Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi's 'Drilling' Charade: SHAM, BABY, SHAM Pelosi's alternative-energy choice? snake oil
The Oregonian ^ | September 17, 2008 | David Reinhard

Posted on 09/18/2008 11:22:49 AM PDT by jazusamo

How lame is the energy bill that Speaker Nancy Pelosi had her House Democrats pass through the House on Tuesday? Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu said before the vote that Pelosi's handiwork would be "dead on arrival" in the Senate. This from a Democrat who's up for re-election in an oil-and-gas state that would seem to gain from the bill's much-ballyhooed expansion of offshore drilling?

What gives? For starters, Landrieu knows that the limited drilling the House leadership allows in principle -- it opens up waters 50 miles from shore with state approval -- is made next to impossible in practice. How? By not allowing states to share in the revenues. Why would they agree to oil rigs off their shores when there's nothing in it for them?

Why would Pelosi and company pass a bill that really doesn't increase domestic oil production? Don't they realize Americans favor greater reliance on our own resources and want long-term relief from high gasoline and natural gas prices? Yes. Which is why they put together an energy bill with a drilling component and scheduled a vote. They were getting hammered for not even allowing a vote on the House GOP's energy bill. It's also why the House Democrats' "drilling" provision is, as Landrieu understands, a sham. The Pelosi bill does not constitute an energy strategy to bring down prices over the long term. It's a political strategy to give the illusion of action.

"Democrats appear to be aiming to bring their bill up for a vote in order to say they've held a vote on drilling ...," Congressional Quarterly reported.

Mere speculation? A conclusion based on the chasm between what the Pelosi package promises and what it delivers? Hardly. A House Democratic leadership aide told the quarterly that "members are concerned that they are getting beat up on the issue ... and want to be 'armed to hit back.'"

The bill's sham drilling provisions are clear when set against the House Republicans' drilling provisions. Unlike the Pelosi bill, the GOP's comprehensive energy alternative -- comprehensive in that 40 percent of royalties from the new oil leases (an estimated $1.2 trillion) would go to renewable research and development, environmental cleanup, carbon sequestration and nuclear waste recycling -- allows development of the 2.5 million barrels of oil per day in domestic shale oil resources. The Pelosi bill requires that states "opt-in" and does not allow communities to share in the revenues. Again, there's no incentive for states to allow shale-oil development.

Unlike the Pelosi bill, the GOP alternative provides a real lifting -- not a faux lifting -- of the current ban on offshore drilling. It not only includes financial revenue-sharing incentives for states that approve coastal drilling, but also opens up a far larger area where drilling can take place. The Pelosi bill limits all oil and gas drilling to 50 miles. The GOP alternative allows states to decide if they want drilling from 25 to 50 miles offshore -- where most of the oil and gas is located. On the Pacific Coast this cuts off more than 97 percent of our Pacific oil and natural gas reserves.

The Pelosi bill "allows" drilling from 50 to 100 miles out if states "opt in." Without revenue sharing for the states, however, this won't happen. The GOP alternative gives states that decide to allow offshore drilling 30 percent of the revenues.

In practice, the Pelosi bill fences off outer-continental shelf oil and gas production within 100 miles of our shoreline. Right now, Congress' annual ban puts 85 percent of the outer-continental shelf off-limits. This is an area with up to 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of gas. The Pelosi bill keeps 88 percent of this resource-rich area (the 85 percent of the outer-continental now under lock and key) off-limits for good. This is an energy policy?

It's not even clear it's a good political strategy. Pelosi's bill is an obvious charade. Recall Landrieu's dead-on-arrival warning. Then there's this: The offshore drilling ban must be renewed each year. Thus, if Congress does not pass another ban -- or something in its place -- by Oct. 1, the whole drilling ban is no more. They'll be no distinctions between 25, 50, 100 or 200 miles offshore or putting 40 percent of the royalties into conservation and renewable energy. Then, Pelosi will have conspired through a mix of intrigue and ineptness to produce an energy policy that will rightly be called "Drill, baby, drill."


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; democratcongress; democrats; domesticoil; donothingdemocrats; drillbabydrill; drillheredrillnow; drilling; energy; gasprices; ninepercentnancy; offshoredrilling; oil; pelosi; reinhard; sham; windmillnancy

1 posted on 09/18/2008 11:22:50 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

SHAM BABY SHAM

IMHO, I think she is either on drugs or mentally ill.
And to think under a bho administration, 9% Nancy would be two heart beats away from being president. Scarey!


2 posted on 09/18/2008 11:28:42 AM PDT by mouse1 (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The only drilling she wants to do in Alaska is to dig up dirt........


3 posted on 09/18/2008 11:29:13 AM PDT by Red Badger (I'm gonna use "Sarah!" FROM NOW ON SINCE Hillary uses "Hillary!".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pelosi wants gas prices as high as possible because California adds 7.5% tax on every dollar spent on gas.


4 posted on 09/18/2008 11:30:37 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nancy is a fraud who will NOT be in ANY leadership position, come February. Irrespective of the election results.
Her 2 years of failed “leadership” will be remembered in infamy.


5 posted on 09/18/2008 11:32:41 AM PDT by G Larry ("Disgust" is a valid expression!-Vote Family Values!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The Democrat's major accomplishment was to add Alaska's offshore sites to the banned list.

The Democrat "No Domestic Energy Policy!"

All of that puts the U.S. in a position that war for oil or
complete economic collapse will be our only choices.
You can't frustrate every source of domestic energy
without consequences. Our enemies will blackmail us
to the extent that we are vulnerable to blackmail.

The Democrats are leading us into a real war for oil.
A war we won't have the energy to fight.

6 posted on 09/18/2008 11:33:25 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She’s putting up this bill so that she can use it against republicans. “Democrats in congress voted for an expansion of drilling, Republicans voted to block it. Is this who you want running your country?”


7 posted on 09/18/2008 11:34:30 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Nancy is a fraud who will NOT be in ANY leadership position, come February

I agree, she has to be the worst Speaker in our lifetime and the Dems know it.

8 posted on 09/18/2008 11:37:09 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RC2

The high gas prices are hurting Virginia. They charge gas tax as so many cents per gallon. With consumption down, so are revenues.

What the Demoncrats are doing is responding to the people’s demand to drill here and now the only way they can. By making it look like we can drill, but in reality making it virtually impossible.

It’s all about public perception. I think she wants to make Lincoln a liar. You recall that Lincoln said, “You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”


9 posted on 09/18/2008 11:39:48 AM PDT by fredhead (Obama wants to kill babies and raise taxes. Palin wants to kill taxes and raise babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Earth to Pelosi!.....Smooth move ex-lax!....most of the oil is inside 50 miles.


10 posted on 09/18/2008 11:41:02 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The bill also requires we pump and use 10% of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Pelosi doesn’t even know the reserve is for the MILITARY and situations if foreign oil is not available.


11 posted on 09/18/2008 11:41:53 AM PDT by alpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpo

Yes, the RATS are fixated on tapping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, that’s so lame it’s difficult to put in words.


12 posted on 09/18/2008 11:45:48 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

Pelosi should be fired from her job.


13 posted on 09/18/2008 11:49:16 AM PDT by Pilated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Can’t we drill her brains?
Looks like we have..


14 posted on 09/18/2008 11:49:18 AM PDT by aeonspromise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Drill Nancy's head.

Granted it aint oil, but maybe we could set up a methane processor like Bartertown.

15 posted on 09/18/2008 11:53:23 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I will stand with the Muslims ~B Hussein Obomunist ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Verito Possumus~Verified Sleeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

we don’t really know the long-term effect of botox, do we?

it would explain for some of the insane behaviour and comments from more than a few dems including
Nanny Pelosi, John $kerry and bArney and rangel


16 posted on 09/18/2008 11:55:22 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE's toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pilated

If we can vote out enough House Dems, this can happen. If we don’t, forget about it.


17 posted on 09/18/2008 12:00:35 PM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Republicans should just keep repeating that Pelosi’s bill is a ‘JOKE AND A FRAUD’ The RNC has plenty of money for ads saying this over and over.


18 posted on 09/18/2008 12:34:53 PM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Democrats appear to be aiming to bring their bill up for a vote in order to say they've held a vote on drilling ..."

And, this is today's Democratic Party. Specious claims of drilling support, while undermining U.S. energy production.

Why would the Dems undermine U.S. energy production?

As nearly as I can figure it, they want to mess up our economy so horribly, that they will literally torture voters into opting for "change".

.

19 posted on 09/18/2008 1:52:35 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The one year “renew” provision is an even bigger sham.
Who will spend any moeny even doing “exploration” if they have one year renewals?

This isn’t registration for your car, for cripes sakes.
Even my small country gives 3 year renewals on dog licenses!!!!!!


20 posted on 09/18/2008 1:55:06 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
bumper-sticker
 
 

Contact your Congress critters to let them that you know the best oil is located in the first 50-mile range, shoreline to 50-mile point.

U. S. Senate

U. S. House of Representatives

Send Nancy’s email to:

http://www.speaker.gov/contact/

And un-elect all the dimocrats who will not support drilling EVERYWHERE!

21 posted on 09/18/2008 5:05:00 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Contact your Congress critters to let them that you know the best oil is located in the first 50-mile range, shoreline to 50-mile point.

BUMP! and thanks.

22 posted on 09/18/2008 5:12:17 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson