Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

{ UC Berkeley } Stadium opponents file appeal
Contra Costa Times ^ | 8/28/8 | Doug Oakley

Posted on 08/28/2008 9:02:28 PM PDT by SmithL

BERKELEY —Two groups defeated in a lawsuit against UC Berkeley's plan to build a $125 million athletic training center near an earthquake fault appealed the ruling Thursday to the state court of appeals.

In the first step of the appeal, the California Oak Foundation and the Panoramic Hill Association will ask the court to forbid construction of the facility until the court begins deliberations on the case, which could take 10 to 18 months, according to a statement from the two groups.

The court could make a determination on whether UC Berkeley can begin construction while it awaits the outcome of the case sometime in the next two weeks, according to Dan Mogulof, a UC Berkeley spokesman.

Until then, the school has agreed to voluntarily delay groundbreaking.

The two groups and the city of Berkeley sued the school in December 2006. When Alameda County Superior Court Judge Barbara Miller handed the three groups a defeat, the city of Berkeley decided to opt out of an appeal.

The California Oak Foundation and the Panoramic Hill Association still contend state law forbids the school from building the training center near the Hayward Fault.

Other issues the two groups are championing against the school's plan are noise and traffic from construction, the school's consideration of alternative sites to build the facility and the impact of cutting down 38 California Coast live oak trees.

UC Berkeley believes Miller's decision Advertisement will hold up in the appeals process.

"Given the exhaustive and detailed nature of Judge Miller's ruling, we're optimistic the court of appeal will clear the way for construction in short order," Mogulof said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: berkeley; beserkeley; treesitters; uc

1 posted on 08/28/2008 9:02:29 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Liberal strategy, sue to stop then file appeal after appeal. This will often raise the price significantly, or wear out the other side. SICKENING and its in violation of 5th amendment. The school should be able to do anything they want WITH THEIR PROPERTY.


2 posted on 08/28/2008 11:13:16 PM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson