Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge: US WEEKLY MAG CASTS IT VOTE EARLY...(graphic display of MSM bias- Us Weekly)
Drudge Report Front Page ^ | 9-3-08

Posted on 09/03/2008 8:33:27 AM PDT by STARWISE



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008electionbias; 2008rncconvention; abortion; bigmedia; campbellbrown; catfight; cnn; culturewar; democratspanic; dncbrownshirts; doublestandard; drivebymedia; goebbelswouldbeproud; hollywoodreds; howtostealanelection; larrykinglive; mccainpalin; msmbias; obama; palin; palinattacks; palinfamily; palinnomination; palinping; personaldestruction; propagandawingofdnc; rollingstone; smearcampaign; spinrooms; stalinisttactics; tabloid; trashtv; usweakly; usweekly; usweeklycovers; yellowjournalism; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last
Lead Story (from Michelle Malkin)

P.D.S. alert: Us magazine’s partisan hit job
By Michelle Malkin •
September 2, 2008 11:17 PM

The next time you’re waiting at the grocery stands and tempted to buy Us magazine, stop and think again. Unless you’re buying it for oppo research, you may not want to put money in the pockets of rabid partisans who have turned their gossip rag into a propaganda arm for the Democrat Party.

This is the cover of the latest issue of Us:

(Shows the above cover pics)

A source forwards the following e-mail from former Clinton operative and Us weekly flack, Mark Neschis, that went out to all media in St. Paul:

Thought I would send over our Us Weekly/Sarah Palin cover story, on stands Friday, if helpful in your coverage. Might be useful as an illustration of how the news is playing out.(Us Weekly has 12 million, mostly female readers)

Mark Neschis
Corporate Communications Director Wenner Media Us Weekly | Rolling Stone | Men’s Journal

Steve Hayes notes that Us publisher Jann Wenner is a prominent Obama donor.

~~~~

Good for Matt Drudge ~~~!! Many, many millions will now see the indisputable evidence of the calculated and blatant mind-twisting orchestration and bias of the MSM now, and the active role they're playing in this election.

1 posted on 09/03/2008 8:33:28 AM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Also, the abuser/ex-husband was not fired.

A false claim on the cover of a mag seen at every grocery checkstand. The Palins should sue for millions and use part of the money to help find a cure for Down’s Syndrome.

2 posted on 09/03/2008 8:35:24 AM PDT by Carling (I'm a Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Fox has been showing the two covers all morning in outrage.


3 posted on 09/03/2008 8:35:30 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This “strategy” by Wenner and his horde of queens will backfire bigtime!


4 posted on 09/03/2008 8:36:43 AM PDT by Palladin (If Sarah can put down a moose, she can put down Obama/Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This “strategy” by Wenner and his horde of queens will backfire bigtime!


5 posted on 09/03/2008 8:37:06 AM PDT by Palladin (If Sarah can put down a moose, she can put down Obama/Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Quite the contrast! One is ALL smiles. The other is ALL frowns except for a smiling Sarah.


6 posted on 09/03/2008 8:37:27 AM PDT by C210N (The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

how is Fox spinning this...?? In favor of Sarah?
Haven’t watched the media. It is making me sick.
I am about ready to can the TV for GOOD!
I think the time has come for true conservatives to VOTE THE MEDIA OUT!!!!! at the pocketbook!
Polly


7 posted on 09/03/2008 8:38:06 AM PDT by pollywog (I will lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help. My help comes from the Lord...Ps 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

http://www.usmagazine.com/news/sarah-palin-very-difficult-to-work-with

Check out all the comments on their website! They have stepped in it BIGTIME! Dems & Reps alike seem to thin this is disgusting!.................


8 posted on 09/03/2008 8:38:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This is an OUTRAGE!!


9 posted on 09/03/2008 8:38:58 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

US...and by “us”, we mean not you.


10 posted on 09/03/2008 8:39:08 AM PDT by Rokurota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
The MSM is now trying to change the subject about how they treated this Governor but it's too late, everyone already sees through their lying, bias, sexist, liberal, Democrat agenda.
11 posted on 09/03/2008 8:40:44 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
I am about ready to can the TV for GOOD!

We should...need to see your favorite show? Rent it from Netflix. Dump your cable/dish.

12 posted on 09/03/2008 8:42:00 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Megyn Kelly was on with O’Reilly last night and was outraged by the media bias. Her argument was that Sarah being scrutinized far more than men would ever be. No contest with that.


13 posted on 09/03/2008 8:42:16 AM PDT by bcsco (Palin runs a state. Obama runs...from his ties to Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Two years ago, I did what you are talking about doing. I cut the cable. I haven’t missed it a bit and I save an extra $40 each month.


14 posted on 09/03/2008 8:42:21 AM PDT by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C210N; Miss Didi; All

And look at the sub-titles on the covers ..... !!

Most Americans aren’t political junkies like we are, but this will at least hopefully awaken some indifferent voters and leave a mark. Folks peruse the magazine covers when they’re in the checkout line.

What dirt peddlers they are.


15 posted on 09/03/2008 8:42:44 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Canning the media is a great idea. let me give you a couple examples why:
1. We lived in an “alley” where you heard ‘raw’ news coming through the wires. It was very interesting to hear the raw material, then watch the evening news! I was shocked so many times...it was bad back then...mid-1970s. My father was a life-time Republican, never joined the union at Chrysler, etc. After retiring and sitting home all day, wathcing the news and reading the Union papers, he switched tot he dems. You cannot ahve a reasonable conversation with him about politics, so it is avoided.


16 posted on 09/03/2008 8:43:02 AM PDT by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Canning the media is a great idea. let me give you a couple examples why:
1. We lived in an “alley” where you heard ‘raw’ news coming through the wires. It was very interesting to hear the raw material, then watch the evening news! I was shocked so many times...it was bad back then...mid-1970s.
2 My father was a life-time Republican, never joined the union at Chrysler, etc. After retiring and sitting home all day, wathcing the news and reading the Union papers, he switched tot he dems. You cannot ahve a reasonable conversation with him about politics, so it is avoided.


17 posted on 09/03/2008 8:43:16 AM PDT by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

G*ddamn the news media and its bias.


18 posted on 09/03/2008 8:44:34 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

The Friends were enraged all morning by the attacks on Sarah...especially Gretchen, a working mom herself. Rudy and Fred were guests and shared in their disgust.


19 posted on 09/03/2008 8:45:17 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I like this poster on the site.

11:27 AM WOMAN STANDING TALL Says:

” Here are some of the sponsors, for all of you who are just as outraged as I am.
Cover Girl....Neutrogena.....Coca Cola/Powerade....Pepperidge Farm....Lady Foot Locker....CW....TRESemme....M&Ms....Olay...ABC...RID...
Jack in the Box....Glaxo Smith Klein...food network...Target....Wrigley’s.
..Special K....McDonalds....NutriSystem....WalGreen’s...Figi Water....
and Sony.

In addition to boycotting this piece of trash mag....I urge each of you to boycott these sponsors, until they pull advertising dollars away from US!!!!!”

Keep this one going Copy and paste. These are the sponsors of the trashy magazine


20 posted on 09/03/2008 8:45:38 AM PDT by netmilsmom (If John's McCain's spirit was not broken by the Hanoi Hilton, it won't be by the angry left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery
Canning the media is a great idea.

I'd prefer caning them.

21 posted on 09/03/2008 8:46:08 AM PDT by polymuser (Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; All
My letter to US Weekly: NEW AMERICAN TERRORISM
To whom it may concern:

I can not find the words to express my utter disgust and contempt with the way in which US Weekly decided to terrorize Gov. Palin and her family.

I have never seen the vicious terrorizing and character assassination of one person disguised reporting.

And as for the credibility of the media, it is absolutely, 100%, utterly shot. Osama bin laden has more respect than the media.

American's across the country are so outraged at this terrorism against the Palin's. I can't go to the supermarket without people talking about their disdain for the homicidal digital lynch mob viciously terrorizing Gov. Palin and her family.

I have never trusted the media and always believed them to be liberally biased. But I always approached these sentiments with a little introspection and skepticism in the event that it was my ideological perception rather than the actual facts.

But after this weeks homicidal ravaging of terror on the Palin family in US Weekly, in other publications, and on television, I'm quite comfortable with my conclusion that, yes, the media are terrorists, dishonest, bias, and filled with charlatan political hacks.

I plan on boycotting every store in my city with US Weekly on their media racks. I have already contacted Walmart, and other stores and they all agree with me that US Weekly is using terrorist tactics against a family for political reasons.

Make no mistake, American's have never been this repulsed by the media, and in this case, US Weekly, in this country and they see this as not only an assault on Sarah Palin and her family. They see it as an assault on them.

I urge you to pull this terrorism on an innocent family. Otherwise I will mount an orchestrated campaign against US Weekly and call for boycotts of your publication all across my state. And don't think I don't have the influence. I own a chain of preschools and have US Weekly readers as not only my employees, but also as customers.

Again, if US Weekly thinks this is legitimate than they must agree with al qaeda's terrorist tactics as well. And for American's al qaeda is their enemy.

Thank you for your time and have a great day.

Sincerely,

22 posted on 09/03/2008 8:46:18 AM PDT by coffee260 (coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Looks as if they have distored her face slightly too.

She looks some what evil. Thanks U.S. Weekly.

Never will I allow that magainze in my home again.


23 posted on 09/03/2008 8:46:24 AM PDT by rlferny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Here is contact information for US Magazine. Let them know how you feel:

Janice Min, Editor-in-Chief
Victoria Lasdon Rose, Publisher
Scott Willett, Associate Publisher
Jon Tuck, Advertising Director

New York
1290 Ave. of the Americas
New York, NY 10104
Phone 212-484-1616. Fax 212-484-4242.
Nina Levine (Entertainment Director) nina.levine@usmagazine.com
Andi Rimas (Account Manager) andi.rimas@usmagazine.com
Erica Shlafer (Fashion Account Manager) erica.shlafer@usmagazine.com
Kate Solinsky (Account Manager) kate.solinsky@usmagazine.com
Jon Spellman (Account Manager) jon.spellman@usmagazine.com
