The choice was simple: sit back and watch the decade's second Balkan genocide, or split the two combatants up.
There's been a lot of whining and complaining since, but no new Srebrenicas.
If the Serbian regime had behaved decently in the first place, there would have been no need for intervention.
“The choice was simple: sit back and watch the decade’s second Balkan genocide, or split the two combatants up.”
I’m no fan of Milosevic, but there was no genocide in Kosovo. If ther was, wouldn’t the Hague have charged Milosevic with it? The Hague’s charges against Milosevic regarding Kosovo didn’t include genocide.
Espousing every anti-Christian Serb propaganda line there is, I see.
Next will come posts from Soros-sponsored websites, no doubt.
Only if one chooses to ignore (or perhaps supports) the ethnic cleansing of the Serb, Jew, and Roma residents of the Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija, including the destruction of 200+ Christian Churches and monasteries.
It's just not the sort of thing a Christian would support.
You speak of the genocide fabricated by the American Left Wing Press to provide Slick Willie cover for the Lewinskis he got. Are you out on the street agitating to bomb the Sudanese Muslims for their ongoing murders of Infidels? How about bombing the Chinese for their murders of Tibetans or Uighurs? How about bombing Indonesia for its ongoing murders of Christians by Muslims?
America had no business bombing the Serbs. Clinton is a war criminal. Bush is a sell out. To expect Russia to roll over and be nice with NATO advancing its military front toward Russia on top of taking territory from its ethnic brethren is idiotic. It's dangerous. People championing such a foreign policy are nuts.
What "second genocide" are you referring to?