How many times, when signing a legal document, have you demanded the legal documents not refer to the parties as parties? What!!!!!????? Never? Shocking.
The pastor did not have to, nor did he, refer to them as Party A and Party B. So they were not ever going to be known as Party A / Party B.
That you think of anal sex in this context is more than a bit disturbing.
The gay agenda is the reason why "Bride" and "Groom" were changed to "Party A" and "Party B." The ONLY reason.
Are you sure you're on the right forum?
A bride is a woman. A groom is a man. Same goes for mother and father. Aside from those two examples, in most legal documents it doesn't matter what gender either party is.
Your argument holds no water and leads me to believe that you're either a liberal, or worse, a lawyer.
Contracts/covenants for “bride” and “groom” have been around a lot longer than those for “Party A” and “Party B” (unless we’re talking about segregated reception parties).
Of course, not recognizing that the marriage contract is significantly special enough to warrant its own unique and permanent nomenclature is a sure sign that people don’t understand marriage.