Obama’s shill Matthew Littman is on O’Reilly right now telling Laura Ingraham that BHO wouldn’t be so “heartless” as to support this kind of bill...
Wow. It’s like a punch to the heart to hear this.
I have it saved locally. I expect YouTube to pull it, YouTube being owned by Google and Google being one of the most liberal corporations around.
Not a lot of audio here, there must be more where this came from. Can we get it all?
Its still at 218 views since first reported over 20 minutes ago. This thread has probably had over 100 view since them.
The Youtube comments stopped activity as well. Someone with an account needs to attempt to place a comment on the Youtube comment section to see if Youtube is supressing comments as well.
I sent it to Michelle Malkin. People should send it to the media.
There have been over 1600 views of this thread at Freep but supposedly only 218 at Youtube with no movement of the count for 30 minutes. Either Youtube is caching vid counts or they are supressing the vid count. Will see...
No stuttering here. BO is speaking with confidence and conviction in this clip!
To quote Kwame Kilpatrick (Mayor of Detroit): “BUSTED IS WHAT YOU SEE”
Translation for the non-Irish: “You only get in trouble if people SEE you doing it”
Conclusion: Barry is in SERIOUS trouble over this video
Sent it to my aunt who will send it to 50 people who will each send it to 50 people and so on and so on....
A few months ago, I heard obama on the tv saying he didn’t want his daughter punished with a baby etc. I know I heard him say “the man/boy too”. Meaning not only girls being punished with a baby, but the boys too. It sounded like he wasn’t planning on saying it, he kind of mumbled it.
I wasn’t paying close attention because I had my hands wrist deep mixing a meatloaf and couldn’t handle the remote to change the channel. I swear he said that because I remember gasping out loud.
Somebody long ago should have burdened Obama with a conscience.
Uhhhhbabykiilerbama's got some splainin to do!
Can you imagine that argument used in a paternity suit.
"Look, yer Honor, payin' child support fer the kid would be a real burden for me. Can't I just call my cousin Guido and have the kid whacked?"
Wasn’t he a constitutional professor?
Considering the burden on the woman is only relevant to an analysis of a law that has effect pre-viability. Post-viability, the constitutional test shifts to favor the child’s right to life, which can be outweighed only by risk to the mother’s health or safety. He seems to ignore the existing Constitutional standard (let alone of course the broader, more important, issue).