Posted on 08/08/2008 12:00:48 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
Don’t like Edwards anyway, the real hypocrisy here is that edwards absolutely used his wife’s cancer and his devotion to her in an effort to save his presidential campaign. Of course, as with Elliot Spitzer it’s hard to know how much the wife’s own ambition was involved.
So what’s the deal? He had the affair but didn’t love her. Does that soften the blow to say he didn’t love her? But he’s also saying that it’s impossible that he’s the father of the baby becaue the affair ended before that. See where the story goes, could be interesting.
It is really tragic for a family to be drug through the mud so publicly. Prayers for the Edwards family to work this out in the best interest of the children.
The real losers here are the Edwards’ children...They have to deal with their mom dying of cancer and their dad cheating on their dying mom...want to bet they don’t see much of him when they are grown up?
The LA TIMES has repeated not covered this story, saying it was heresay, etc. They even mentioned why they wouldnt cover any of the incident in their new “blogs”
Even among the libbies, it has raised eyebrows.
I suppose their idea of utopia is a land where all needs are taken care of so they can devote themselves to full time satisfaction of their desires.
No wonder they're sympathetic to Islamic fundamentalists. They both have the same ultimate fantasy.
So he admits that he paid her over $100k to travel with him and that they had sex. But he insists that this ‘affair’ - I’d call it an ‘arrangement’ - ended over a year ago and that the kid’s not his and that he has not been supporting her. But then he admits he visited her and the kid in a hotel room booked for just that purpose just a couple of weeks ago.
I’m laughing as I type this.
hilarious...
Will he be asking for a consultation with Rev Jackson on how to handle baby daddy issues?
I agree, it will be interesting to see how the MSM finally address this. Are we in for “all men cheat ...”. He states he didn’t love her. The baby is Not his, he just passed her around to the rest of his staff. Sure says like he respects her. But lets first and foremost, follow the money...
The MSM is not giving you enough of this?
LOL.
And I'm sure that ABC asked him about his midnight trip a few days ago to a hotel to meet up with his "former" flame. I mean really. Does he actually expect us to believe this stuff?
“Geez, read ya’ National Enquirer will ya? That’s the
only paper that tells the TRUTH!” —Archie Bunker
So, news released just after Rush goes off the air for
the weekend! Reminds me of when Jocelyn Elders resigned
(”Perhaps masturbation is something that ought to be
taught”) and the news broke about 3 pm on a Friday. Too
late for Rush to deal with (though Boston’s Howie Carr dove into it. He’s talking about Edwards now. howiecarr.com )
I’m just amazed the affair was with a woman.
Looks like our straight-arrow media publicizes embarassing news about democrats just as soon as they are told they’re permitted to! I wonder how you anounce a 10 day old “breaking” story? Naturally since he doesn’t “love her”, it makes what he did to his wife perfectly OK. Another class democrat with designs on the White House. Will the supply never end?
LOL. Compared to Bill Clinton he is a saint.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.