Unfortunately not accurate. The true feminazis just think of it as a failed medical procedures that needs to be corrected.
Which is entirely logical. What, after all, is the real difference between a baby that is 80% born and has a partial-birth procedures performed on her, and one that is 100% born and then stuck in a closet to slowly die?
It is, however, interesting that apparently few or none even among abortionists have the moral courage to put the baby to sleep to end her suffering as we would for a dog in pain. In fact, someone who did this to a puppy would face serious jail time. Only legal when performed on human babies.
Apparently humans we're killing must die in the most painful and drawn-out way possible so we can pretend we aren't really killing them. Teri Schiavo being a case in point.
Maybe now the Big O will throw himself under the bus.
“This is not the Barack Obama I knew.”
One lecturer related his experience after showing, with the SLED argument, that there is no difference between a newborn and a “fetus” as far as humanity goes.
Afterwards, a couple of feminists came up to him and said “You convinced us, we’ve changed our minds”.
He said, “oh, now you understand why abortion is wrong?”
They said, “no, we’re now pro-infanticide.”