Culture war is right.
Soon you wont be able to say ANYTHING about homosexual marriage.
If you do, you will be liable to be nailed to a cross over it. (it is coming)
Party A and Party B
Why not just Comrade?
Y’all are in the center of wacko-land. My prayers are with you.
I hope you all don't think this is just politically correct speak. There is a lot more to this verbage change and homosexuality is the red herring.
THIS is about changing parental rights with children to STAKEHOLDERS.
In the United States, courts often must determine who the legal parents are among the many adults who might be involved in planning, conceiving, birthing, and raising a child. Judges in several states have seized upon the idea of psychological parenthood to award legal parent status to adults who are not related to children by blood, adoption, or marriage. They have done so even over the objection of the childs biological parent. Advances in the same-sex marriage debate have encouraged group marriage advocates who wish to break open the two-person understanding of marriage and parenthood.
The National Health Education Standards has gone further and envoked in loco parentis by redefining parents as families. Families have been classified as stakeholders. Childrens stakeholders are being identified as any entity that is seen as a resource in a childs community. The legal definition of stakeholder is a third party who temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined.
I think they should make it multiple choice. Groom/Butch Lesbian/Gay male #1/Animal Fetishist on one line and Bride/Lipstick Lesbian/Pansy/Girlyman/Animal’s name and species on the next.
Yes, this is pathetic but I think this particular incident is less a bias in favor of gay marriage and more a bias in favor of bureaucracy and the general rule that one does not alter an officially-recorded vital record form. There is a battle to be fought but this is a minor skirmish compared to the main conflicts. The best approach, to me, would be to have legislation authorizing two different official forms or a form which permitted the parties to specifically designate Partner A or B or Bride or Groom. Yes, the gay mafia would fight it but it would overcome the near impregnable refusal of bureaucrats to change a procedure.
And the MSM and Lefties wonder why Governor Palin is such a hit.....
Fruit and Loop?
Obviously a narrow-minded, un-inclusive ruling
- Where is “Party A/C” and “Party D/C?”
I am a BRIDE - period! The MAN marrying me is a GROOM - period! This town is sick in the head! This sickness must be ended once and for all. MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN A HUMAN MAN AND A HUMAN FEMALE - period! I don’t care what you do in your bedroom, legislating for you is out of the question - period!
Help stop these evil doers from making themselves more equal than the rest of us.
Party A and Party B.
Do not insert Tab A into Slot B. Just get some Scotch tape and afix two Tab As together I guess.
Californicators leading our way to Sodom.
so the state of california is now messing with teh establishment and free exercise clause.
bring on the federal suits.