Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist challenges ‘In God We Trust’(We need to Freep the survey!)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10103424/ ^

Posted on 08/14/2008 10:30:48 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants

SAN FRANCISCO - An atheist who has spent four years trying to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from being recited in public schools is now challenging the motto printed on U.S. currency because it refers to God. Michael Newdow seeks to remove “In God We Trust” from U.S. coins and dollar bills, claiming in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that the motto is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion....

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitheist; churchandstate; firstamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: ericc4

Look, I know this might seem a little out of line but since you atheists have no fear of “life after death” and the pain of punishment in Hell, maybe you could go discuss your feelings with this Newdow puke. Certainly you have nothing to lose (and neither does he).


21 posted on 08/14/2008 11:01:04 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And fight if we must
When our cause is just
And our motto shall be
In God is our trust
Oh say does that Star Spangled Banner yet wave
o’re the land of the free
and the home of the brave


22 posted on 08/14/2008 11:03:57 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Nice try there muawiyah, but seriously why all the hate? Come in for a hug, come on, hug it out. ;)


23 posted on 08/14/2008 11:04:13 AM PDT by Pawtucket Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Frankly I think you should remain seated while communion is passed and the government should be neutral when it comes to oaths and affirmations (except for the President and the judges).

People should be free to say what they want, and there should be no liberty at all for anyone to be able to go to court to suppress the free speech of others (except for kiddie porn, of course).

24 posted on 08/14/2008 11:04:52 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pawtucket Patriot

Hate is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.


25 posted on 08/14/2008 11:05:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

Well, said, my FRiend, and I agree.


26 posted on 08/14/2008 11:06:20 AM PDT by JamesP81 (George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a suggestion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m not opposed to this at all. I’m just saying that if we have some oath or pledge, I would rather it be the Constitution than the state.


27 posted on 08/14/2008 11:07:10 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Devilinbaggypants
Direct link to poll
28 posted on 08/14/2008 11:07:55 AM PDT by BubbaBasher (No matter who wins, we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camerakid400

How, unless you believe in some “evolving” Constitution,

can “In God We Trust” be deemed a Constitutional non-issue at ratification,

and without any textual changes regarding this issue,

now be even considered to be remotely unconstitutional?

Oh, forgot the effects of “libtardation”.


29 posted on 08/14/2008 11:08:46 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrB

In God We Trust is the official national motto of the United States and the U.S. state of Florida. The motto first appeared on a United States coin in 1864, but In God We Trust did not become the official U.S. national motto until after the passage of an Act of Congress in 1956.

I guess I’m not following what you’re saying MrB about an evolving Constitution.


30 posted on 08/14/2008 11:12:11 AM PDT by Pawtucket Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Seriously, in the Big Picture,

why would atheists care if we killed a human or two, or 600 million (deaths communists/atheists responsible for in 20th century)?

I mean, humans are only in existance for around 60-70 years max, right? That’s just an eyeblink in history.

Why would it even matter if we snuffed the atheists, then?
I mean, they’re just a bit more evolved than a chimpanzee, and not worth much more anyway...

Or, you could look at humans as
the crowning glory of God’s Creation,
made in His image, with eternal life,
for the purpose of His Glory.

But, to say one view is superior to the other would be “intolerant”, now, wouldn’t it?


31 posted on 08/14/2008 11:13:06 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ericc4

Sure....if one chooses atheism so be it. There is no formal discrimination against it. In this predominantly Judeao-Christian culture a few radical atheists with agendas should not be able tear down the practices of the majority. Glad you are not one of them.


32 posted on 08/14/2008 11:13:26 AM PDT by tflabo (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

Exactly - the Secular Humanists have figured out how use the government to impose their religion on the rest of us.


33 posted on 08/14/2008 11:14:20 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pawtucket Patriot

Leftists invented the concept of a “living Constitution” and “evolving standards” in order to get around the proscriptions on powers of the federal government.

I’m being highly sarcastic on this topic, because it disgusts me so.


34 posted on 08/14/2008 11:15:50 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

In Great Britain MP’s and others are required to swear an oath to the Queen, and there has been a move afoot to make others (such as schoolchildren) do so as well.

I guess that’s why those folks are called “subjects”, while we’re called “citizens”.


35 posted on 08/14/2008 11:17:26 AM PDT by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Doesn’t Newdow have a freakin’ JOB to go to?


36 posted on 08/14/2008 11:18:25 AM PDT by Xenalyte (~ ~ FREE LAZAMATAZ! ~ ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB

We all know Al Gore coined the phrase, but what does that have to do with the topic?

I’m simply saying, if we didn’t have “evolving standards,” the phrase, “In God We Trust” wouldn’t be on any coinage, or anything, yet you seem disgusted by that.

Along the same lines, women wouldn’t have the right to vote, does that disgust you too?


37 posted on 08/14/2008 11:21:26 AM PDT by Pawtucket Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I know this might seem a little out of line but since you atheists have no fear of “life after death” and the pain of punishment in Hell

Wow. So atheists and saved Christians have something really big in common: no fear after death and no Hell. Who knew? We agnostics are just wishy washy, hedging our bets.

38 posted on 08/14/2008 11:24:04 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pawtucket Patriot

To my knowledge, Al Gore didn’t coin the phrase “living Constitution” - this has been used by judges long before algore was on the scene in order to bypass the onerous task of amending the Constitution.

I’m disgusted by judges (and libs) who have no regard for the written words of the Constitution or the methods by which it actually may legitimately be changed.
BTW, the 19th AMENDMENT conferred the right to vote on women. This is the proper way to change the Constitution.

At ratification, the “standards” were set, as well as a way to change those standards.

“In God We Trust” is not the result of an evolved standard, it is the result of a set standard. I’m not sure what you meant by that.


39 posted on 08/14/2008 11:29:59 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Hedging our bets is right DMZ. LOL.
600,000+ religions in the world, every human society no matter how remote on earth has some form of religion, and I just can’t figure out which one is the best for me yet. hah!

Seriously, my other friend who’s Agnostic like myself says he tells people he’s Agnostic because he doesn’t know the bible well enough to be an Atheist. A good Atheist must know the bible very well in America. Anyone want to know why? It may have to do with some kind of pressure or social brow beating perhaps?


40 posted on 08/14/2008 11:30:55 AM PDT by Pawtucket Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson