Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Edwards Love-Child Old Media Doesn't Want You to See (Photos)
Gawker.com ^ | 8/6/08

Posted on 08/06/2008 8:50:44 AM PDT by LdSentinal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: LdSentinal

Obama: "I hope they don't dig too deep into my affairs. Digging up that forged birth certificate was bad enough." Edwards: "Hey, I got a couple of good numbers for you."

41 posted on 08/06/2008 9:07:53 AM PDT by IbJensen (Ali Bama isn't going to make it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

The child had no choice in any of this and probably will suffer some later on. (who knows in this sick world nowadays)
I hold the Mother completely responsible. I think she wanted to out him and got her friend(s) to help her. He was already paying her so why else. He certainly wasn’t going to have a press conference.
As much as I detest the politics of his wife, I do have sympathy for her and their children. If she knew about it, then she gets no sympathy as her own children will be more hurt because they are older and understand. School kids can be cruel. JMO


42 posted on 08/06/2008 9:07:59 AM PDT by MarineMom613 (My son is My Hero!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

But he WAS at the hotel where the baby and mommy were at...at 2 something AM. That’s indisputable. If he were MY husband I’d want some answers to that.


43 posted on 08/06/2008 9:08:01 AM PDT by queenkathy (I will never give up and I will never give in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Huck

There are 3 innocent children mixed up in this- the two IVF babies Elizabeth Edwards produced for John by flooding her 50 year old body with hormones (to what effect on her health?), and now this one,

Public figures give up their rights to privacy and usually they and their associate enjoy the power wealth and privilge that result. But when their misbehavior drags them down, it drags down thier friends and families, too. That is what makes up human interest stories. You might as well argue to keep crime stories or anything that embarrasses anyone out of the “news”-

so what’s left? Well, for examples of sanitized feel-good “news” you might check out official wire services of Iran and North Korea.

BTW, kudos to the National Enquirer. They were also the first, and lone outlet, to tell the world about Jesse Jackson’s “love child” and expose his hypocritical lifestyle.


44 posted on 08/06/2008 9:08:08 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble

Well said. Thanks.


45 posted on 08/06/2008 9:08:12 AM PDT by Honor above all (I'm only here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I wish that someone would go back in the archives and dig up a photo of Bubba Clinton’s little black baby that was kickin’ around the internet during the Lewinski scandle...The kid looked just like the Bubba.....It would be nice to see him now, the little guy must be 11 or 12..I wonder if he still looks like the Bubba.....


46 posted on 08/06/2008 9:09:17 AM PDT by Old Phone Man (ks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mriguy67
why was he still running for pres if he knew this was going on?

He's a terrific lawyer who could sue his way out of any predicament.

47 posted on 08/06/2008 9:09:32 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Plants are people too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

edwards isn’t really a liberal. he’s a politician who says what it takes to get elected.


48 posted on 08/06/2008 9:09:56 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Øbamuh uh uh uh uh uh uh ummmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble

Perhaps in a “golden age” of decorum (that probably never existed):

The Silky Pony would be privately confronted with the story, and told that either he could quietly stay in the background or the story would be publicized. Then it was up to him to decide whether the public honor of his family was worth more than his ambition.

Yeah, I’m sure that golden age never really existed....


49 posted on 08/06/2008 9:10:13 AM PDT by henkster (Politics is the art of telling a bigger and more believable lie more often than your opponent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

I agree. I am surprised many here are criticizing Edwards for the choice. Life is Good!


50 posted on 08/06/2008 9:10:20 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

No “we” do not look silly believing a National Enquirer story because they have a proven track record of going after politicians the MSM won’t touch. ie, Jesse Jackson,


51 posted on 08/06/2008 9:10:23 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"It's just extra sad when there's a kid involved who didn't have free will in the situation. "

And it's really sad when a married man can't keep his pecker in his pants. If Edwards had any morals at all, he'd have been home with his cancer-stricken wife and two children, instead of running for public office and diddling with the groupies. If this story is true, he'd be doing everyone, including that baby, a great service by stepping forward and taking responsibility, instead of running and hiding from the press.

52 posted on 08/06/2008 9:11:54 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

Don’t ask the question if you really can’t handle the answer. Yes or No as to intent in your mind he is already guilty.


53 posted on 08/06/2008 9:12:42 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Awww. It looks JUST like him...


54 posted on 08/06/2008 9:14:29 AM PDT by weegee (Hi there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honor above all

It’s sad a child involved and children he has with wife BUT after what the media and libs did to the toe tappin Sen. Craig and remember the Sen Livingston I think who stepped down because he had a kid out of wed lock. Edwards is a gutless piece of crap who is the king of hypocrisy. I always wondered what kind of couple who faces cancer and have small children are still driven by power instead of stepping out of the public eye and just being a family. Whatever it is if this was a repub there wouldn’t be any keeping it “private” as they say-it would be all day every day coverage and it wouldn’t matter if a sick wife and children involved.


55 posted on 08/06/2008 9:16:03 AM PDT by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

I have a problem with conservatives making their case with something from a supermarket tabloid.


56 posted on 08/06/2008 9:16:06 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Øbamuh uh uh uh uh uh uh ummmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Apparently this isn’t as important as a toe tapper when it comes to discussing the Culture of Corruption.


57 posted on 08/06/2008 9:16:29 AM PDT by weegee (Hi there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
The National Enquirer has published photos of former political person John Edwards with a baby.

Would that be the John Edwards that was honored as "Father of the Year" last year...LOL

58 posted on 08/06/2008 9:17:13 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

59 posted on 08/06/2008 9:17:19 AM PDT by Coffee200am ("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears..."/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

Don’t get me wrong: I believe the story.

It’s just that the photo is well-nigh useless.


60 posted on 08/06/2008 9:17:31 AM PDT by Petronski (The God of Life will condemn the Chinese government. Gao li means GULAG.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson