Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

Oh, there “are no scientists” on the other side of the debate.

The evo/atheist/billions of years crowd defines them as “not scientists”, avoiding, therefore, any need to address the debate.

In dating rocks, what ASSUMPTIONS are made, fellas?
Are those assumptions valid? Do you know the starting conditions, absolutely?


34 posted on 08/18/2008 10:54:59 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

We are in the majority. If we ever got our act together, all the definitions in the world wouldn’t save their state-enforced hold on power.


48 posted on 08/18/2008 11:15:51 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson