how about this claim “ Over the past 50 years, the eight cities listed above have had Republican leadership for a combined 36 years. The rest of the time — a combined 364 years — they’ve been led by Democrats. “
the ratio is about 10%, time the crime cities are run by Republicans as the claim states. Does it make much difference if the real umber is 15% or 12%? Typical lib arguments will say if there is one flaw then all the data is bad,,, but as an approximation, the claims have the order of magnitude and correlation correct , yes, ?
I would like to see someone perfect it so that we can get it into the email world and into letters to the editor.
It would make a great little, neat, devastating package.