Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Interview with Sean Hannity Pt.1
Palin Planet ^

Posted on 09/18/2008 12:09:56 AM PDT by WaveMan

Here's a video clip of the first part of Sean Hannity's interview with Sarah Palin.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: foxnews; hannity; interview; mccainpalin; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Shery; Glenn
I cannot get it either, and it is not blocked by my computer. I tried several times.

Try switching to the Safari browser, you may still be unable to see the video, but at least you'll have a cool excuse like Glenn does, LMAO!
21 posted on 09/18/2008 3:40:32 AM PDT by mkjessup (I'm not a Community Organizer, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WaveMan

Awesome job! Every time I see her speak in various formats, I am more impressed! She held her own with grace and style against that arrogant, condescending dipwad (who, by the way, should NEVER get another interview with VP Palin), and simply shone in this interview. I like how she consulted “the girls” (her daughters) about the VP nod, and asked them to vote whether or not she should take it. This comforts me, knowing that Bristol was not an unfortunate victim of her mother’s ambition as old media has OF COURSE painted it. Palin is the real thing, an American who has the right temperament, resolve, and smarts to be VP and President.


22 posted on 09/18/2008 3:58:38 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (I think, therefore, I vote Republican. McCain-Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole

LOL! And ‘Linseed’ Graham hands him a pink, lace hankie...


23 posted on 09/18/2008 4:16:54 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
If she is going to Washington to “ruffle some feathers” and “shake things up” and she wants to be bipartisan and reach across the aisle like her pal McCain, it seems like she will only be able to ruffle up Republican feathers. I noticed Sean grimaced at some of these “bipartisan” comments also.
She also was quick to explain the financial problem as CEO greed rather than the desire of the Dems and weak Republicans to get nice new homes into the hands of the “disadvantaged”.
24 posted on 09/18/2008 4:20:21 AM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WaveMan

Ping to self


25 posted on 09/18/2008 4:28:03 AM PDT by PjhCPA (Palin is HOT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: razzle
She also was quick to explain the financial problem as CEO greed rather than the desire of the Dems and weak Republicans to get nice new homes into the hands of the “disadvantaged”.

In reality, both causes contributed. Those CEOs had fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders (and the public backers in the case of FANNIE and FREDDIE) and were more concerned with quarterly growth - that drove up their compensation - than properly assessing and mitigating excessive risks. I'd like to see a special prosecutor and a forensic accountant look at Franklin Raines performance during his tenure. I cannot believe he and his fellow CEOs in the failed institutions exercised due diligence. While we're at it, I'd like to see an evaluation of the board of directors at these institutions.

That said, there is no denying the complicity of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and who knows how many other legislators in this. I think the public deserves a special prosecutor now...

26 posted on 09/18/2008 4:38:30 AM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TheMole

that’s some really nice art! Such depth of emotion - so much told in one captured moment. I must forward it to my friends today.


27 posted on 09/18/2008 4:39:30 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RochesterFan

I should have noted that I realize that Franklin Raines is an ex-CEO of FANNIE - but he pulled out $90M over 6 years up to 2005. We need to look at him as well as the one at the helm when the bubble burst...


28 posted on 09/18/2008 4:42:46 AM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: razzle

It is not her job in this interview to point out that the Wall Street greed was caused primarily by Dems; that’s OUR job. And it is McCain’s job (and ours) to point out that he and President Bush tried to stop the catastrophe, but that the greedy, traitorous Dems stopped the reform efforts. Why his campaign isn’t highlighting this is beyond me; it would be a GREAT poke against both Obama and the miserable approval ratings of Congress and how since 2006, it’s been “business as usual”, or re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic (LOL).

Our new mantra should be: McCain, right on the surge, right on the need for reform in Washington and Wall Street, and right for the American people. (And we are all in a position to add that this whole mess is due to the stealing by the Dems.)

A new ad (idea blithely stolen from National Review!) for McCain should show his 2005 comments scrolling across his and Palin’s faces, then showing Raines’ and Franks’ comments scrolling across Obama’s face, with the tag: We can’t afford the mistakes Obama’s advisors have made, and we can’t afford Obama.


29 posted on 09/18/2008 4:49:23 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (I think, therefore, I vote Republican. McCain-Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I can relate to that. I left an AOG way back in 1999 and believe it or not it cost me my marriage. Talk about way out there, these guys were like Kenneth Copeland on steriods.


30 posted on 09/18/2008 5:07:39 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IreneE

Your point about President Bush and “everyone not wanting to drill in Alaska” is unclear to me.

It SEEMED to say that Bush is part of a large group (”everyone”?) not wanting to drill in Alaska, because of a deal Henry Kissinger made with the Saudis.

???

First, Bush wants to drill not only in Alaska - newsflash to you...there’s already drilling in Alaska...but he also wants drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (known as ANWR). He and most - not all - Republicans have been trying for years to allow drilling in ANWR only to have the Democrats in Congress block them at every turn.

Bill Clinton even had a measure on his desk to drill there, and he vetoed it.

Since then, one cannot get through the House or Senate to even get on President Bush’s desk.

I don’t know anything about the Kissinger deal with SA, but even if true, Bush would not do or fail to do something on the basis of Henry Kissinger.


31 posted on 09/18/2008 5:18:49 AM PDT by txrangerette (Just say "no" to the Obama Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RochesterFan
Those CEOs knew all along that the Dems would bail out their “risky schemes”, after all their hearts were in the “right place”.
32 posted on 09/18/2008 6:52:07 AM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I’ve tried it in IE. Firefox and Chrome - works great in all of them...

Only a granola-eatin’ lib would run something like MacOS or Safari...:P


33 posted on 09/18/2008 10:07:57 AM PDT by WaveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson