Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gang's All Here (Here our our misguided Senators)
http://www.senate.gov/ ^ | Aug 2008 | http://www.senate.gov/

Posted on 08/10/2008 7:06:23 PM PDT by Maelstorm

Here are the misguided Senators who joined the Gang of 10. Please let them know what you think of their actions. I've included their contact information and the press releases bragging about their participation in the gang of 10.


Sen. Lindsey Graham:

http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/ Email:http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.EmailSenatorGraham

Senator Graham Press Relases
Contact: Wes Hickman (202) 224-5972 or Kevin Bishop (864) 250-1417
Date: 08/01/2008

'Gang of 10' Introduces Bipartisan Energy Proposal

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) helped draft and signed on to a bipartisan energy proposal that enables our nation become more energy independent.

 

The proposal, New Energy Reform Act of 2008 from the group dubbed the ‘Gang of 10’, contains provisions on offshore drilling, spent nuclear fuel recycling, promotes new technologies and conservation, and requires the oil companies to pay fair market prices for oil leases and drilling rights.

 

“There is no greater problem facing average American’s and small business today than high fuel costs and our nation’s dependency on foreign oil, “said Graham.  “Our proposal is not perfect, but it is a bipartisan start on the road to a comprehensive energy strategy leading our nation to independence from foreign oil.  It will create new jobs from new technologies good for American wallets and our environment.  I am proud to be part of this bipartisan effort to address this serious problem.”

 


Sen. Saxby Chambliss

http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm
Email:http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.ContactForm&CFID=34008779&CFTOKEN=57501991

Chambliss, Isakson Unveil Bipartisan Plan to Reduce Energy Prices

Includes Domestic Exploration, Conservation, Consumer Tax Credits

August 1, 2008

WASHINGTON – At a news conference on Capitol Hill today, U.S. Senators Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., joined a bipartisan coalition – informally known as the “Gang of 10” – in unveiling a sweeping energy proposal to reduce gas prices, lessen our nation’s dependence on foreign oil, and strengthen America’s economy.
 
The comprehensive New Energy Reform Act of 2008 — better known as the “New Era”— calls for a focused effort to transition the nation’s motor vehicle fleets to fuels other than gasoline and diesel. To ease gas prices in the interim, the proposal includes significant conservation provisions, consumer tax credits, and responsible measures to increase domestic production.
 
 “I believe this effort epitomizes what the United States Senate is all about,” said Chambliss, who spearheaded the effort with Democratic colleague Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D.  “Nothing gets done in this body without 60 votes, and you don't get 60 votes without a true bipartisan effort.  This has been a cooperative effort on the part of all of 10 members. 

Sen. Johnny Isakson
 
http://isakson.senate.gov/
Email: http://isakson.senate.gov/contact.cfm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, August 1, 2008

Chambliss, Isakson Unveil Bipartisan Plan to Reduce Energy Prices
Includes Domestic Exploration, Conservation, Consumer Tax Credits

WASHINGTON – At a news conference on Capitol Hill today, U.S. Senators Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., joined a bipartisan coalition – informally known as the “Gang of 10” – in unveiling a sweeping energy proposal to reduce gas prices, lessen our nation’s dependence on foreign oil, and strengthen America’s economy.

The comprehensive New Energy Reform Act of 2008 — better known as the “New Era”— calls for a focused effort to transition the nation’s motor vehicle fleets to fuels other than gasoline and diesel. To ease gas prices in the interim, the proposal includes significant conservation provisions, consumer tax credits, and responsible measures to increase domestic production.


Sen. Bob Corker

http://corker.senate.gov/public/
Email: http://corker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.ContactMe

Corker in the News

CORKER, GANG OF 10 UNVEIL PLAN TO REDUCE ENERGY PRICES

New Energy Act of 2008 Press Conference

August 1, 2008

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) and the other nine members of the bipartisan coalition of senators known informally as the "Gang of 10" today unveiled a sweeping energy proposal to reduce gas prices, lessen our nation’s dependence on foreign oil, and strengthe... [continue]


Sen. John Thune

http://thune.senate.gov/public/
Email: http://thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Email

Press Releases    Press Office alt

Contact: Andi Fouberg
Phone: 202-224-2321
Email This
Print This
alt

Thune, Gang of 10 Unveil Bipartisan Plan to Reduce Energy Prices

-- Proposal Includes Four Year PTC Extension --
 
August 1st, 2008 - Washington, D.C. - Senator John Thune along with a bipartisan coalition of Senators - known informally as the "Gang of 10" - today unveiled a sweeping energy proposal, the New Energy Reform Act of 2008 (New ERA Act), which would reduce gas prices, lessen our nation's dependence on foreign oil, and strengthen America's economy.

"For weeks, I have been working with both Democrats and Republicans to put politics aside and come up with a comprehensive energy package that will reduce energy prices for the American people. The New Energy Reform Act of 2008 would increase domestic oil and natural gas production, extend the wind production tax credit for four years, transition American fuel consumption from fossil fuels to biofuels, increase conservation and launch an Apollo-like project to move America's cars and trucks to non-petroleum-based fuels.

 

 



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia; US: South Carolina; US: South Dakota; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 10; congress; drilling; drilllindseysbrain; energy; fragmeister; gang; idiots; of; ussenate
Here is our gang. It is about time they were disbanded. These guys are pretty reliable conservatives but they have really stepped in it trying to jump the gun with a bipartisan crap bill that could've been written by the Sierra club.

Read Below: As Kimberley Strassel writes, "The Sierra Club couldn't have penned it better. And so the Republican Five has potentially given antidrilling Democrats the political cover they need to neutralize energy through November. Sen. Obama was thrilled. He quickly praised the Gang's bipartisan spirit, and warmed up to a possible compromise. Of course, he means removing even the token drilling provisions now in the [Senate] bill.

1 posted on 08/10/2008 7:06:25 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

The effeminate gentleman from South Carolina ping.


2 posted on 08/10/2008 7:08:46 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; Politicalmom
Capital switchboard toll free numbers:

800-965-4701

800-828-0498

Let 'er rip! Congress critter ping!
3 posted on 08/10/2008 7:15:23 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Thank you for the links. These weasels sold out for their own political gain.

Keep supporting our congress heros that are still in Washington!!

We need a vote
Nazi Pelosi AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov

We need emergency session
President Bush comments@whitehouse.gov
202-456-1111

John Boehner invited McCain to join them
McCain needs to get his a$$ to Washington where he belongs
It will bring the much needed media attention
http://www.johnmccain.com/Contact/


4 posted on 08/10/2008 7:15:50 PM PDT by mouse1 (I'VE BEEN CALLED A REDNECK BIGOT AND I'M PROUD OF IT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Bump for Monday morning phone calls.

These people are beyond disgusting. Worse than the Dems IMO.


5 posted on 08/10/2008 7:18:55 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Thanks Senators!




6 posted on 08/10/2008 7:19:52 PM PDT by Son House ( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

They sold out for their own political gain undermining the hard work of John Boehner and others. They disgust me.


7 posted on 08/10/2008 7:22:00 PM PDT by mouse1 (I'VE BEEN CALLED A REDNECK BIGOT AND I'M PROUD OF IT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mouse1
To Pelosi:













From America
8 posted on 08/10/2008 7:23:51 PM PDT by Son House ( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

AKA as the Five Stooges, as so aptly described by Ms. Strassel.


9 posted on 08/10/2008 7:24:41 PM PDT by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Thanks for compiling this.

I hope y’all heard Saxby on Rush’s show stumbling around.

Unfrotunateky, Rush didn’t have enough time to nail him to the wall, but he did ask some “difficult” questions.\

BUMP!


10 posted on 08/10/2008 7:25:38 PM PDT by upchuck (Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. (nObama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Checkers; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; BILL_C; bnelson44; Clintonfatigued; ...
Thanks for the ping rab.

FReeper checkers has been calling Pandsey der F(r)agmeister. The shoe fits!


Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."

Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.

11 posted on 08/10/2008 7:28:11 PM PDT by upchuck (Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. (nObama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I hope y’all heard Saxby on Rush’s show stumbling around.

Heard it, or some of it. Wasn't convinced.

12 posted on 08/10/2008 7:29:11 PM PDT by sionnsar (Impeach Obama |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

I don’t understand what their “personal gain” could possibly be from this. They are from Conservative Sates.

Why did John McCain sit by and let Lady Lindsey do this? It hurts his campaign.


13 posted on 08/10/2008 7:30:10 PM PDT by no dems ("Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice...." Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The Obama Republicans, legislating to make Obama proud.


14 posted on 08/10/2008 7:32:58 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberalism is service to the self disguised as service to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

This outta get everyone in Freepville fired up for the week, from;

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121815293390922431.html?mod=todays_columnists

What they did was throw every vulnerable Democrat, and Mr. Obama, a life preserver.

That’s because the plan is a Democratic giveaway. New production on offshore federal lands is left to state legislatures, and then in only four coastal states. The regulatory hurdles are huge. And the bill bars drilling within 50 miles of the coast — putting off limits some of the most productive areas. Alaska’s oil-rich Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is still a no-go.

The highlight is instead $84 billion in tax credits, subsidies and federal handouts for alternative fuels and renewables. The Gang of 10 intends to pay for all this in part by raising taxes on . . . oil companies! The Sierra Club couldn’t have penned it better. And so the Republican Five has potentially given antidrilling Democrats the political cover they need to neutralize energy through November.

Sen. Obama was thrilled. He quickly praised the Gang’s bipartisan spirit, and warmed up to a possible compromise. Of course, he means removing even the token drilling provisions now in the bill. But he’s only too happy for the focus to remain on the Gang’s efforts, and in particular on the five Republicans providing his party its fig leaf.


15 posted on 08/10/2008 7:33:39 PM PDT by Son House ( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Everyone who cares needs to start wearing these sorry bastards out over this.CALL and call again and keep calling their offices.They will get the message.


16 posted on 08/10/2008 7:34:21 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouse1





17 posted on 08/10/2008 7:34:36 PM PDT by Son House ( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
I am so fed up with the arrogance of these "bi-partisan" groups thinking they can make all the decisions. We all have our own representatives from our states who have a dog in this fight too, and I'd be real happy if those arrogant pos, would just back off and do their job along with the ENTIRE House and Senate.

More than any of the others, I loathe Graham. I have an anger toward him like I've never known before. He's such a prissy little sissy. I wish he'd just get back in the corner and shut his mouth!! I think it was when he said he "would just tell those Bigots to shut their mouths." Suffice to say, God better help him if we should ever meet. LOL What an absolute jackass he is.

18 posted on 08/10/2008 7:42:36 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (A TAXPAYER VOTING FOR BARACK OBAMA IS LIKE A CHICKEN VOTING FOR COLONEL SANDERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Before I had any information other than Rush and the WSJ article, I called Senator Thune’s office and asked what the issues were. I was told by a staffer that there was no bill yet, however, based on this, contained in the press release,

“transition American fuel consumption from fossil fuels to biofuels, increase conservation and launch an Apollo-like project to move America’s cars and trucks to non-petroleum-based fuels”,

I will be calling again to suggest that the Senator who was and is a vocal proponent of corn gas supplement, should rethink the idea that we are going to be able to go to non-petroleum based fuels any time in the next fifty years for a significant number of vehicles.

I am particularly interested in trucks, trains, and airplanes and what makes him think other than smoke and mirrors that there is anything on over or within decades of the horizon that will meet the objective. The sentence from the press release is an envirodream of crack cocaine proportions.


19 posted on 08/10/2008 7:42:57 PM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

According to mealy-mouth Chambliss, they did it because they think any legislation is better than no legislation. At least he and Isakson are from my state, and have been hearing from me ever since. I am convinced, though, that they are so out of touch, the message may not get through. Chambliss was obviously blindsided by the rage, which just has to make you wonder. How on earth can ANYBODY be this insulated from the real world of conservative constiuents???


20 posted on 08/10/2008 7:59:52 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
hope y’all heard Saxby on Rush’s show stumbling around

Nothing like a soothing Southern drawl as you get a shiv to the back.

He and isakson are my Senators, and they BOTH received "nasty grams" from me over this latest (gave 'em hell last time they were talking of supporting ted kennedy's amnesty bill) f-up of their own doing.

THEY may be happy with being in the minority in perpetuity, but I'm not.

They better straighten up and fly right, or they'll pay at the polls (chambliss this time around).

Idiots.

21 posted on 08/10/2008 8:28:47 PM PDT by DocH (hussein and juan - what kind of choice is THAT? God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Ok... I got my flame retardant suit on....so fire away...
Just because theses Senators try to get “SOMETHING” going to help the American people they’re some sort of traitors?????? ...That used to be called “ STATEMANSHIP”

Hey folks in case you missed something because of the “ Message” that was sent to Republicans in the last elections we don’t control jack in the congress..
So what’s the big deal in trying to GET SOMETHING that will relieve the pump prices?????

I have spoken to Senator Graham in person and I am convinced he heard us last year...

Lets stop eating our own here...

Unless you want a “ The ONE” in the white house with a Rats congress..


22 posted on 08/10/2008 8:29:49 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Note to Robe.

See your own tagline.

We'll get NOWHERE as a party if we try being democrat-lite.

This "reaching across the aisle", to what amount to the "domestic enemies" we have sworn to defend against, has GOT TO STOP.

It is getting us NOWHERE because the dems idea of compromise is "Give us what we want, and we'll sh*t on you".

The only way to win a war, be it cultural, political, or whatever, is TOTAL VICTORY.

We were doing well in the battle over energy, with McCain finally speaking up and growing somewhat of a pair, and the great Conservatives in the house raising hell, that is, until this "gang of 5" republicans cut us off at the knees.

In most cases, the LESS politicians do, the better off we are. And in cases where something must be done that can only be done by government (which is, in reality, not very often), then Conservatives taking the lead and pushing hard on principle and conviction, WITHOUT compromise with liberal maggots, is the way to go.

23 posted on 08/10/2008 8:39:15 PM PDT by DocH (hussein and juan - what kind of choice is THAT? God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Robe

The bill/agreement gives both PETA and the ACLU veto power over any new drilling. It’s so larded down with regulations and restrictions, it would actually make it harder to get new oil. All this and more was covered in the Kimberley Strassel WSJ article Rush cited on Friday.


24 posted on 08/10/2008 8:42:54 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I am particularly dissappointed in Thune and Chambliss. I expect it from Graham. Corker is a little dissappointing.


25 posted on 08/10/2008 9:09:51 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; rabscuttle385; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; BILL_C; bnelson44; Clintonfatigued

Something about Lindsey makes me think when he says “Drill Here. Drill Now”, he’s looking back over his shoulder.


26 posted on 08/10/2008 10:49:58 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Checkers; All

It took a week for this to get out. As pointed out its the “gang of 10” proposal. I have the Investors Daily article linked,in my website http://www.theusmat.com/ along with a survey asking if Bush should veto this if this gets to that point. WSJ also blasted this idea.


27 posted on 08/11/2008 2:47:52 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Confront your favorite dem and ask em ..Hows the air in your tires ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Robe; DocH

Note to Rob, see your own tagline is right.

The people realise what is going on, and now for the sake of “civility and bipartisanship” or merely just to grab a headline, these 5 dotes (who should be zotted) have decided it is ok to throw the enemy the life preserver.

“The object of war, is not die for one’s country. NO! The object of war, is to make the other poor, dumb bastard, die for HIS COUNTRY!” -Gen. George S. Patton

If these Senators actually believed what we believed, then they’d be doing the exact same things that Mitch McConnel has done, and what the House Republicans have done. No, instead, these elitest snobs have decided that it is acceptable to stab us in the back, cut our legs off at the knees, slice off our arms, and make us look like the Black Knight who still wants to fight in Monty Python Search for the Holy Grail!

Statesmanship died when the socialists in Congress have long since lost their SWORN duty to uphold the Constitution!


28 posted on 08/11/2008 7:57:18 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("...If it moves, tax it, if it moves faster, regulate it, if it stops, subsidies it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Please explain how this proposed bill is better than the one Repubs in the House are trying to get a vote on.


29 posted on 08/11/2008 8:17:53 AM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouse1
They sold out for their own political gain

Politicians are, well... politicians, regardless of which side of the isle they sit on. We can be disgusted all we want - but the reality is, they would rather cover their own costs and investments. If that means being a traitor to their own "party", or stabbing good men in the back - they will do it.

But I am disgusted too....

30 posted on 08/11/2008 8:20:06 AM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I heard him, and I was not impressed.


31 posted on 08/11/2008 8:22:32 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

I contacted all three of them. Thanks.


32 posted on 08/11/2008 8:22:48 AM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

How many of these pukes are TRULY impacted by fuel costs? When was the last time any of them had to pay to fill up a gas tank out of their own pockets? For that matter, how many of them are impacted by the rapidly rising prices of consumer goods due to the high price of fuel and all the related scams tied too them (like ethanol)?


33 posted on 08/11/2008 8:25:06 AM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Where is a good 527 when we need one??????

PWposter.527.rinorooter.sm.C.jpg
34 posted on 08/11/2008 9:46:12 AM PDT by davidlachnicht ("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Anyone know the code for a senator's email address without having to go through the Internet form? It seems to me they try to generate mail through the Internet form so they can tell instantly if the writer is from their home state.
35 posted on 08/11/2008 12:32:58 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocH

Senator:

Why are you throwing the democrats and their nominee a life preserver? Why have you undercut the efforts of John McCain and the fine House Republicans that have actually made energy and oil an issue for this election? Is it really about being a statesmen and getting something done for the American people, or doing what they really want and just getting an up or down vote on the issue; which is lifting the ban on offshore oil production and ANWAR production? Also, haven’t you learned by now that the other side does not often play fair and by the same rules of bipartisanship that you seem to think still exists?

I would be all for reaching across the isle if the legislation is common sense, but as I understand this new “gang of 10” bill to be, it essentially allows the Sierra Club and other environmental extremist groups veto power over off shore drilling. How is this easing regulation to allow American access to American oil?

I am still suffering at the pump but worse yet, I see my fellow Americans and I sending our wealth over seas. Sharing is fine, as long as we are sharing opportunity. Allowing countries to join us in democracy is a good thing, and helping developing nations to foster that is good foreign policy, but sending 700 billion dollars over seas for energy has gone from impractical to unacceptable.

If you happen to remember what the great President Ronald Reagan said about the government’s view of the economy; “If it moves, tax it, if it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.”

If we follow this simple phrase, we can see that none of what is in the current compromise makes sense. The federal, state, and local governments take more money in taxes than the oil companies actually make (fuel excise tax). Next, we’ve told the oil companies where they can put a rig and where they can’t. Worse, when they are allowed to operate on the leased lands, they are faced with senseless lawsuits to stop them after they’ve done sensible environmental impact studies. Additionally, the federal government has been grabbing land for reserves and parks to prevent even greater access to the American People’s oil and natural gas deposits. Finally, we apply the third and final part of Reagan’s government view of the economy, whereby we subsidize the alternative energy industry with massive tax credits. If these were such viable solutions to solving our energy problem or the fake global warming problem, then surely they should be able to survive and thrive on their own merits.

If you want a simple solution to this problem, follow these steps and in this order:

1) More AMERICAN oil production, inclusive of refining capacity with a simple, no nonsense, up or down vote.
2) Work to remove the various “boutique” fuel blends required by the EPA, and putting the country on one standard, clean burning gasoline and diesel fuel blend. Competing products only increase costs.
3) A bill that promotes nuclear energy and nuclear fuel reprocessing to reduce waste and provide 100% zero emissions electricity. If the United States Navy can put a reactor on a submarine, there is no reason this technology isn’t safe enough to power the general public’s electric use.
4) Pass legislation to make the fuel excise tax ONLY for road repairs and infrastructure improvements, and stop funneling it into the general fund. This would help alleviate congestion and thus conserve more transportation fuels.
5) Work with railroad companies to create the biggest and best rail system in the world for cargo and people transport, thus reducing the need for people to drive everywhere.
6) Provide incentives for business and homeowners to get on board with energy efficient buildings and homes, and I don’t mean Compact Florescent Light bulbs and their unintended consequences.
7) Instead of massive wind and solar farms, work with private investment, regulators, and landowners to move towards point of use power generation, thus minimizing the footprint for wind and solar farms as this technology becomes more efficient.
8) Stop pushing and subsidizing corn and food base ethanol/alcohol fuels. Here again, there is a competing product cost that has helped in part to drive rising food costs.

In summary, stop throwing the opposition a life preserver every time they start to drown under the pressure. This American, and many of his friends, simply want an up or down vote on ANWAR and Offshore oil production with NO STRINGS attached.

Remember, this is a battle worth fighting, and those whose seats are up for grabs come November, need your help to secure them. Thank you.

Sincerely,

FightinBluHen51


36 posted on 08/12/2008 8:00:14 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("...If it moves, tax it, if it moves faster, regulate it, if it stops, subsidies it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fightinbluhen51
Excellent letter fightinbluhen51.

I wrote my Senators, Chambliss and Isakson, letters as well, but I have to admit, after having to raise hell with MY "republican" Senators previously on their initial support of ted kennedy's Amnesty bill for illegals, I was much less "cordial" in my latest emails to them.

Hopefully, they'll straighten up and fly right, as my Mom used to say.

37 posted on 08/12/2008 6:45:17 PM PDT by DocH (hussein and juan - what kind of choice is THAT? God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson