I’m not a Catholic, but from what I do know, the Church is pretty clear on when life begins, and has publicly stated on several occasions.
And Nancy says even if life begins at conception, then she’s still in favor of abortion. Hmmm...taking a human life after it has begun. Somehow in Nancy’s mind this is not murder. What a truly stupid, twisted person.
Your thought processes have to be as messed up as a pile of hangers to justify liberal positions on anything.
Actually the debate was more over when the soul entered the body, not when life began. There were some that held that this did not happen until the “quickening”, the first movements of the baby.
Science has allowed us to see into the womb and shown us that from the moment of conception, humans have separate and unique DNA.
Funny how all the pro-aborts who are so enamored with the science of global warming and embryonic stem cell research
ignore the clear science of DNA and ultrasound.
I tell my lib friends that the right to be born trumps the right to choose life. The mother has already had the right to live, her child hasn’t.
The point is, is that it shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose, she said. Roe v. Wade talks about very clear definitions of when the child -- first trimester, certain considerations; second trimester; not so third trimester. There's very clear distinctions. This isn't about abortion on demand ... This lying demonspawn has defended partial birth infanticide, so we know she is lying when she tries to make a case for there being restrictions on abortion because of personhood 'approaching'. This sick female sold her soul long ago for empowerment through defending, promoting, and funding the abortion slaughter. But she lies so convincingly ... of course, catholic democrats want the lies to soothe their dead consciences as they defy the Pope's teaching and the teaching of Jesus Himself! Sadly Catholics don't appear too interested in correcting these catholics.