Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain Adopts Islamic Law, Gives Sharia Courts Full Power to Rule on Civil Cases
Fox News ^ | 15 Sept 2008 | Staff

Posted on 09/15/2008 9:59:02 AM PDT by PeterFinn

*Excerpt*

Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through county courts or the country's High Court, a part of its Supreme Court system.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.

Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 4societalsuicide; britain; culturalsuicide; dhimmi; eurabia; islam; mohammedanism; sharia; suicide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last
Say goodnight to Britain. What the Nazis could not steal the Brits themselves are giving away.
1 posted on 09/15/2008 9:59:02 AM PDT by PeterFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

WTF!?!


2 posted on 09/15/2008 9:59:52 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

There’s No England Anymore.


3 posted on 09/15/2008 10:01:48 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

This is beyond insanity. Can this be real? Oh God, don’t let the socialist activists on the SCOTUS hear about this....


4 posted on 09/15/2008 10:01:48 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

WHAT????????

British Government, what ARE you SMOKING???? Are you INSANE????


5 posted on 09/15/2008 10:01:52 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

It was nice knowing you, England.


6 posted on 09/15/2008 10:02:05 AM PDT by manic4organic (Send a care package through USO today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Britain is now officially dead... we should welcome all of the CONSERVATIVE British that wish to become Americans and trade our dims one-for-one with them for those Conservatives.

LLS

7 posted on 09/15/2008 10:02:10 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except for dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

"England is dead, Jim.
Dead, moribund, deceased, passed on, over,
and now in its final dirtnap"


8 posted on 09/15/2008 10:02:26 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Next: Canada.


9 posted on 09/15/2008 10:02:55 AM PDT by polymuser (Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

This is so tragic.


10 posted on 09/15/2008 10:02:56 AM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

And so it has begun...


11 posted on 09/15/2008 10:03:00 AM PDT by itsthejourney (Sarah-cuda IS the right reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Will the last sane person leaving Britain please turn out the lights...No need for them in a Medieval society.
12 posted on 09/15/2008 10:04:36 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Oh good. I fully expect Courts of Canon Law to be extended the same courtesy.

/Sarc, sarc, a thousand times sarc!

13 posted on 09/15/2008 10:05:07 AM PDT by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

What the hell is wrong with those people!!??


14 posted on 09/15/2008 10:05:28 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Jewish courts have existed on the same basis for over 100 years...


15 posted on 09/15/2008 10:05:35 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thefrankbaum

See above...


16 posted on 09/15/2008 10:05:58 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

CANNOT POST THIS ENOUGH!

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

Nation % Muslim
United States 1.0%
Australia 1.5%
Italy 1.5%
Norway 1.8%
Canada 1.9%
China 2.0%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Nation % Muslim
Denmark 2.0%
United Kingdom 2.7%
Germany 3.7%
Spain 4.0%
Thailand 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).

Nation % Muslim
Switzerland 4.3%
Philippines 5.0%
Sweden 5.0%
The Netherlands 5.5%
Trinida and Tabago 5.8%
France 8.0%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world. When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam - Mohammed cartoons).

Nation % Muslim
Guyana 10.0%
India 13.4%
Israel 16.0%
Kenya 10.0%
Russia 15.0%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Nation % Muslim
Ethiopia 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Nation % Muslim
Bosnia 40.0%
Chad 50.1%
Lebanon 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Nation % Muslim
Albania 70.0%
Malaysia 60.4%
Qatar 77.5%
Sudan 70.0%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Nation % Muslim
Bangladesh 83.0%
Egypt 90.0%
Gaza 98.7%
Indonesia 86.1%
Iran 98.0%
Iraq 97.0%
Jordan 92.0%
Morocco 98.7%
Pakistan 97.0%
Syria 90.0%
Tajikistan 90.0%
Turkey 99.8%
United Arab Emirates 96.0%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim: Nation % Muslim
Yemen 99.9%
Afghanistan 100.0%
Saudi Arabia 100.0%
Somalia 100.0%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

– Leon Uris, “The Haj” Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat


17 posted on 09/15/2008 10:06:44 AM PDT by mouse1 (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

The Jews aren’t trying to impose Judaism and Rabbincal law on everyone else by force. BIG difference.


18 posted on 09/15/2008 10:07:44 AM PDT by PeterFinn ("I will stand with the Muslims" - Barack Hussein Obama p. 261 "Audacity of Hope")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

The end. It’s over, Britain.


19 posted on 09/15/2008 10:07:59 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Congrasites = Congressional parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Please tell me this is a parody. I never thought this could be possible.


20 posted on 09/15/2008 10:08:15 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

“What the hell is wrong with those people!!??”

I don’t know, but this is frightening! Now that the UK has adopted this, other European countries may follow. This could also spread to North America, with Canada likely being the first to do this.

We can’t let Obama & the socialist Democrats have power. I wouldn’t put it past them to implement something like this!

It bewilders me that, in the UK, there are Muslim clerics preaching, “Death to the UK! Death to America!” and the British government does absolutely NOTHING about it!

They are letting the Muslims overrun their country and they will eventually become an Islamic state. God have mercy on them!


21 posted on 09/15/2008 10:09:31 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Hope they aren’t looking for us to save them this time...


22 posted on 09/15/2008 10:09:51 AM PDT by NRA1995 (It should be called "Cosa Nostra", not "Congress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

I doubt they're talking about official courts, but rather private arbitration organizations.

We have those in the US, too- if you want to have a Sharia court serve as the arbitrator for a divorce or financial dispute, you can do so here. Of course, any decision by that court could not violate American law or public policy.

The issue of these courts dealing with domestic violence, if true, is surprising. Here, we're dealing with criminal law, which is something private arbitrators cannot rule on in this country.

23 posted on 09/15/2008 10:11:13 AM PDT by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

And they think we should vote for Obama...Sad Sad and more Sad... I think we all saw it coming.


24 posted on 09/15/2008 10:12:14 AM PDT by just me (Looks like the MSM moonbats have been infected with rabies..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Incredible. Cousins, you’ve become a parody.


25 posted on 09/15/2008 10:12:29 AM PDT by tumblindice (I'm sticking by my guns and voting for conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Jewish courts have existed on the same basis for over 100 years...

Arbitration by private parties is nothing new. But if this article is correct, then the Sharia courts are being allowed to rule on issues of criminal law if they can rule in domestic violence cases.

26 posted on 09/15/2008 10:13:00 AM PDT by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

“powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence”

You know, oddly enough, the left has been protecting sharia law for sssoooo long — what they don’t realize is that were sharia law arrive her on the shores of the US...feminism, homosexuality, sloth, disobedience, adultery, and failure to pay your debts...are all punishable offenses...with very strong emphasis on “punishable.”

Has the left really given this all that much thought — because at least four out of the five I listed are actual constituencies of the left...


27 posted on 09/15/2008 10:13:29 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

And Sharia law hasn’t been imposed on anyone else. It only muslims who agree to accept the right of the sharia court to decide the outcome of certain civil matters, the same as it has been for religious jews in this country for over a century.
There was an inconsistency in the law up until this point. Either the Jewish civil law courts and the Ecclesiastical CoE courts had to go, or Sharia civil courts had to come in...


28 posted on 09/15/2008 10:13:29 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Do you realize that this means that a Muslim could “believe” that a Brit blasphemed the Koran and justifiably kill him, while a Brit who actually saw a Muslim desecrate a copy of the Bible could (a) criticize him = hate crime = imprisonment, or (b) kill him = murder.

Jaw dropping. It’s all over, Britain.


29 posted on 09/15/2008 10:14:33 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Congrasites = Congressional parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Ah well, the Brits never did like our infantile preoccupation with BOSOMS!


30 posted on 09/15/2008 10:14:36 AM PDT by NRA1995 (It should be called "Cosa Nostra", not "Congress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

I just read this article and came here to see if it had been posted.

Europe is falling fast.


31 posted on 09/15/2008 10:15:02 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

Saudi Arabia isn’t 100% muslim once you include their Filipino slaves and indentured servants.


32 posted on 09/15/2008 10:15:30 AM PDT by PeterFinn ("I will stand with the Muslims" - Barack Hussein Obama p. 261 "Audacity of Hope")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

What’s not being explained here, is that judges in England are terrified to rule on any Islamic defendant/party/case which may show up on their docket. Judges and their families are threatened and targeted by hoards of the animals. So given the option, they welcome no longer getting such cases brought before the courts.


33 posted on 09/15/2008 10:15:43 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.

How does a gay guy get stoned in the UK?

.

By hitting on Achmed.

.

