Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojito
Obama has been insisting that if the wording of the Illinois Born-Alive Infant Protection legislation had been similar to the wording of federal legislation, he would have voted for the legislation.

He was for it before he was against it....
9 posted on 08/20/2008 12:38:44 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beezdotcom
He was for it before he was against it....

Watching the panel at the end of H&C last night was fascinating. To hear Betchell accuse and attack Hannity and Anne Colter, asking "How low can you Republicans go?" Wow!!!

I cannot call it abortion after the fetus would be viable, maybe 5-6 months. To partially deliver an 8-month premie and suck it's brains out isn't abortion, it's murder to me and to most Americans. Obama supports that form of infanticide and it was just a small step for him to prefer the killing of a survivor of a "botched abortion" whatever that phrase means.

I really believe that this punk State Senator five years ago didn't envision himself being on the national stage in such a short time having to defend his punk statements about an "Infant Protection" bill potentially impacting partial birth abortions and eventually all late-term abortions, thus limiting Roe v. Wade.

What I've heard is that Obama chaired the Health Committee in Illinois and blocked this bill from even coming a vote two or three times. When it did get past him he voted against protecting infants once and the other time, he denounced the Infant Protection bill then voted "Present".

35 posted on 08/20/2008 1:02:58 PM PDT by DJtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson