Skip to comments.Why Sarah Palin's Speech Will Not Win Over All Evangelicals
Posted on 09/04/2008 7:58:19 AM PDT by mathprof
I teach at a Catholic university. I study and write about evangelical Protestants. I have no religious convictions of my own. This bothers people who insist that if you are not yourself religious you cannot possibly "get" religion. I leave it to others to decide whether my lack of faith helps or hinders my capacity to understand the subject. But I do know one thing. Because of where I teach and who I study, I have come across some remarkable people I otherwise would never have met.
Familiar with the Catholic tradition, I cannot say I am surprised to meet learned Catholics with a deeply honed sense of social justice. But I have been taken aback by how many evangelicals to whom I have spoken who think deeply about the obligations we human beings have toward each other, take seriously a command to lead lives of good purpose, and resist having their faith corrupted by the temptations of money and power. Megachurches and Christian colleges and seminaries have more than their share of people who love God and want to make the world a better place.
Sarah Palin's speech last night was rapturously received by the delegates to the Republican convention, most of whom are conservative Christians. But just because most Republicans are conservative Christians does not mean that all conservative Christians are Republican. I have the feeling that Palin's speech will not wear well among many of the primarily younger evangelicals I have come to know.
To be sure, Palin's personal story will resonate with them, especially the story of Trig. (At one evangelical event in Atlanta I attended, I was bowled over by the parents of a quadriplegic child to whom they had clearly devoted their lives; I do not think I have the same level of devotion within me). But three aspects of Palin's speech are likely to bother them.
Evangelicals are becoming increasingly persuaded that Christians are under an injunction to preserve and protect the natural environment bequeathed to us by God. They will not be attracted to destroying the beauty of Alaska to fill our all-too- human urge to drive cars. Christians are from time to time called on to sacrifice for their beliefs, and if we have to cut back our energy consumption to protect God's gift, that is as worthy a sacrifice as there is. Palin rhetorically called for clean energy but her words lacked conviction, especially when compared to her calls to drill and drill some more. This will be noticed.
Palin's speech, secondly, was too partisan to be easily swallowed by younger, post-partisan, evangelicals. These are people who disagree with Barack Obama's position on abortion but respect him as a Christian. Palin's over-the-top sarcasm toward Obama will not play well with them, especially her implicit questioning of his patriotism. To the extent that these younger evangelicals are political, they look for a politics of elevation. The whole tone of last night's convention will prove to be a bit too sour. You do not call for change and adhere to the Rove-Schmitt style of attack.
Finally, and most importantly, Palin did not speak to the powerful sense emerging among evangelicals that all Christians, and not just Catholics, should do their best to insure social justice in this world. On the contrary, Palin mocked Obama's service as a community organizer, an odd thing to do given that so many community organizers are inspired by their religious convictions. Promising to cut taxes appeals to country-club Republicans. It is not nearly as resonant a theme to those who understand that the programs financed by taxes help the neediest and most dependent. If Palin said one word about how to make this world a fairer place or indicated at any point how to realize the common good, I did not hear it.
This is the moment for Sarah Palin to have her day. But great speeches are meant to be digested over long periods. This is not one that future generations of evangelicals will turn to for inspiration.
Alan Wolfe is a TNR contributing editor and director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life at Boston College.
Alan Wolfe is yet another lib defining what “evangelicals” believe and think and then explaining why Palin doesn’t fit “our” mold.
He is so wrong. He couldn’t be wronger!
And Obama’s didn’t win over all Democrats...So what’s the f’ing point Alan?
I have no religious convictions of my own.
I feel sorry for the students who have learn from this lamebrain.
I have 5 very liberal... did I say very liberal women who go to church with me. They sent out an email this morning saying to make sure we all vote. I sent back a reply.. I will vote and I am very anxious to vote for the McCain/Palin ticket. Funny thing I have not had any replies back to me. I was the only Republican on the email and all others HUGE libs.
So they're not upset that Barack supports murder, but they will be upset that big bad Sarah said baaaad things about him?
“...the powerful sense emerging among evangelicals that all Christians, and not just Catholics, should do their best to insure social justice in this world.”
“Social justice” is just another term for socialism/communism. I’ll take that old time religion myself- the Lord helps those who help themselves.
And I find it hard to believe that anyone who is completely irreligious can "get" religion -- but, o.k., I'll judge him on his conclusions as he requests.
It's clear from his conclusions that he doesn't "get" religion at all.
No kidding, I stopped reading afte the first sentence, no wonder C is so messed up, sorry, but true, spoken as a former C
Bunk, her life example will win people of all kinds over.
The speeches are just tasty frosting on the cake.
What's she doing giving a partisan speech at a party convention? Geez, what a lamebrain!
An assertion without any to back it up.
most of whom are conservative Christians.
NOTHING from the New Republic is to ever be believed.
1. the environment,
2. abortion, and
3. social justice.
Liberalism wearing a fake collar.
Catholics are going to be the toughest contingency for Obama to win over. Definitely not going to happen now.
I understand now...
Alan Wolfe - was a member of the collective that put out the Marxist-oriented journal, Kapitalistate, whose pages featured articles by such writers as Poulantzas, Claus Offe, Ralph Miliband, and Bob Jessop. By the early 1980s, Wolfe's politics had become more centrist.
A contributing editor of The New Republic, The Wilson Quarterly, Commonwealth Magazine, and In Character, Wolfe writes often for those publications as well as for Commonweal, The New York Times, Harper's, The Atlantic Monthly, The Washington Post, and other magazines and newspapers. He served as an advisor to President Bill Clinton in preparation for his 1995 State of the Union Address...
what is a “C”, why and how is it messed up, and why are you a former “C”?
LMAO... the New Republic is now an expert on Evangelicals!
LOL, very funny.
“...I cannot say I am surprised to meet learned Catholics with a deeply honed sense of social justice.”
Social justice. That’s all I needed to know about this guys opinion.
True enough but to add one bit to it, one can not support abortion and be a Christian.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
I am a white, conservative, middle class evangelical.
I think I will write a column on how Barak Obama cannot win over the votes of homeless, cross-dressing African Americans.
“I have no religious convictions of my own. “
I love the pretentious condescending I speak for you tone of this author
LOL. I am sure evangelicals are more drawn to Barry and his worldview than those of Palin.
Sure. She REALLY has them worried. They probably had already paid for renovations to the White House. I hear they were going for a Temple of Delphi theme.
Complete with smoke machine and a theatrical lift system so that Barry can be lowered down from the Heavens when meeting with foreign leaders.
I have no idea why people seem to believe they are all Conservative. It just makes no sense at all.
These liberal believers actually think Jesus was a liberal reformer, so there ya go.........
I am sorry, but I don’t do “religion”.
“I teach at a Catholic university. I study and write about evangelical Protestants. I have no religious convictions of my own.”
“Why would someone with no religious convictions want to teach at a Catholic university?” I asked myself. Then I saw that this was Boston College...no Catholic university it.
I’m not an evangelical, nor do I play one on TV, but I think this guy is out to lunch.
First of all, the headline: Of course her speech won’t win over ALL evangelicals. That was never in question. That’s as stupid as saying one Obama speech can win over ALL African-Americans.
To the specifics: I don’t recall Sarah Palin saying that we should be “destroying the beauty of Alaska to fill our all-too- human urge to drive cars.” This moron seems to think Palin called for oil derricks to be set up across 100% of Alaska’s pristene, scenic landscape. ANWR is not pristene or scenic, nobody sees it but a bunch of caribou, and we’re only talking about a small percentage of land there, anyway.
This was a political convention. Conventions are, by their very nature, partisan. There’s a news flash for you. Go back and watch Biden’s speech. Or Obama’s. Do you hear any partisanship there? But, I guess THAT won’t turn off evangelicals, because evangelicals like leftist partisanship. And when did Palin “implicit[ly] question... [Obama’s] patriotism.”? I’m not sure what speech this guy was watching.
Finally, how is a “community organizer” working for social justice? Isn’t he, rather, working to build up a voting base and curry favors? Most Catholics, evangelicals, and any other Christians who want to work for the benefit of their communities do so through charitable works that their Church performs. They don’t spend their time registering Democrats to vote.
Well, at least this is on the issues. He’s not calling for the death of her child and grandchild.
It must be those Christians who agree with Hebrews 11:6 "And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him."
Who is Alan Wolfe?
Earlier in his career, Wolfe was a member of the collective that put out the Marxist-oriented journal, Kapitalistate, whose pages featured articles by such writers as Poulantzas, Claus Offe, Ralph Miliband, and Bob Jessop. By the early 1980s, Wolfe’s politics had become more centrist.
“I teach at a Catholic university.”
Boston College is not Catholic—it is Jesuit...Has their theology dept signed JPII’s mandatum???
What they really are is a pack of lesbians that want to be nuns and leftist that want to use “social justice” as a mechanism to promote left wing causes.
I'm a Roman Catholic and I'll throw my lot in with the Baptist and the Assemblies of God and the REAL evangelical faiths any day.
This twit comes across as a self-styled Margaret Mead studying traditional Christians as if they are exotic primitive tribal people. The Catholic University system has been infected with the black mold of secular humanism. How tragic.
He is surprised to find out evangelicals and other Christians are concerned for the environment and their fellowmen and women? He clearly doesn’t understand the Christian faith. The difference between liberals and Christians is that liberals work toward their ideals by imposing their ideas of paradise on the people through taxation, restrictive laws, intimidation and other equally repugnant means—all in the pursuit of their “worthy goals” of course. Christians follow the dictates of their Founder by working to change the hearts of their brothers and sisters and thereby indirectly contributing to a more just, kind and sensible citizenry. As one Christian leader stated, “we take the slum out of the person and he takes himself out of the slum” and this is accomplished by example, love, respect and patience rather than force.
“These are people who disagree with Barack Obama’s position on abortion but respect him as a Christian.”
All three of them have doubts about Sarah, but they should come around.
“But I have been taken aback by how many evangelicals to whom I have spoken who think deeply about the obligations we human beings have toward each other, take seriously a command to lead lives of good purpose, and resist having their faith corrupted by the temptations of money and power.”
This “teacher” is a dufus!
The dopes are coming out of the woodwork.
Someone with Obama's position on abortion is NOT a Christian. Period. It doesn't matter what he considers himself. It's what God thinks of him.
Alan Wolfe is a fool and a liar as well, but that's obvious.
He claims also, and perhaps not surprisingly, that he didn't expect evangelicals to be supporting charity. ????
His immediate hatred of conservatives (see it in his language and terms such as “country-club”) show that he has NO understanding of what he (claims to) be teaching. I cannot imagine any more of a waste of time, money, and ink than to take a course in religion under a “man” who claims to have no religion.
But one who worships the god earth anyway. Who cannot see Obama’s lies for they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.