Obama the aider and abettor to murder of the unborn.
This will not phase liberals as they could care less.
bookmark for later
Well to be fair, in the Saddlebrook forum Barrack did say he did favor some restrictions on late-term abortions. Little did we know he meant six weeks after birth.
Obama is one sick person.
Obama fights for abortionist’s rights to throw live babies in the dumpsters.
In a sane world, this issue would sink Obama. His actions here are indefensible.
A “nonviable fetus” with movement?
You're preaching to the choir here. We already know this.
Rush playing the audio now.
You can listen to it here:
If I understand correctly, Obambi is saying that if the Dr. made a mistake by not really killing the baby and it comes out alive and it’s showing signs of life, that same Dr. (if you want to call it that) would do anything in his/her power to save the life he/she just tried to terminate? I have never heard of a case like that in the media or anywhere else. I have never heard of a “Dr.” saving the life of a baby who was being aborted and had the AUDACITY of living.
I’m sure this feeling is mutual: This makes me sick!
Obama — the PROTECTOR of ABORTIONISTS, but not babies who are born alive!!
A package of Born Alive bills was introduced three times during Obama’s tenure.
The cornerstone bill was the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which defined legal personhood. This definition was identical to the federal BAIPA (1) which was drafted from the definition of “live birth” created by the World Health Organization in 1950 (2) and adopted by the United Nations in 1955 (3)....
Here I will only post links to Obama’s actions and votes on the cornerstone bill, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. The bill number changed every year it was reintroduced.
Senate Bill 1095 (4), Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Go here to view Obama’s “no” vote (5) in the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 28, 2001.
Transcript of Obama’s verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor (6), March 30, 2001, pages 84-90
Obama’s verbal oppostion to Born alive, (7) “And if were placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as as is necessary to keep that child alive, then were probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality.” March 30, 2001
Obama’s “present” vote on the IL Senate floor ( 8 ), March 30, 2001
Senate Bill 1662 ( 9 ), Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Go here to view Obama’s “no” vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee (10) on March 6, 2002. (ABC inadvertently coped bill #1663, a companion bill. The vote for the Born Alive bill, #1662, was identical.)
Transcript of Obama’s verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor (11), April 4, 2002, pages 28-35
Obama’s “no” vote on the IL Senate floor (12), April 4, 2002
Senate Bill 1082 (13), Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Democrats took control of the IL Senate with the 2002 elections. They sent Born Alive to the infamously liberal Health & Human Services Committee, chaired by Barack Obama (14).
As can be seen on the Actions docket (15), Obama held Born Alive on March 6, 2003, from even being voted on in committee. It is also important to note from the docket that on March 13, 2003, Obama stopped the senate sponsor from adding the lately discussed clarification paragraph (16) from the federal BAIPA, to make the bills absolutely identical.
“in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead”
that’s pretty clinical for a senator, isn’t it?
Which would explain why that nurse who had testified before Mr. Obama had to go into that disposal area and cradle the aborted infant untill it died. Right. Disgusting.
They should be posted in their entirety on FR so EVERYONE can see he's not telling the truth.