Michele Goldenberg (Direct Response Account Manager) michele.goldenberg@usmagazine.com
Sabrina Ng (Direct Response Account Manager) sabrina.ng@usmagazine.com

http://www.srds.com/mediakits/us_weekly/contact.html


24 posted on 09/03/2008 8:46:33 AM PDT by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
How can they can sit there with a straight face and honestly say there not biased...do they really believe the garbage they shovel to us everyday. The MSM journalist et al are the most biased group of individuals and they have the nerve to say we'd miss em if they were gone. Me...I wouldn't miss um one bit!
25 posted on 09/03/2008 8:48:55 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants (Audaces fortuna iuvat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

US Magazine does not deserve to own a printing press or license one, this is the most biased cover i have ever seen.

MSM, keep pushing our buttons, keep attacking children and their mother, keep it up and see what happens.


26 posted on 09/03/2008 8:49:10 AM PDT by aft_lizard (One animal actually its eats its own brains to conserve energy, we call them liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

contact info for US Weekly, including phone and email:

ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES AND BRANCH OFFICES


Janice Min, Editor-in-Chief
Victoria Lasdon Rose, Publisher
Scott Willett, Associate Publisher
Jon Tuck, Advertising Director

New York
1290 Ave. of the Americas
New York, NY 10104
Phone 212-484-1616. Fax 212-484-4242.
Nina Levine (Entertainment Director) nina.levine@usmagazine.com
Andi Rimas (Account Manager) andi.rimas@usmagazine.com
Erica Shlafer (Fashion Account Manager) erica.shlafer@usmagazine.com
Kate Solinsky (Account Manager) kate.solinsky@usmagazine.com
Jon Spellman (Account Manager) jon.spellman@usmagazine.com
Michele Goldenberg (Direct Response Account Manager) michele.goldenberg@usmagazine.com
Sabrina Ng (Direct Response Account Manager) sabrina.ng@usmagazine.com

Los Angeles
5700 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 345
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Phone 323-930-3300. Fax 323-935-4214.
Lee Zellweger (West Coast Director) lee.zellweger@usmagazine.com
Greg Fox (Los Angeles Manager) greg.fox@usmagazine.com
Melinda Carson (Account Manager) melinda.carson@usmagazine.com

Chicago
333 N. Michigan Ave., Ste. 707
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone 312-782-2366. Fax 312-782-5677.
Maureen Harrison (Midwest Director) maureen.harrison@usmagazine.com
Courtney Lawson (Account Manager) courtney.lawson@usmagazine.com
Chris Svoboda (Midwest Manager) christopher.svoboda@usmagazine.com

San Francisco
1700 Montgomery St., Ste. 207
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone 415-788-7625. Fax 415-788-0925.
Holly Jones (Account Manager) holly.jones@usmagazine.com

Detroit
201 West Big Beaver Road, Ste. 1230
Troy, MI 48084
Phone 248-743-1020. Fax 248-740-9446.
Brian Green (Account Director) brian.green@wennermedia.com

South
Phone 212-484-3470.
Scott Willett (Associate Publisher)


27 posted on 09/03/2008 8:50:38 AM PDT by KeatsforFirstDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Thought I would send over our Us Weekly/Sarah Palin cover story, on stands Friday, if helpful in your coverage. Might be useful as an illustration of how the news is playing out.(Us Weekly has 12 million, mostly female readers)

So, does this email that indicates coordination mean that Us Weekly is making an in-kind donation to the Obama campaign? Do they need to file paperwork with the FTC?

That's 12 million copies of this photo that they're proud of spreading on Obama's behalf, and asking the rest of the media to coordinate reporting around it.

-PJ

28 posted on 09/03/2008 8:51:18 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (You can never over-estimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?; Miss Didi; penelopesire; rodguy911; SE Mom; Doctor Raoul; LUV W; NordP; ...
How true ... it's all canned, calculated spin and subliminal MSM support for Obama. I was SO glad to hear that McCain abruptly his appearance on Larry King Live because of Campbell Brown's invasive questioning of Tucker Bounds, asserting that she crossed the line. She did.

***

Campbell Brown Interview Leads McCain to Cancel CNN Appearance ~~~ VIDEO HERE ALSO)

Will CNN's Campbell Brown go down as the next Dan Rather in the halls of liberal bias infamy?

That seems highly possible now after watching Brown's interview with John McCain strategist Tucker Bounds in which she repeatedly attacked Bounds over Sarah Palin's supposed lack of qualifications.

The highly charged exchange (which was very much in keeping with Brown's long record of attacking Palin) led the GOP camp to cancel an interview that John McCain was set to do last night with CNN's Larry King.

Full transcript of the Brown-Bounds exchange below the jump as well as CNN's later reference to it last night.

~~~~

I wonder what her hubby, our former Coalition spokesman in Iraq, thinks ... or if he's a flaming liberal, too.

29 posted on 09/03/2008 8:51:20 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Check out the comparison of the two US magazine covers (warm and fuzzy Obama cover vs. "scandal and lies" Palin cover). Absolutely despicable.

Be sure to read STARWISE's post #1...

30 posted on 09/03/2008 8:52:20 AM PDT by nutmeg (Imagine Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama... appointing US Supreme Court justices)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeatsforFirstDog

and here are there sponsors (copied from a post in us in protest):

“Proctor and Gamble can be reached at 800-568-4035. They are responsible for Cover Girl, Crest, Olay as well as a a lot of the other ads in this POS.

Neutrogena can be reached at 1-800-582-4048.

Coca Cola consumer relations can be reached at (404)676-5009.

GSK can be reached at 888-825-5249.”


31 posted on 09/03/2008 8:53:30 AM PDT by KeatsforFirstDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KeatsforFirstDog

Was just coming to post this info..

Thanks!!


32 posted on 09/03/2008 8:54:48 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Proctor and Gamble can be reached at 800-568-4035. They are responsible for Cover Girl, Crest, Olay as well as a a lot of the other ads in this POS.

Neutrogena can be reached at 1-800-582-4048.

Coca Cola consumer relations can be reached at (404)676-5009.

GSK can be reached at 888-825-5249.


33 posted on 09/03/2008 8:55:41 AM PDT by kinghorse (Selecting Palin took the guts of a fighter pilot landing on the deck of a carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling

P(US) magazine outrage mark


34 posted on 09/03/2008 8:56:02 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (No way, No how, NObama! *************McCain/Palin 08************)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeatsforFirstDog

oops.
viral.


35 posted on 09/03/2008 8:56:44 AM PDT by kinghorse (Selecting Palin took the guts of a fighter pilot landing on the deck of a carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KeatsforFirstDog

This will NOT go unanswered, US. Count on it.

BTTT.


36 posted on 09/03/2008 8:56:45 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Axelrod must have missed their monthly payment to Drudge. I’ve noticed he’s climbed out of the Obama tank the past few days. He’s been focusing on the blatant media bias. This bodes well.


37 posted on 09/03/2008 8:57:36 AM PDT by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
And now the Enquirer:


38 posted on 09/03/2008 8:58:01 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

WOW! Not even sure what to say, which is odd for me.


39 posted on 09/03/2008 8:58:30 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

WOW === 3804 comments!!!

Fantastic .... ! Women, mothers, Americans ... are standing up to them. This is very heartening and encouraging.

Thanks for that .. ;)


40 posted on 09/03/2008 8:58:30 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Interesting, I posted the same covers over on RunnerWorld earlier today:
http://forums.runnersworld.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/677106477/m/9501077535

PS: My real name is Daffy Duck


41 posted on 09/03/2008 8:59:54 AM PDT by Bulwinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I’m shooting off emails now! Thanks for the posting!


42 posted on 09/03/2008 9:00:25 AM PDT by aragona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I’m shooting off emails now! Thanks for the posting!


43 posted on 09/03/2008 9:00:33 AM PDT by aragona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Excellent!


44 posted on 09/03/2008 9:01:15 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That IS a backlash!


45 posted on 09/03/2008 9:01:16 AM PDT by kallisti ("Do not do an immoral thing for moral reasons.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carling
Also, the abuser/ex-husband was not fired.

That is true. But Trooper Wooten's supervisor, Walter Monegan was fired by Palin allegedly because Monegan refused to fire Wooten. That is what the investigations in Alaska involving Palin are about.

While I don't like the press getting the information wrong, in this case I don't think their getting it right would be of any greater help to Palin. The outcome of those Alaskan investigations are due on October 31, four days before the election. This really could be a huge problem for McCain's campaign. I'm just saying...

46 posted on 09/03/2008 9:02:07 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland (BTW, I am a woman :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aragona
TRUTH IN ADVERTISING, US WEEKLY NEEDS TO COME CLEAN WITH THE PUBLIC, AND TELL THE TRUTH!

That they are a partisan mag, who gives money and supports Democrats on their front page.

(my email to them)

47 posted on 09/03/2008 9:04:50 AM PDT by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Her argument was that Sarah being scrutinized far more than men would ever be. No contest with that.

I'll contest that. Women don't always have it worse than men by virtue of their sex alone. Any Republican candidate has always been scrutinized more (and more unfairly) than any Democrat candidate has. If say Pawlenty was the pick instead of Palin we still would be having the same number of press bias conversations IMO.

48 posted on 09/03/2008 9:05:14 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland (BTW, I am a woman :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard; All
From Jan Wenner's other pub, Rolling Stone .. current cover:


49 posted on 09/03/2008 9:05:26 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I wonder how the FCC/Election Commission looks at that type of
conspiracy.


50 posted on 09/03/2008 9:06:38 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson