Posted on 09/13/2008 10:12:28 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg
He says question about when a baby is entitled to human rights is ‘tough’
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
He is flippant. And the more America sees him, the less they like him. He’s 47 and an immature punk. He has no “gravitas”. ;-)
“He says question about when a baby is entitled to human rights is ‘tough’”
Which means, Barry, you’ve got no business and certainly no qualifications that entitle you to be fooling around with that question. And you sure don’t belong in any position to have any sort of influence over how that question is answered.
What’s so tough about deciding when a baby is entitled to human rights? If a baby is a human being, then he/she is entitled to those rights.
Barry, may I suggest you use the same criteria used by the homosexual activists. Those activists are on the verge of forcing homosexual marriage on our culture due to their insistence that they be treated equally, no matter what happens to definitions of marriage and family. And you agree with their point of view. So why not use the same criteria, and say that an unborn baby should be treated equally, no matter what upheavals it causes with the Daily Kos, DU, Huffington Post crowd?????
He will soon add a little ‘flop’ to his ‘flip’.
Don’t forget, he taught constitutional law.
He's an leftist, elitist petty snob and treasonous, perfidious poseur and self-righteous nanny fascist.
And another thing,.......
If he wins, we are doomed. Kiss freedom goodbye.
“Can’t I just eat my waffle?”
..this has to be the 1,162 do-over this clown has had since 2007
The damage is done.
Can you imagine if Palin had answered that way?
Folks, he’s getting away with a fast one here. The Democrats have for years.
Personhood and conception is NOT a theological issue! It’s not. It’s BIOLOGICAL. It’s SCIENCE. Every embryologist in the world knows when life begins - at fertilization.
0bama’s answer says “probably”, but he never says it was “flip”, that is the interviewers term, once again, 0bama gives a long winded non-answer;
.
Asked on Sunday whether the “above my pay grade” answer was too flip, Obama said: “Probably. ...What I intended to say is that, as a Christian, I have a lot of humility about understanding when does the soul enter into ... It’s a pretty tough question.
“And so, all I meant to communicate was that I don’t presume to be able to answer these kinds of theological questions,” he said in an interview broadcast Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”
I once asked a Ultra-Feminist, who not only wants Abortions legal but the Government to pay for all costs, if she would be offended if I were to invent a time machine and go back and convince her mother to abort her.
I've never witnessed such a melt down.
My only regret is I wish I would have had the forethought to record her reaction.
Maybe the professor can flip to the part of the Constitution the contains the "penumbra" in which the SCOTUS found the right to kill babies .
So, this is his calculated “counter attack”? Wow, I’m impressed....NOT.
You can't label it flip. It was idiotic.
And it's not that HE said it. I would consider anyone who said that, in the situation in which it was said, totally incompetent to be president.
So, this is his calculated “counter attack”? Wow, I’m impressed....NOT.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Q: When is a baby is entitled to human rights?
BHO: Present.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.