Posted on 08/05/2008 4:41:40 AM PDT by Neville72
But who cares?! The battle is for the middle voters and they are not under the Obama Zombie influence.
What does Slick know and when did he know it? :)
STOP IT!!!!! REPEAT THIS 20X! Hiltlery needs the Bambi cultists and blacks and would lose a fair percentage of them if he is not "The One", for any reason whatsoever.
While I still think it is an interesting question as to why Obama won't produce a real birth certificate, statements such as the one quoted above seem to me to disqualify this entire article. By now it seems known that a son was born to a Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama from a birth announcement in an August 1961 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser.
I suppose that this announcement could be a fake too, but it was found by someone who would have appeared to have a motive not to find it. Until and unless reasonable doubt can be cast upon this announcement though, people who suggest that Obama was not born as Obama in Hawaii will look pretty foolish to me. ML/NJ
In the coming days. Would have been a story if he had done that now.
Amazing. I just watched that, and it’s a classic Clintonian move. He just threw it in there, casually, out of the blue. I thought they had truly given up on this cycle, but they must be up to something.
bump
Then you shouldn’t have any problem showing us the proof. Why hold back?
Þ
For that answer, I refer you to the Law of Nations, which is contained in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10 of the US Constitution.
BOOK I. OF NATIONS CONSIDERED IN THEMSELVES
CHAP. XIX. OF OUR NATIVE COUNTRY, AND SEVERAL THINGS THAT RELATE TO IT.
§ 215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.
It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed.(59) By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; I say "of itself," for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also.
The citizenship of the father determines the citizenship of the child, so Obama is NOT a natural born citizen according to Constitutional law.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
they may only assume the office if they are eligible.
...in his only public statement in two months.
Hysteria in the street. I can see it now.
Either way this goes, it is not going to be good.
This may be a whitey tape. But if my paranoid mind is right, I wonder if the “whitey” tape wasn’t put out there to make anything seem ridiculous that is brought up. I hope that makes sense.
That’s because you haven’t read the whole story.
Barack Obama was adopted by his stepfather, Lolo Soteoro.
His bio father is Barack Obama. His legal father is Lolo Soteoro or he couldn’t have gone to school in Indonesia. Read Texas Darling’s blogs by Judah Somebody. I know it seems as if you have walked in the middle of a conversation and it doesn’t make sense. But seriously, the points Judah brings up (he is a historian and has research thoroughly on the times he was living in Indonesia) is really interesting.
I can understand his original birth certificate being sealed, and it being replaced with one with his adoptive, Indonesian father. But in that case, why not just pull out his original birth certificate that he claims to have? It would seem odd for him to have an embarrassment to hide there—as well as the Indonesian issue.
It is strange that he would have described down to the color the original birth certificate he said in one of his fictionalized autobiographies that he recalled seeing. My guess is he was plotting an eligibility cover up even back then. He never had such a birth certificate, for whatever reason, and Hawaii officially has only his adoptive one now.
Meaning that if you were alive in the 1700’s prior to the Constitution being written, you could run. After that, you had to be born here or born to a citizen at least 21. Right?
Meaning that if you were alive in the 1700’s prior to the Constitution being written, you could run. After that, you had to be born here or born to a citizen at least 21. Right?
Because in Hawaii, the original birth certificate is destroyed when reissued for adoption.
The dual citizenship is the issue I think.
"Grasping at straws" is the first thing that springs to mind...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.