34 posted on 09/15/2008 10:16:41 AM PDT by polymuser (Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

When you’re ready for divorce, say the magic phrase 3 times, convert, and then divorce your wife under Sharia, saying the magic divorce phrase 3 times. She gets nothing. Not bad...

Yeah, this is going to work out well.


35 posted on 09/15/2008 10:16:46 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Do you realize that this means that a Muslim could “believe” that a Brit blasphemed the Koran and justifiably kill him,

There's no indication that Muslims charged with crimes will be tried under Sharia law.

36 posted on 09/15/2008 10:17:45 AM PDT by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: econjack
I forget the exact figures (give or take 400,000 per year) are leaving in droves and being replaced with mainly Muslim immigrants.
37 posted on 09/15/2008 10:17:59 AM PDT by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE and Help Beat Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Of course, some will say “So what? People have the right to use whatever arbitration they want.” What they fail to see is that this is based on religion, pressure to use such courts, and the proper civil courts must uphold any decisions made by these cultists.


38 posted on 09/15/2008 10:18:10 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

The women withdrew criminal charges against the husbands. The Sharia courts cannot impose criminal penalties or decide on criminal matters. It is seperate from the civil action taken against someone for a criminal offence, like when somebody is sued for assault seperately to the criminal charge the defendent faces in the criminal courts...


39 posted on 09/15/2008 10:21:16 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
And Sharia law hasn’t been imposed on anyone else.

Bullsh*t it hasn't. It's been imposed on Christians in Kosovo, Bosnia, Darfur, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and it's been imposed in the USA itself at every firm such as > Intel < where pork products were briefly banned in their cafeterias in 2006 for 'offending' muslims and sharia is imposed on every person who cannot speak freely in their workplace or in public about the atrocities of islam for fear of 'offending' people whose faith itself is a vile abomination and an insult to free peoples everywhere.

40 posted on 09/15/2008 10:22:25 AM PDT by PeterFinn ("I will stand with the Muslims" - Barack Hussein Obama p. 261 "Audacity of Hope")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NRA1995

We just watched that movie on Friday. Great movie, I love the old cars.


41 posted on 09/15/2008 10:22:39 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.

Those are some smart politicians and church leaders. Let's celebrate every legal system. Let every man be a law unto himself. This should be some celebration.

42 posted on 09/15/2008 10:22:48 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I’ve no doubt that’s a good explanation of how sharia courts have come to fruition in England. But, whatever the reason, the story is just as nightmarish.


43 posted on 09/15/2008 10:25:26 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: econjack
No need for them in a Medieval society.

The medieval world represented the highpoint of Western civilization and culture. (Scholasticism) It's the exact antithesis of Islamic fideism.

Don't believe the crap you learned in high school.

44 posted on 09/15/2008 10:28:37 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I will never recognize or submit to Sharia in any form, nor will I recognize as legitimate any government that does so here in the USA.

Just so you know in advance.


45 posted on 09/15/2008 10:37:44 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
The medieval world represented the highpoint of Western civilization and culture.

Kinda depends on what you're using for a yardstick. My measuring tools are different from yours.

46 posted on 09/15/2008 10:37:53 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mancini

“This is so tragic.”

Yes it is.

Churchill’s speech comes to mind...

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every
woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.


47 posted on 09/15/2008 10:45:50 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
The women withdrew criminal charges against the husbands. The Sharia courts cannot impose criminal penalties or decide on criminal matters. It is seperate from the civil action taken against someone for a criminal offence, like when somebody is sued for assault seperately to the criminal charge the defendent faces in the criminal courts...

I guess it falls into a quasi-civil, quasi-criminal area in British law, then. Kind of unusual by our standards.

I have no problem with private parties resolving civil disputes through whatever arbitration method they desire. We already do that in the US and it works fine here.

48 posted on 09/15/2008 10:48:40 AM PDT by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

I guess that means beheadings, public stoning of women to death, hand chopping are now going to be Friday night family nights for the Muzzies in the UK, plus any non- Muzzie that agrees to face a sharia law court if he committed a crime against a Muzzie.

The UK is finnished. The Muzzies were right, The Islamic flag will replace the Union Jack within 10 years.


49 posted on 09/15/2008 10:50:06 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Boy, talk about pulling the handle on the way down! Unbelievable.


50 posted on 09/15/2008 10:50:13 AM PDT by ataDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson