Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

“The error seems to be Obama thinking that the constitutional right to life of a child is contingent upon whether the mother itended the child to be born or aborted.” And that is why Obama is rightly accused of defending INFANTICIDE. The sick, constantly interrupting, rdue freak Alan Colmes tries to make it sound like pointing out Obama’s defense of denying these born alive children their Constitutional rights is accusing him of killing children himself. Well, the realty is Obam’s protection of this evil makes him complicit in it. HE IS GUILTY of protecting infanticide!


31 posted on 08/21/2008 6:48:25 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN; HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; Arthur Wildfire! March; hocndoc; Coleus; nickcarraway; ...

Please correct me if I’m wrong. If a baby survives an abortion and lives for a time, doesn’t the child get a Birth Certificate and a Death Certificate? I’m getting at personhood & human rights—of course.

I’m starting to think Obama really wants to select Peter Singer from Princeton as his VP. He’s probably Barry’s #1 hero.


32 posted on 08/21/2008 9:17:16 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available FREE at CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson