Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org
I mean, it ­­ it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional.

If this is a child?? Seriously, what else is "it"--a reptile?? Go home, Barry. Just. Go. Home.

19 posted on 08/21/2008 1:11:40 AM PDT by Shelayne (After seeing Obama without teleprompter, I think the tingle on Chris Matthews' leg is probably pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shelayne
"and if this is a child"

The mainstream media is so incompetent. He went to Harvard Law. The next time this comes up someone HAS to ask him if learned what "habeas corpus" means in law school.

"Now, Senator Obama, really, why on earth from either a scientific perspective, theological perspective, or legal perspective, would anyone think it was 'above his pay grade' to figure out whether a breathing infant outside of the womb meets the conditions for being a child?"

23 posted on 08/21/2008 12:05:40 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson