Posted on 09/13/2008 2:31:06 PM PDT by euroatlantic
What Europeans are Saying about Sarah Palin
Europeans have greeted the news of Sarah Palin’s nomination for Vice President of the United States with a predictable mixture of anger, frustration, resentment and resignation. After more than a year of uncritically praising Barack Obama as a supernatural figure destined by fate to solve all of the world’s problems, European elites are suddenly coming to terms with the unwelcome possibility that the junior senator from Illinois might just be another human being after all.
European commentary on Sarah Palin has ranged from ridicule, to ridicule, to more ridicule, to reluctant acknowledgment that Barack Obama may have met his match. In any case, many European elites are sensing that the Democratic presidential candidate, by failing to pick US Senator Hillary Clinton as his running mate, may have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
A common theme running through much of European commentary is that Palin lacks qualifications; it is a critique European elites could, but will not, apply to Obama, presumably because he is a Democrat, and thus ideologically acceptable to Europe’s enlightened class. Many Europeans lament that Palin is (according to Europeans) pushing the US presidential election into a battle of values rather than of policies, as if there is any real substance to Obama.
But if there is one single aspect to Sarah Palin that threatens the smug certitude of Europe’s secular gatekeepers, it is her Christian faith. It therefore comes as no big surprise that Europe’s media elites have directed the bulk of their fury at American evangelical Christian voters. As if European secularism is not also a religion.
What follows is a brief survey of what some of Europe’s leading newspapers are saying about Sarah Palin.
Ireland’s most prestigious newspaper, the Irish Times, runs a headline that says: “Just a heartbeat away from the biggest half-baked Alaskan nightmare.” Another article titled “Palin the latest torch bearer for anti-science” asks: “Who literally believes that Jonah made his home in a whale’s abdomen? Nobody really, apart from the US president—and the woman who was recently added to the 2008 Republican ticket…. Sarah Palin is the latest politician to carry the torch of science misinformation tainted by religious dogma lit during the Reagan administration and nurtured by George Bush…. Yet centuries after the Enlightenment, Sarah Palin, the putative US vice-president, can endorse the passing off of Bible stories as scientific facts, dressed up as the oxymoronic term ‘creationist science’.” And just in case the paper’s editors were not being absolutely clear about their choice for US president, yet another article proclaims: “Obama embodies the future King dreamt about.”
Britain’s leftwing Guardian newspaper tries to figure out “How to solve the Sarah Palin problem.” Another story titled “Sarah Palin’s war against information” asserts that “The McCain team knows that if the media do their job and give Palin the same scrutiny that any candidate for high office must endure, she will collapse.” Still another story warns that “Obama faces lurking forces of darkness.”
The London-based Financial Times admits that “Palin erodes Obama’s monopoly on change.” Elsewhere, the paper warns that “Democrats dismiss Palin at their peril.” According to France’s center-right Le Figaro, Palin will “trigger the eruption of moral intolerance in the campaign.” This is actually rather funny, because French elites are notoriously tolerant with everyone, except for those who do not agree with them.
In keeping with the policies versus values theme, the Paris-based leftwing Le Monde says “The choice of Ms Palin has turned the centrist John McCain into the ‘heir to Bush’.” And the weekly newsmagazine Le Point calls Palin “the fanatic of the American heartland.” It describes her speech to the Republican Convention as a “declaration of war [on the] Democrats as well as on the media and elites who dare to raise doubts about her ability to serve as vice-president of the United States.”
Germany’s leftwing Der Spiegel takes special delight in mocking Palin’s religious beliefs: “Sarah Palin’s Pentacostalist [sic] past explains a lot about what she says in public, but the McCain campaign wants to play it down. Can a gas pipeline really be a manifestation of God’s will?.... Sarah Palin has shown a habit of investing secular matters with religious meaning…. Palin acts as though all political decisions emanated directly from a divine resolution—and as if the Republican understanding of this resolution were the only one that could be correct.”
