To: MHGinTN; cpforlife.org; narses
:"Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a nine-month-old -- child that was delivered to term. "
Obama is saying there is a problem granting a child "born alive" in a botched abortion the same rights to protection and medical care as a "nine-month-old" child. This has to be the most absurd and extreme abortionist argumentation ever. This goes WAY beyond Roe vs. Wade.
And O'Malley exposed the spurious effort by Obama to obfuscate the truth on personhood:
"The Constitution does not say that a child born must be viable in order to live and be accorded the rights of citizenship."
posted on 08/21/2008 5:47:43 PM PDT
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson