Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David W. Moore Breaks Down Polling Data
Boston.com ^ | 9/17/08 | 1sStrike

Posted on 09/18/2008 1:32:09 PM PDT by 1stStrike

Are pre-election polls accurate? Wed, 17 Sep 2008 (NECN) - Mike Nikitas sits down with David W. Moore, author of The Opinion Makers: An insider exposes the truth behind the polls. Moore is a former vice president at the Gallup Polling Organization and the founder of the University of New Hamps...

(Excerpt) Read more at multimedia.boston.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; electionpresident; mccainpalin; pollingdata
I thought this was a very good interview that explained some of the faulty science behind most poll numbers. The author talks about how pollsters had Obama up by 10-11 in N.H., only to still lose to Clinton. Something I almost forgot about.
1 posted on 09/18/2008 1:32:13 PM PDT by 1stStrike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1stStrike

Great interview. Shold be required watching for FReepers who live and die by the polls.

As many as 25-30% could still be undecided or influenced one way of the other. The polling companies force people into a decision.

Election day is all that matters. Voting is a gut check. Which is why I can’t imagine that Obama will win.


2 posted on 09/18/2008 1:42:43 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

I can’t imagine Obama winning either. I would certainly like to hear from someone in the polling industry as to what percentage they consider the “Bradley effect” to be. Is it 3%? Is is 10%. In a tight race like this, it could turn things into a landslide.


3 posted on 09/18/2008 2:01:57 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (I would spend more time on FR but I have to make sure my tires are inflated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1stStrike

Didn’t Obama fail to carry most of the later primaries in larger states?


4 posted on 09/18/2008 2:02:48 PM PDT by 6SJ7 (Welcome PUMAs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stStrike

There was a guy on Glenn Beck last night who claimed that minority candidates need double digit leads in polls because people don’t want to come off as racist when asked if they support the minority candidate. Once they are in the voting booth, they don’t vote for the minority candidate. Apparently this is well known amongst pollsters and is the reason why they are upset that McCain is now leading or has closed the gap to single digits in many states.


5 posted on 09/18/2008 3:04:35 PM PDT by Gen-X-Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stStrike

Important to remember that Obama won because of caucuses. Had all the primaries been regular voting he would have lost to Hillary. Caucuses depend a great deal on organization and less on popularity.


6 posted on 09/18/2008 4:06:39 PM PDT by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen-X-Dad

If this is true, McCain/Palin is headed for a landslide. Look for 400 EVs.


7 posted on 09/19/2008 7:28:44 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (I would spend more time on FR but I have to make sure my tires are inflated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson