to the pathetic socialism espoused by liberals. Just because someone wins a BB Award once does not make them an all-out conservative, but it does recognize them for their achievement in at least one area.

BB AWARD

Louie Gohmert of Texas: A Conservative Challenging Liberals on the Supreme Court!


22 posted on 07/29/2008 3:02:42 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; corbie; Fiddlstix; Rick_Michael; Man50D; The Spirit Of Allegiance; Waryone; ...
VERY nice! PING!!

Photobucket

Please FReepmail to be added to the Congress Watch ping list.

23 posted on 07/29/2008 3:05:17 PM PDT by Politicalmom (I've left the Grand Ol' Plantation. / GOP '08,- NO Soup for YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Great bill. Time to call my Congress critter and request that she support it.


24 posted on 07/29/2008 4:07:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (Drill or get off the Hill. ... call Nancy Pelosi @ 202 - 225 - 0100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal
This is my Rep

You lucky dude! He is almost worth moving to Texas for.

25 posted on 07/29/2008 4:16:43 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This was so cute that I just had to double check via Thomas that the bill was real. Yep, it's there
26 posted on 07/29/2008 4:27:09 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
If either the Secretary of Defense or any justice of the Supreme Court refuses to carry out their duties under this Act, then their respective department or court shall receive funding for the next fiscal year at half the level of funding appropriated for the current fiscal year, or until such time as the Supreme Court no longer desires to micromanage the prisoners who have sworn to destroy our way of life.

The Constitution does not allow Congress to cut the pay of judges. On the other hand, I think the traffic courts on the Bridge to Nowhere could probably benefit from some highly-paid judges. Perhaps Souter, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Breyer should be put in charge.

27 posted on 07/29/2008 9:32:17 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
The Constitution does not allow Congress to cut the pay of judges.

Where in the Constitution is Congress' power of the purse removed in regard to the judiciary?

28 posted on 07/30/2008 1:45:55 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Congressman Billybob

Kennedy deserves to be wearing orange trousers.

Anthony.

And Ted.


29 posted on 07/30/2008 6:27:40 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

He is a former judge, too.


30 posted on 07/31/2008 5:00:19 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
19. H.R.6615 : To provide for the transport of the enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, D.C., where the United States Supreme Court will be able to more effectively micromanage the detainees by holding them on the Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] (introduced 7/24/2008) Cosponsors (None) Committees: House Armed Services; House Judiciary Latest Major Action: 7/24/2008 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

I believe he is a former judge, too.

31 posted on 07/31/2008 5:03:31 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

This move could clear up a lot of the global criticism of Gitmo..... but I think they should relocate the SuperMax pen to Alert or Eureka.

That way we wouldn’t have to worry about a fence, security issues would be down 80 percent!


32 posted on 09/12/2008 1:31:36 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson