Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disturbing trends precede presidential election
The SMU Daily Campus ^ | August 19, 2008 | Joseph Goddard

Posted on 08/19/2008 4:43:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Maelstorm

You’ve been here long enough to know how I feel: Remember the immigration fight? Having said that, any RINO beats a communist, racist, corrupt Daley machine pol with absolutely NO experience running ANYTHING! I’m about the same age as Senator Obama and I’m more qualified to be president than he is, and I AM NOT AT ALL QUALIFIED!!
How did we get to the point that there’s a better than 50% chance we’ll be saying “President Obama” next year?!


21 posted on 08/19/2008 11:59:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

One thing about “purists” is that the always lose. Sometimes sooner rather than later, but it is never “if” —they always lose.


22 posted on 08/20/2008 6:26:19 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

When the choices are down to a socialist Republican or a communist Democrat everyone who truly cares has already lost.


23 posted on 08/20/2008 6:53:20 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

You are looking for someone to place the blame upon. I have been a part of the Conservative political movement for forty years. I did what I could when I could to further Conservative political beliefs. The fact that the organization I once belonged to is now ridden with a cancerous internal disease is NOT of my doing. That is what I continually fought against.

If Obama becomes President the blame is much wider and much higher up the tree than I have ever been. The fact that the Republican Party leaders have chosen to default on their Oath of Office is not of my doing. Should you be looking in the mirror?


24 posted on 08/20/2008 7:03:54 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

I noticed that you haven’t made any entries on your profile page. Would you care to tell us what country, province or state and city you reside in?


25 posted on 08/20/2008 7:05:47 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
62% of American prefer a third choice
26 posted on 08/20/2008 8:44:59 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG; B4Ranch

“As I said, just one time I would really like to hear someone refusing to vote for one candidate acknowledging that their refusal helps the other guy get elected.”

I’ll admit it. You also need to admit that not voting for Obama, like most of us here, helps McCain. And that’s more help than he deserves.


27 posted on 08/20/2008 9:20:39 AM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

“62% of American prefer a third choice “
http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/2926/53/

They ought to forget about regular voting machines and make them all braille. This election is truly the blind leading the blind.

McCain Supporters Farthest Off the Mark
WASHINGTON (March 31, 2007) – A new poll using neutral language finds that primary and caucus voters have little knowledge of candidates’ immigration positions. The results also show that voters often do not share their candidate’s position.

Of McCain voters, 35 percent mistakenly thought he favored enforcement that would cause illegals to return home, another 10 percent thought he wanted mass deportations, and 21 percent didn’t know his position.
* Voters often held different positions from the candidate they supported. Only 31 percent of McCain voters had the same immigration position as he does. For Clinton voters, 45 percent shared her position; 61 percent of Obama voters shared his position.

http://www.cis.org/articles/2008/voter_release_08.html


28 posted on 08/20/2008 9:25:45 AM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Then I commend you.

And I ask that you speak up when others who refuse to vote for McCain blame (fill-in-the-blank -— the MSM, the GOP, the RNC, blah blah blah -— in other words, anyone not including themselves) for, thereby, helping Obambi get elected.

Of course I readily admit that not voting for Obambi helps McCain. That’s integral to my whole point. It’s also ONE of the reasons I am voting for McCain: to STOP Obambi. You and I apparently disagree on whether that is good or bad for the country, but I do readily admit it.

People have different views on who should and should not be president. That’s normal. What’s not normal, in terms of logic, is claiming that one’s refusal to vote for one candidate *in no way* facilitates the election of the other candidate.

So, hat’s off to you. Thanks.


29 posted on 08/20/2008 5:44:20 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Suit yourself.

It’s not a question of blame, it’s a question of responsibility.

You, as a voter, have available to you a political act that you can decide to use as a VOTE or as a PROTEST.

Proceed accordingly, that’s all.


30 posted on 08/20/2008 5:47:47 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The fact that the organization I once belonged to is now ridden with a cancerous internal disease is NOT of my doing. That is what I continually fought against.

If Obama becomes President the blame is much wider and much higher up the tree than I have ever been. The fact that the Republican Party leaders have chosen to default on their Oath of Office is not of my doing.

I see. Some do get discouraged and quit when they feel that the election of the President of the United States is above their paygrade as a citizen.

My condolences on being victimized by history.

Well. Even if we are all doomed and victims of Them, I'm still going to use my vote as a vote, not a protest, and try to stop what I see as a great threat to the nation.

The fact that the choice put to me is not of my own making is immaterial to the fact that I still can (and, in my view, am responsible) for making that choice.

But that's just my take on it.

31 posted on 08/20/2008 5:54:48 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; B4Ranch
FJ wrote: “As I said, just one time I would really like to hear someone refusing to vote for one candidate acknowledging that their refusal helps the other guy get elected.”

AuntB wrote: I’ll admit it. You also need to admit that not voting for Obama, like most of us here, helps McCain.

AuntB, a few more thoughts on your post. (And this time a copy to B4, as you had done.)

Here's the thing:

1. We agree that not voting for Obambi helps McCain get elected.

But--

2. Voting for McCain also helps McCain get elected (so no change in outcome there) AND it helps defeatT Obambi, by cancelling out someone else's vote for Obambi.

Either way (not voting for Obambi or voting for McCain), a person is helping McCain get elected. But there is only way to ALSO help Obambi get defeated. That is by voting for McCain.

