Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpanther

Come on, please share some details!


13 posted on 09/03/2008 2:59:00 PM PDT by netmilsmom (If John's McCain's spirit was not broken by the Hanoi Hilton, it won't be by the angry left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

Every time the editor would try to lie to her, she’d call him on it. He didn’t handle it well. She really called him on the carpet about things like how the magazine failed to mention that Todd Palin’s DUI was 22 years ago, even though the editor claimed they did mention it. Meg rocks!


33 posted on 09/03/2008 3:02:21 PM PDT by rivercat (Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Megan had the article in one hand and a broadsword in the other. Parts were flying, lies were dying.


35 posted on 09/03/2008 3:02:53 PM PDT by Tarpon (Three things matter when selecting a President character, character and character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Megyn pointed out that they never went into detail on what her brother-in-law had done to his step-son, the threats or anything. All they reported on were the allegations against her. There was another issue in the segment I saw but don’t recall what it was. In both cases, the prissy boy stated it was a “balanced” article in which they did not have room for all the details. Naturally, the details they left out were favorable to Sarah Palin.

The prissy boy could only say “read the article”, “read the article”. Smarmy, elusive, and way in over his head with Megyn Kelly.


38 posted on 09/03/2008 3:03:44 PM PDT by bcsco (Palin runs a state. Obama runs...from his ties to Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

She went point by point through the things the article claimed, starting with the title: ‘ Babies Lies & Scandal’\by asking “What Lies?”..He tyried to play it off like the lies they were talking about, were the ones the Left Wing Hate Sites had been slinging over the weekend...to which, the next question was, Where on the cover does it give any indication that the lies were not Palins?...it got even more direct, as the body of the story was questioned. The Us editor, tried to play it off like it was a balanced article, but it was pointed out that many of the slanders were not given any rebuttal space from Palins defenders.

She tore his flimsy defense of the smear piece to shreds. >B-)


46 posted on 09/03/2008 3:06:50 PM PDT by DGHoodini (Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

FoxNews was alerting viewers to the fact that soon the US weekly editor would be on to defend their BLATANTLY biased rag in supermarket checkout lines.

They showed one cover that showed obamaNation and his family in a great light of course...

then the next cover with Palin and her family with obvious scandalous headlines...

and she tore him completely out of his frame! He not only got caught lying but the dumbass said he “didn’t have ENOUGH TIME” to address all those you know....ACCURACY issues...

Another freeper had listed links to this rag...we should re-email them telling them, “Ummmmmm we’re very UNimpressed with their performance to come clean”!!!!

As I said, I’ve never so much as picked one up, but...


55 posted on 09/03/2008 3:10:07 PM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing-----Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson