Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack the Divider? - The rise and fall of hope ... (MORE Moonbat body oder from FEAR !)
Gay Wired.com ^ | 8/10/2008 | Matt Bell

Posted on 08/11/2008 9:01:52 AM PDT by IrishMike

My early decision to support Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton was founded upon the notion that in this important election year, Senator Obama was the candidate best suited to pulling the country together. I was sure Clinton, despite her proven political and governing prowess, would only unite the Republicans with her perennial scandals and ruin the Democrats’ chances of taking the White House.

But this morning I awoke in an unsettling panic from a peculiar dream. I was sitting at a conference table with Hillary Clinton (adorned in a navy pant suit) and repeatedly hugging her. Each hug seemed to peel away a layer of guilt and regret. It was the kind of feeling a child would have after not listening to a parent’s advice, only to end up in the kind of mess only a parent can solve. It was an “I told you so” moment as I opened my eyes.

I’m no dream analyst, but my subconscious clearly articulated what Democrats, progressives, liberals, and in particular, Obama supporters, must be coming to terms with as of late. Maybe on the surface, a Clinton candidacy would have brought with it more baggage, but the underlying realities of the current Obama candidacy are bearing new spoiled fruit that might, in the end, give us another four years of a Republican presidency.

Indeed, Barack Obama, with all of his positive posturing and talk of unity and hope, has somehow become the great divider. While Republicans either feel indifferent or tepid support for John McCain, Democrats and Republicans alike seem to have something to say about Obama.

But what would we expect from a candidate refusing to play the “politics as usual” game while running against a man playing straight out of the Karl Rove handbook? The recent bombardment of unscrupulous anti-Obama ads is doing the same thing similar negative ads have done in the past—namely, creating doubt and, more specifically, fostering fear among the sort of swing voters who decide elections.

This year, those swing voters include Clinton Democrats. Just in case you missed the primaries, that’s about half of all Democrats. We knew Clinton was flawed, but at least we also knew exactly how the Republican attacks against her would be packaged and how they would (or wouldn’t) stick.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; barakobama; clinton; democratparty; democrats; dnc; election; electionpresident; elections; nobama08; obama

1 posted on 08/11/2008 9:01:53 AM PDT by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Oh Please! “straight out of the Karl Rove handbook”? Honey, McCain and the GOP so far has been very gentle with BO. You are rightabout one thing though, BO is not a uniter. After refering to rural voters as bitter and clinging, then telling anyone who laughed at his assertion that inflating your tires would save enough gas to not have to drill as ignorant I’d say that he’s sucessfully ran off the moderates he’d have needed to win.


2 posted on 08/11/2008 9:07:36 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Obama was the candidate best suited to pulling the country together.

Only possible if the entire population is gullible -- and that just isn't the case.

3 posted on 08/11/2008 9:08:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
While Republicans either feel indifferent or tepid support for John McCain, Democrats and Republicans alike seem to have something to say about Obama.

Ummmm, If Clinton was the nominee, the situation would be much more polarized.

Some suspect it's as bad as it is now for Obama because of Clinton "friends" in the MSM...

Clinton supporters seem to be having a tantrum - at Obama's expense...

4 posted on 08/11/2008 9:10:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (If Hillary steals the nomination, blacks will sit home. The GOP can take it all. Go for it Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
If you want to further DIVIDE this country along racial and social lines,,,

a Marxist like B. (whose middle name, according to McCain, must NEVER be spoken) Obama,,,

his blatantly racist close friend, mentor, and spiritual advisor,,,

and his anti-American, angry, bitter wife,,,

ARE JUST THE PEOPLE FOR THE JOB!!

5 posted on 08/11/2008 9:17:19 AM PDT by stockstrader (CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Mr. Obama voted the party line in the Senate 97% of the time.

In the state Senate in Illinois he voted “present” 130 times - usually on difficult issues.

Bring people together?

Mr. Obama couldn’t close an umbrella.


6 posted on 08/11/2008 9:20:12 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Americans never quit!" Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

(My early decision to support Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton was founded upon the notion that in this important election year, Senator Obama was the candidate best suited to pulling the country together)

So what you have said is, you thought that a person that has litte background or record in governing anything, was the person you chose to “pull the Country together” (whatever that means)?
Not much of a reason to exercise your franchise for someone.....
So the fact that the guy basically does belive in America to begin with and is only slightly less then a Communist in his political agenda meant nothing to you?
Gee what a great American you are................


7 posted on 08/11/2008 9:20:18 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Got Freedom ? Thank a Veteran...... Want to keep Freedom? Don't vote Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

All this “pulling the country together” crap is just that. Obamalamadingdong can only unite the ignorant young, blacks and guilted whites. I don’t think that will be enough to win an election in the fall.

Besides, if I want change, I’ll reach into the ash tray in my car.


8 posted on 08/11/2008 9:22:29 AM PDT by West Texas Chuck (US out of the UN - UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

It won’t be anything that Republicans or our presumptive candidate John McCain say that will turn the tide against Barack Hussein Obama, it will be his association with people like Tony Rezko, William Ayers, and Aiham Alsammarae that will derail his Presidential aspirations. Combine these crooked associations with his lack of anything resembling experience to do the job and Obama is doomed to failure.


9 posted on 08/11/2008 9:25:44 AM PDT by IrishMike (Obama stands for change. He wants to change the subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

I am waiting for when O “rebounds” in some way.

Someone, somewhere, will compare it to the Resurrection.

You watch.


10 posted on 08/11/2008 9:27:56 AM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

“My early decision to support Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton was founded upon the notion that in this important election year, Senator Obama was the candidate best suited to pulling the country together. I was sure Clinton, despite her proven political and governing prowess, would only unite the Republicans with her perennial scandals and ruin the Democrats’ chances of taking the White House.”

This is an example of libs being able to believe multiple contradictory things simultaneously. BO’s mission, in his/her mind, was to “pull the country together” under socialist rule.

Maybe this person’s fantasy is that BO would make socialism, multiculturalism, infanticide, and surrender suddenly acceptable to the rest of the nation and we would all “pull together” for her noble goals.

At least conservatives understand that when we govern, we govern a divided country in which about 30% of the citizens are viciously opposed to everything we stand for and will do ANYTHING to prevent effective conservative governance. W, unfortunately, never understood that he was in a death battle with these folks and tried to treat them like rational humans.

I suspect that the author is really just sorry that BO will not be as effective at fooling the rubes about his radical agenda as the author thought—so back to “miss moderate,” HRC; may she can fool the rubes better than BO.

The “pulling together” crap only works when people share common goals. I don’t want to pull together with the author. I want to prevent him/her from destroying our nation.


11 posted on 08/11/2008 9:28:52 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Buyer's Remorse !

...loving it.

12 posted on 08/11/2008 9:36:57 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

13 posted on 08/11/2008 9:37:07 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
The recent bombardment of unscrupulous anti-Obama ads is doing the same thing similar negative ads have done in the past—namely, creating doubt and, more specifically, fostering fear among the sort of swing voters who decide elections.

The donkeys are braying ... must mean the last few salvos have been on target.

Fire for effect ...

14 posted on 08/11/2008 9:44:41 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Privatizing profits and socializing losses is no way to run an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Texas Chuck
All this “pulling the country together” crap is just that.

In Obama's own words - - bamboozling, hoodwinking, and doing the okie dokie - - all the way to the White House.
15 posted on 08/11/2008 9:45:27 AM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

August is the Time to Take Obama Down

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,396221,00.html


16 posted on 08/11/2008 9:54:52 AM PDT by IrishMike (Obama stands for change. He wants to change the subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson