Posted on 09/19/2008 1:28:47 PM PDT by kristinn
Yes, the left mustn’t even allow ONE conservative point of view.
This is the biggest cultural clash in my lifetime, the left and it’s minions against freedom and survival.
It’s very depressing. The left is sneaking into every aspect of American life. They’re total intolerant fascists. They want to completely kill freedom and the country.
Office Space!
/b/tard ;-P
Just like the Arab countries that said 911 was staged by the Israelis. Do we see a pattern here?
I’ll plan on pretending to be an MSNBC “reporter”, to get in to visit them when they are in prison, “to tell their side of the story”, and then laugh in their zoo animal faces. >Bo)
Did anyone have any problems getting on FR this week? I had trouble three different nights at the same time frame (around 8p-8:45p CST hour)each night. No lie - it never would pull up. Later these same nights I could get on....finally. Could FR be targeted or could it just be me, the user? :)I have experienced high traffic and slow sign ons but this has been different. I had my husband try on his computer and he couldn’t either......
Not only that, but there are methods known as ‘smurf attacks’ that can be instigated by one person in one place, and use spoofed IP’s to generate DDoS attacks from servers all over the place:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smurf_attack
So, it could technically be one, or a few hackers doing this if they’ve found some ISP’s who still haven’t closed these holes.
There are ways to close those holes and most ISP’s in the US have. But that doesn’t stop an attacker from using servers in China, Korea, etc, where these holes are usually still wide open.
‘Smurfing’ is a pretty old method, I’ve been privy to them for about 10 years since I worked at a Mom & Pop ISP back in the boom days. All it would take was for one of our customers (usually a kid) to P/O somebody else (usually another kid) on IRC or another chat room somewhere, and the next thing you know, we’re getting ‘smurf’ed’. It would take us hours to recover and it became a big problem until we got our upstream provider to start putting measures in place to mitigate the attacks.
Go ahead and crack into his yahoo account...his password is Luffa
AP Refuses Secret Service Request for Palin’s “Hacked” Emails
editor and Publisher | Published: September 18, 2008 12:15 AM ET
Posted on 09/18/2008 5:36:00 AM PDT by Perdogg
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2084960/posts
Hacker impersonated Palin, stole e-mail password
AP via Breitbart | September 18, 2008 | Ted Bridis
Posted on 09/18/2008 1:30:33 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2085304/posts
Memphis Lawmaker’s (DEMOCRAT )Son Investigated for Palin Hacking
wrecradio.com | Thursday, September 18, 2008 | wrecradio.
Posted on 09/18/2008 4:12:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2085396/posts
State rep says son focus of Palin e-mail hacking rumors
Knoxnews.com | September 18, 2008 | Staff
Posted on 09/19/2008 5:46:27 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2085756/posts
Identity of Sarah Palin Hacker Revealed By His Own Dad (Dems for Obama)
exflux.media | sept 19,2001 | Eric Blair
Posted on 09/19/2008 8:27:41 AM PDT by AmericanMade1776
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2085890/posts
From May 15, 2003: To Register Doubts, Press Here
(Who is Mike Kernell, Hacker’s Dad?)
New York Times | Published: May 15, 2003 | By Sam Lubell
Posted on 09/19/2008 1:27:07 PM PDT by jessduntno
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086098/posts
It is too bad one cannot have certain web pages on one server using a separate software as well as a separate system network interface that also allows users to cross over to the other site once passing a set of certain tasks. That would help a lot at in essence keeping these DDoS or Dos attack away from the bulk of the site and won't tax the rest of the system that serves up pages etc. It would be sort of like a 'front porch' for the site. If they can't get through the door they can only destroy the front porch, but nothing inside.
I assume going forward we will be seeing a lot more of these sort of attacks. I am surprised there is not more offered to accommodate this new reality. I guess they figure if a page can tie into the larger site then so can a hacker so why work so hard and spend so much money on maintaining basically two systems, but at least it will make the attackers work harder to pull off an effective attack.
Just saw your post a few minutes ago and turned O’Reilly on. He’s on loud and clear!
.
Yup
Geraldo on with O’ now
-
It’s not the FBI and SS these creeps need to fear
It’s Bill Gates and others who are working together to prosecute them and sue them too
Don’t go against BIG MONEY and expect to survive
I hope they are prosecuted but with all the liberal judges we have you never know how severe it will be. Good to know Gates is going after them.
.
Like drug dealers use young kids as runners
It may be that Daddy used his “emotionally unstable” 20 year old son to do the deed
Kinda like Al Qaeda using women and kids as bombers
[It may be that Daddy used his “emotionally unstable” 20 year old son to do the deed]
I imagine we have all thought of that and what kind of father would expose his son to the consequences of hacking..whoops, probably an irate liberal democrat. They get away with most things they do.
.
Dems get away with it
Illegally intercepting and recording cellphones of Republicans
But for the NSA to monitor an Islamic terrorist calling in from a cave........
No privacy!
It is too bad one cannot have certain web pages on one server using a separate software as well as a separate system network interface that also allows users to cross over to the other site once passing a set of certain tasks.
That's done all the time. Think bank, insurance company, or many places where you buy stuff online.
You authenticate yourself in some manner- user id/password and a secure connection is made to a different webserver.
This also helps to shield the confidential information from that which is publicly available.
But if they hammer the "front door" then nobody can get in.
That would help a lot at in essence keeping these DDoS or Dos attack away from the bulk of the site and won't tax the rest of the system that serves up pages etc. It would be sort of like a 'front porch' for the site. If they can't get through the door they can only destroy the front porch, but nothing inside.
I assume going forward we will be seeing a lot more of these sort of attacks. I am surprised there is not more offered to accommodate this new reality. I guess they figure if a page can tie into the larger site then so can a hacker so why work so hard and spend so much money on maintaining basically two systems, but at least it will make the attackers work harder to pull off an effective attack.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.