The Berlin-based left-leaning Die Tageszeitung says: “With the nomination of Sarah Palin as vice-presidential candidate, John McCain took on exactly what Obama avoided at all costs with Biden: A much-talked-about risk. McCain/Palin—this is where real life romps.” Another columnist writes: Sarah Palin “has a closed, conservative—in part reactionary—worldview. The coordinates of her value system are well known: Family, military strength, small government, a confident America. But there is a new face to these traditional values. This is a great attraction…. This competition is an unexpected threat for Barack Obama.”
The center-right Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung runs an article about “Superwoman Palin” titled “Supermama” which argues that: “There is absolutely nothing wrong with ultra-conservative Republicans, amid their otherwise steadfast evangelical certainly, to make a U-turn. In the past for instance, when dealing with a mother of five and soon-to-be grandmother, they would not have been so quick and would even have considered it reckless to advise her to take on a job as well, let alone one of such importance.”
The Financial Times Deutschland greets the news of Palin’s ascent with unabashed hostility: “McCain’s hubris and irresponsibility are by now blatant. Hubris, because only a belief in his own immortality for the next four years could justify the choice of a vice president whose only experience, aside from two years as governor of Alaska, was as mayor of a suburb of Anchorage. Irresponsibility, because US presidents run a high risk of being attacked, as exemplified by John F Kennedy’s assassination, as well as by the attack on Ronald Reagan. Imagine what would happen if a President McCain were shot…The world would wake up the next morning to a President Palin…. More has been publicized in the last few days about Palin’s person and family than about her views on domestic and foreign politics, which shows neither the American intellectual condition nor their public media in the best light. A preacher moderated the first debate between presidential nominees Obama and McCain during which they had to answer questions on faith and how they would handle the evil bad guys of the world. A politician whose attitude toward war and peace are largely a mystery could become president in five months, and people discuss the implications of her daughter’s pregnancy. The country where all this is happening is the most powerful in the world. But for how much longer?”
The Munich-based, left-leaning Süddeutsche Zeitung assures its readers that: “McCain used to look like an ideal candidate for the party. The conservative free-spirit repeatedly defied the current president and thereby emanated seriousness and self-assurance…. Sarah Palin threatens to demolish [McCain’s] halo…. The lingering impression [is] that McCain called this fresh face to his side purely out of strategic campaign calculations…. Palin’s selection comes across as imprudent, unserious and, yes, dangerous…. McCain has miscalculated: those Democrats who were disappointed by Hillary’s failure and might possibly have voted for the Republican veteran will hardly be lured by the ultraconservative pro-lifer…. McCain only hopes that the evangelical base will gather behind him with new fury. That is important, but not enough to win the election in November. The payoff for this deputy from the right is less than the price of the risk that McCain runs with the center. Sarah Palin will cost the Republican Party dearly.”
Meanwhile, Germany’s center-right Die Welt, considered by many to be one of the country’s better daily newspapers, offers a trite 15-question online Sarah Palin Quiz. Question 1: “Do you know Sarah Palin’s current job?” Question 2: “Do you know the name of Palin’s underage daughter, the one who is pregnant?” Question 3: “What revelations have become public about Sarah Palin?” Answer A: “She likes to wear latex and leather”; Answer B: “As a child, she once stole a lollypop”; Answer C: “Her husband was arrested for drunk driving”; Answer D: “She first wanted to be a Democrat.”
Spain’s leftwing El País newspaper reports that Sarah Palin is “a figure who comes from the America that is farthest removed from, and incomprehensible to, the European spectator…[who] represents values and policy proposals…the outlawing of abortion, the preponderance of religious faith, the supremacy of the traditional family, the subjection of the State to individual initiative...”
Spain’s conservative ABC newspaper runs an opinion essay titled “Obama Who Art in Heaven” which says that Sarah Palin “seems to be treacherously undermining the huge dose of goodwill that European public opinion has devoted to Obama. Now the governor of Alaska, a member of the National Rifle Association, who promotes her state as the land of hunters, is the exact opposite of Barack Obama.” Palin represents and America that is “wild, fundamentalist and a practitioner of lynching” while Obama represents an America that is “archangelic and cosmopolitan” because, for millions of Europeans, Obama “represents the antipode of the death penalty and the free access to guns.” There is a “vast divide between the intellectual sophistication of ‘The New York Review of Books’ and the mass consumption in the commercial emporium of Wal-Mart. Those divides are nothing less than the reality of the United States: the Harvard of Obama the angry and prosperous Alaska of Sarah Palin.”
ABC then pauses for an odd moment of reflection: “Our old error is prejudging rather than trying to understand. That is why we never forgive the United States while we absolve every other country in the world…. Even if Europeans believe otherwise; Obama is not in heaven, but in the middle of a presidential campaign.” Thanks, ABC, for the reminder.
The Barcelona-based La Vanguardia writes that “Palin can sell what no candidate other can offer: a boring and hardscrabble American life. Not only is Palin ‘one of ours,’ according to enthusiastic Republican voters, who have awakened from their slumber with unusual force, but she could be anyone’s niece. A real peanut butter girl.” The newspaper concludes: “Undoubtedly, of all of the surprises of this campaign, [Palin] is the most brilliant. With her nomination, McCain has shown two things: that he is very smart and that he is not yet defeated.”
Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group.
Tough apples!
They were hoping Obama would destroy this country and now Palin enters the scene.
Who Cares??
Who cares what the world thinks of Sarah. If we dislike some other foreign leader we get slammed as being arrogant ....
I’m tired of our media and Liberals whining about what the world thinks of us .... they can go pound sand ...then they cry for our assistance when they get into trouble ....
Drop dead. Better yet, pray to Mecca, then drop dead.
When Barak Obama speaks of retoring America's prestige, the people he and his buddies are concerned about are the Europeans described in this article.
Speaking for myself, I am quite content to have the European secularists think poorly of us.
The main publications in the UK seem to be embracing Palin though. Comparing her to Thatcher and Reagan.
I’m not so sure the European media speaks for the Europeans any more than the American media speaks for us. I’m sure that *most* of what Europe “thinks” is based on what their media says.
So...what?
LOL! What a bunch of neurotic snobs!
I can’t wait to send my cousin in Germany ( whom I haven’t talked to in 4 years since when I last visited her there she went on a hysterical rant about Bush Lied and the Us is the Roman Empire collapsing ) a telegram ( yes, telegram!) announcing McCain’s victory.
You can not BELIEVE the smugness of the Euroweenies till you have visited EuroPlayLand for 5 minutes..it takes just 5 minutes! ha/.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
I’m tired of this the world hates America/Bush/Palin whomever garbage. It’s certain lefty, communists in the world that will hate her—the same kind that hate her over here. There is no one world opinion and all this the world hates America crap is generated by the left leaning media trying to convince us that we are bad and bad for having Republicans in office. Some of the world hates us and some like us. Look at how well Bushie was received in Africa. Now granted he had to spend a lot of taxpayer money for that reception, but at least some of them showed gratitude.
Obama you are one sick little man, maybe instead of asking Chuck to stand up, Biden should ask you to sit down...
|
Europe. The continent that is unable to defend itself, after 63 years of being liberated from the Nazis and the Fascists. I’ve had it with these countries that cry and wail whenever somebody picks on them. The Muslims are overrunning all of Western Europe, and they refuse to defend themselves, expecting the US to fight terrorism on their behalf.
All of the German, Italian, and Spanish US bases ought to be closed, and the troops moved to Libya and Poland. Or, simply bring them home to defend our own borders.
And now they have the audacity to tell us who to vote for? Right.
As I said on a previous thread:
It is highly ironic that the Euroweenies bleat that Americans “arrogantly” appropriate the position of Leader of the Free World, all the while every Euroweenie and their media invest huge amounts of personal interest in American politics because, in fact, the U.S. is the Leader of the Free World.
The only thing the Europeans need to say to Sarah Palin is “Vice President”.
“What follows is a brief survey of what some of Europe’s leading newspapers are saying about Sarah Palin. “
Why should we think that the newspapers in Europe give the true view of Europeans any more than the American newspapers do ours reflect ?
Hey! Gas here in FL was not available in a lot of gas stations due to the hysteria of the storm Ike...GUESS WHO HAD GAS????
Yup, my favorite store: Wally mart.!
I don’t give a rat’s rear end what other countries think of us. That is for the libs and MSM to fuss about.
You only care about what others think when you are a follower. A good leader tells you what they think (without taking a poll).
I've seen a couple of favorable pieces about her--I think it was from the Sun in England.
Actually, the majority of the articles in three London papers — The Times, The Sun, and the Daily Mail — have been supportive and complimentary of McCain/Palin.
So, it’s not all bad.
Most Europeans want Americans to share their misery of living under Socialism, Communism and coming soon, Islam.
These are the same women who later grew their sons and daughters, again, to be strong and true to fight the fight against Islamic Terrorism, the battle they again refuse to fight and carp at and criticize daily, yet steadfastly, these women still perservere.
Sarah Palin is one of these women. And, I have no doubt, when Europe is in shambles from years of neglect to Islamic infiltration and culture encroachment, that this Lady will still do the right thing and help them. So, until they have US Citizen voter registration cards, their words will be as empty as they have been for the last 100 years.
As far as I can tell, there are two parts of Europe.
The part whose ass we kicked.
And the part whose ass we saved.
They can shut up now.
It’s more like Euro-Islamistan ... they’re bending over for Islamic terrorists .... “Oh pleeze pleeze don’t hurt us” ... they’re mad at America because we stand up to them ....
RE: Your cousin in Germany ... wishful thinking. And they call us mind numbed robots ....
You can also substitute the American media for European.
I care, that’s who cares. However, I do have to put it into perspective and qualify that by adding that I am more concerned what the penguins in Antartica think.
So, penguins in Antartica first, European blowhards second.
Works for me!!
Who gives a flying $hitt what them dips over their say go worship your ugly Queens and stfu.
You are why we do not want Obama, we are FREE to choose who we want.
Yeah! :)
I'm not ready to have our president selected by people who are not allowed to possess sharp sticks or to defend themselves.
Listening to the lamentations of euro-weenies is a guilty pleasure.
The Europeans can kiss my ...................!
I really wish we’d stop calling these people “elite.” There’s nothing elite about a collective group of people who practice a lifestyle that is proving incapable of doing something so basic as producing a next generation.
And mock the religious as they will, people do not come to Europe to see the work of modern secularists, but instead flock to her past—to her angelic churches, to the past artists who worked for patrons of faith.
The hostility you see to religion there is but the indecency of a once decent society and the result of a hostile take-over that has only been possible through an unchecked state. God thank the forefathers for the First Amendment—both in application and in mindset!
A lot of this pains me as someone of European descent, but as I’ve learned, Europeans have been taught to be ashamed of their past and thir own cultures, yet to embrace all that is foreign. You see that same effort being made in our nation with the multi-culturalists selling their nonsense in our schools.
Ah well, to keep up the good fight...
Well, yes. The world itself is just such a manifestation. These secular "cultural Christians" continue to amaze me with their ignorance, of their own religion no less.
You better believe it did. However it was from the self proclaimed "tolerant" left. They are tolerant of everyone, anywhere on the political spectrum from Marx to Stalin.
“a figure who comes from the America that is farthest removed from, and incomprehensible to, the European spectator…[who] represents values and policy proposals…the outlawing of abortion, the preponderance of religious faith, the supremacy of the traditional family, the subjection of the State to individual initiative...”
I seem to remember some famous words about the subjection of the State to the individual: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Yep, we kicked the Euros back to Europe (sorry Brits, you are as European as France) over that idea.
we should realize that these people are not our friends, but our enemies and treat them as such.
And just think, as members of NATO, we are committed to bail out their sorry a$$es. I say A.M.F. to them all.
“Many Europeans lament that Palin is (according to Europeans) pushing the US presidential election into a battle of values rather than of policies, as if there is any real substance to Obama. “
That’s exactly as it should be - policies are an outgrowth of values. Values is where the battle should be fought and I’m glad it’s happening. Unfortunately Obama is camouflaging his.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.