Of course, as I said previously, the converse is true:

1. Not voting for McCain helps Obambi get elected.

2. Voting for Obambi helps Obambi get elected (so no change in outcome there) AND it helps defeat McCain, by cancelling out someone else's vote for McCain.

My only point is this:

Those who refuse to vote for McCain, whatever their reasons and no matter how legitimate their reasons are, are helping Obambi get elected and doing nothing to help defeat him.

Moreover, unless that person votes for Obambi, he is helping McCain get elected anyway.

So, it's really not logical to claim that one is refusing to vote for McCain because one doesn't want to help him get elected. The only way to "not help" McCain get elected is to vote for Obambi. The only way to "not help" Obambi get elected is to vote for McCain.

If a person refusing to vote for McCain is honest about that result and comfortable with it, so be it.

But to somehow attempt to claim that, by voting for neither McCain or Obambi, one is absolved from responsibility for the outcome of the election is disingenuous.

The fact is it is impossible to simply wash one's hands of the election. So long as a person is eligible to vote, how one uses his vote (either as a vote or as a protest) does, in fact, have an impact on the election that is traceable to that individual.

Again, if a person is honest with himself that, by refusing to vote for McCain, he helps Obambi get elected and he does nothing to help defeat Obambi, and the person is comfortable with that, so be it.

If a person truly wants to stop McCain, he should vote for Obambi.

If a person truly wants to stop Obambi, he should vote for McCain.

A person who votes for neither effectively does nothing to help either candidate lose, but does help the winner win.

Remember the "Don't blame me: I voted for Bush" bumper stickers that were popular in the 'Toon years?

There's a reason there were no "Don't blame me: I didn't vote" stickers.

Bottom line: Unless you vote for Obambi, you can't avoid helping McCain. So the question is, do you think you should do something to help defeat Obambi? Would that be a good thing for the nation or not?

32 posted on 08/21/2008 11:14:57 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

“Those who refuse to vote for McCain, whatever their reasons and no matter how legitimate their reasons are, are helping Obambi get elected and doing nothing to help defeat him.”

Fine, maybe you’d be happy if I just vote Obama. One traitor is as good as the next.


33 posted on 08/21/2008 12:01:10 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When we’re both in line at the Robert C. Byrd Memorial reeducation camp for breakfast gruel before our first work detail, remind me how that “sticking to your guns” worked out for you, okay?

Hyperbole much?

The fact is we made it through eight years of Clinton and four years of Carter with an even more liberal Democrat Congress. President Obama won't be so bad, specifically because it will force the GOP to get back to its conservative roots. If Obama wins, we get back the House and Senate in 2010, and grab enough state legislatures to ensure we draw the districts after the 2010 census.

A McCain win, however, is the worst case scenario. It's the death penalty for conservatism because it teaches Republicans the way to win is by embracing amnesty, "climate change" and the left wing of the party.

The the Supreme Court canard? We can obstruct any nominee by Obama made before 2010. After 2010, we'll probably control Congress.

McCain will NOT appoint a pro-life nominee because they'll want to appoint someone who will get through the Democrat Congress. And as we've seen with McCain-Feingold and everything else he's proposed, McCain LOVES working with Democrats to get something left-of-center through Congress.

A vote for McCain is a vote to kill conservatism.

34 posted on 08/21/2008 12:10:49 PM PDT by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top 1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

It’s not about what makes me happy.

I would like it, however, if you would address my actual post.

Do you agree that the only way to help defeat Obambi is to vote for McCain?

If so, do you think helping to defeat Obambi is worth a try for the sake of the nation or not?


35 posted on 08/21/2008 12:11:35 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Fine, maybe you’d be happy if I just vote Obama. One traitor is as good as the next.

Would YOU be happy voting for Obambi?

If so, by all means, go ahead.

Would YOU be happy helping Obambi get elected?

If so, then don't vote for John McCain.

Either way, you're helping Obambi get elected. If you're okay with that, so be it.

36 posted on 08/21/2008 12:16:33 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG; B4Ranch

This is a stupid conversation, is what this is. I’m not going to vote for John McCain. Never, ever, ain’t gonna happen. All this is a big farce and a gigantic waste of time. Go convince someone to vote for McCain who hasn’t followed him since he stepped off that plane in ‘74 and doesn’t know how bad he sucks. Your time is wasted on me.

As I said, the logical conclusion to your train of thought of course is, If I don’t vote for Obama, I’m supporting McCain. And that’s as far as I can go to help put Johnny in office.

“”Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” - John Quincy Adams”


37 posted on 08/21/2008 12:32:16 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Go convince someone to vote for McCain who hasn’t followed him since he stepped off that plane in ‘74 and doesn’t know how bad he sucks.

lol you're awesome AuntB!!

38 posted on 08/21/2008 12:33:52 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
One thing about “purists” is that the always lose.

Tell that to the founding fathers.

39 posted on 08/21/2008 12:35:44 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG; AuntB

Without a doubt you are a lawyer and a woman.

You don’t seem to be able to comprehend that I do not want either one of them. I won’t vote for a socialist nor will I vote for a communist. Voting for either one of them violates the oath I took when I joined the Navy; ... to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic. There is no expiration date on that oath, so stop asking me to violate it!


40 posted on 08/21/2008 12:41:22 PM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson