[GOP_Party_Animal]

One of the simplest, and most effective pro-life arguments is: If we don't know when life begins, then we must err on the side of not killing a fetus because we may be killing an innocent human.

Obama admits he doesn't know - fine. So how does he justify ending what may be life?

[MrB]

So how does he justify ending what may be life?

narcissistic evil?

[vietvet67]

Your comment says it all..

[mware]

I'll make it easy for Barry.

If he medical definition of death is the absence of brainwaves and a heartbeat, than the definition of life is the presence of brainwaves and a heartbeat.

[freespirited]

Obama admits he doesn't know - fine. So how does he justify ending what may be life?

Here's how I see it.

The fact that you have to end it proves that it's a life. Or the other way around: if it weren't a life, you wouldn't have to terminate it.

I think I learned this in ninth grade. For Bambi to say it's above his pay grade is insane. It's basic science.