Skip to comments.
Sure the Trig Palin smear is nasty...but...
Ghost of Freerepublic's Past ^
| 9/1/2008
| FR
Posted on 09/01/2008 8:26:27 AM PDT by sam_paine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
To: sam_paine
“We?”
Speak for yourself chester.
21
posted on
09/01/2008 8:33:28 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
To: sam_paine
How many times have we seen this photo on FR? Because of your post, whatever the number is, it has now been increased by one.
Good job!
To: sam_paine
How many times did we say Edwards was cheating on his wife?
23
posted on
09/01/2008 8:33:33 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(Sarah Palin 08 12 16 20)
To: sam_paine
I guess that it ain’t been posted so much.
I don’t even understand the context?
Regardless, NJ Joe is correct; whatever your point is you seem to be painting all FReeps with a rather broad brush?
To: sam_paine
When did we ever make a connection to rape/incest?
When did we ever equate bad pre-natal care to causing a genetic disorder?
When did we ever resort to organized Internet War Rooms, not to support our candidates, but to trash the opposition?
Moral equivalence does not apply.
25
posted on
09/01/2008 8:34:04 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(I am not voting for McCain - I'm voting for PALIN!)
To: SlowBoat407
Besides, there were 100 dead bodies on the path to the White House...
26
posted on
09/01/2008 8:34:25 AM PDT
by
Stayfree
(***************************************IF IT IS LEFT, IT CAN'T BE RIGHT!!)
To: sam_paine
Very few of ‘us’ have indulged in that type of smear. I have to say though, the Left and the MSM have done their fair share of trashing the Bush twins and now they've started on the Palin kids. When it came to Chelsea the MSM was certainly ‘hands off’. It has been a disgusting display of partisanship by the Big Media.
To: sam_paine
Point noted.
However, it seems these “rumors” are more in jest than any real accusations, kind of like the Farkle Family and Ferd Berfel, at least that is how I take them. On the other hand I only give those posts a cursory glance and then move on so maybe its more than I think.
28
posted on
09/01/2008 8:35:21 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(Hey DU: Shut your festering gobs, you vacuous, toffee-nosed, malodorous perverts!)
To: sam_paine
29
posted on
09/01/2008 8:35:35 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Seinfeld was a show about nothing - so is Obama.)
To: sam_paine
First time I’ve seen that stupid pic. Gee, did you post it here as a lighting rod for the nutroots, so they can say “See, FR is just as bad!”
IBTZ!
30
posted on
09/01/2008 8:35:52 AM PDT
by
piytar
To: sam_paine
Wow big difference
Hillary's daughter is an adult, and putting herself on the campaign trail. But the Dems are going after minors even a baby that was just born. PLEASE!! Your comparison is ridiculous
To: comebacknewt
Search on google for “freerepublic.com hubbell chelsea”
You’ll be amazed. (also look at the link I referred to in the post....from 2004)
32
posted on
09/01/2008 8:36:19 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Airwinger
Troll! LOL. Dare to see reality==troll, then so be it.
33
posted on
09/01/2008 8:37:15 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: sam_paine
Spot on. Don’t listen to those who claim “they haven’t seen it.”
34
posted on
09/01/2008 8:37:35 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: sam_paine
I never saw that photo before and I am pretty active on FR.
There is no comparison between Freepers and KOmmies (or DUmmies). Sure, there may be marginal individuals on FR but that’s unavoidable in an online community this size. On the other hand, the mainstream of the Daily Kos is over-the-top nasty and puerile.
35
posted on
09/01/2008 8:37:42 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: sam_paine
ok, lemme see if I understand your drift.
Some FReepers may have spread rumors so we’re all guilty therefore KOS’s slander is our fault?
36
posted on
09/01/2008 8:37:46 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Seinfeld was a show about nothing - so is Obama.)
To: GOP_Party_Animal
“Because the one on FR is clearly in jest, the Kos post was presented as legitimate. Are you usually this slow?”
Clearly in jest? Let’s not be so disingenuous. Any numbers of Freepers were obviously perfectly serious.
To: sam_paine
Free Republic is not quite the same extent/coverage as that done by the entire media bashing of Palin. While it is wrong to hurt children, don’t compare this to the MSM
38
posted on
09/01/2008 8:38:22 AM PDT
by
nclaurel
To: sam_paine
How many times? Ummm, I’ve been here quite some time and this is the first I’ve seen of it..
39
posted on
09/01/2008 8:38:48 AM PDT
by
got_moab?
(got_moab? now comes complete with 50% MORE Hyper-conservatism!!)
To: txradioguy
Please point out when any of us have suggested that Chelsea was a child of incest. Or that Hillary was claiming a baby was hers to cover up for her teenage daughter?Ok, so claiming Hillary is a lesbian and that she had a love child with a staffmember is on the level, but claiming it was incest is where the demarcation is. Got it.
40
posted on
09/01/2008 8:38:50 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson