Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1976 Gallup tracking poll: Ford vs. Carter(very interesting reading!!)
gallup ^

Posted on 09/20/2008 11:35:28 AM PDT by maccaca

General Election Campaign In presidential trial-heat matchups between Ford and Carter, Ford trailed the eventual Democratic nominee by small margins in March, April, and early May. By late May, Carter opened up a double-digit lead and maintained it until late September. Carter's lead swelled to as much as 33 points, 62% to 29% among registered voters, after the Democratic convention that year. Ford cut into the margin after the Republican convention, reducing a 25-point (57% to 32%) early August deficit to 13 points (50% to 37%). ... In a poll conducted immediately after their first debate, Carter maintained a double-digit lead. But Ford chipped away at that lead and before the second debate a poll showed the two in a statistical dead heat (Carter 47%, Ford 45%). However, in the next debate Ford incorrectly asserted that Eastern Europe was not under Soviet domination, and Carter pulled ahead, 48% to 42%. Carter continued to lead the race for the next few weeks, but Ford made up additional ground following the third debate in late October, again pulling even. In the final pre-election poll, Gallup's numbers indicated a statistical dead heat among likely voters, with Ford at 49% and Carter 48% (the unallocated numbers had Ford at 47% and Carter at 46%). The actual outcome was 50% for Carter and 48% for Ford. The election was so close that it was not certain that Carter would win until the morning after Election Day.

(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1976; carter; electionpresident; fordcarter; geraldford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: rhinohunter

That is what I was trying to say in another thread.

God is in control. He has a way of blessing us with the right leader at the right time. We will get the President we need.


21 posted on 09/20/2008 12:06:00 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maccaca
In addition to the Nixon fiasco, the electorate was considerably different than it is today. When Carter was elected a sizable portion of the electorate either remembered the New Deal or could relate to it through their parents. The crazies on the far left were the hippies. Today the memories are of the hippies and the crazies are pure anti-democracy Marxists. IMHO this is a far more dangerous election.
22 posted on 09/20/2008 12:21:44 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
The final 1980 polls said “too close to call”. Pollsters say it was a massive last minute shift. What do you expect them to say? “We blew it, and our polls were wrong!” No it is, “everyone decided at the last minute!”
Part of the reason 1980 was such a blowout was that Carter conceded the election early in the night while most of the country was still voting. Many of his supporters in the west just went home when they heard that.

Of course it didn't help that all the national newscasts prominently displayed the number of days that the hostages had been held in Iran every night. People were pretty disgusted.

Reagan's was accused of Logan Act violations as well. Many people suspected he secretly negotiated a deal with the Iranians on the release of the hostages. It didn't help that the hostages were finally released on his inauguration day in 1981.

All of this stuff should be taken into account when looking at old polls. World and campaign events do make a difference. Maybe Obama will have an "eastern Europe" moment.

23 posted on 09/20/2008 12:26:45 PM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maccaca

I remember as a punk kid staring incredulously at Ford when he made that inexplicable gaffe about Eastern Europe not being under Soviet Domination. One utterance on Ford’s part cost us four horrific Carter years.


24 posted on 09/20/2008 12:26:46 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Nixon was leading JFK.

But if not for election fraud in Texas and Chicago, Nixon would have been elected ...

25 posted on 09/20/2008 12:28:30 PM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

The media was in the bag for Carter.

At least the right can now fight back on the internet.


26 posted on 09/20/2008 12:34:07 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

Never thought of it that way. Great point!


27 posted on 09/20/2008 12:55:12 PM PDT by GeeMoney (Hey Obama, it's God BLESS America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mainerforglobalwarming
The messiah’s base support I don't think is there to get kerry’s 48%.

Exactly. The die is cast.

Obama cannot possibly get close to bringing in all of Kerry's voters.

I'm not convinced Obama could win even without Palin as GOP VP nominee.

28 posted on 09/20/2008 12:57:58 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

The media in 1980 wasn’t as blatant as now but they were just as biased. The more subtle bias might have been more effective. What there definitely was not in 1980 was alternative media and talk radio. The only news you got was what NBC, CBS or ABC decided to give you. McCain is certainly no Reagan. But I thing Gov. Palin is our new Ronald Reagan.


29 posted on 09/20/2008 1:00:45 PM PDT by Hamilcar_Barca (If Obama is elected the U.S. Soldiers in Iraq will have died in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hamilcar_Barca; CatOwner
The media in 1980 wasn’t as blatant as now but they were just as biased.
I don't but it. The way the media presented the Iranian hostage crisis was a killer for Carter. The days in captivity graphic on every newscast was a direct slap at Carter. Every night. The media was clearly tired of him as well. At best they were neutral.
30 posted on 09/20/2008 1:38:23 PM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeeMoney
I just hope McCains comment about the economy being fundamentally strong doesnt have the same effect.

But it is factually correct. We still have decent growth. Employment numbers are good. Interest rates are low. Fundamentally, as soon as we get the uncertainties in the financial markets behind us, the DOW will soar to 16,000, housing will start raising in values again, and personal incomes will rise.

31 posted on 09/20/2008 1:51:49 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

“But it is factually correct.”

I certainly agree. But most middle of the road, independent Americans don’t see it that way. They trust CBS, ABC and NBC is telling them all they need to know. They don’t pay attention to politics much or delve into the facts of currents events. The rely on the MSM to tell them all they need to know. True, they are far from the doom and gloom Democrats who say we are in a depression, but they also don’t believe the economy is solid either. So that statement made by McCain sent them leaning back towards B. Hussien.

“We still have decent growth. Employment numbers are good. Interest rates are low. Fundamentally, as soon as we get the uncertainties in the financial markets behind us, the DOW will soar to 16,000, housing will start raising in values again, and personal incomes will rise.”

Not if Obama is elected!


32 posted on 09/20/2008 1:58:33 PM PDT by GeeMoney (Hey Obama, it's God BLESS America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; GeeMoney
Interest rates are low.
How do interest rates stay low with the government competing in the credit market to raise this massive amount of money? Supply and demand dictates that more demand for money will drive the cost of it up.
33 posted on 09/20/2008 2:04:48 PM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

The last (rv) Gallup Poll in 2004 had John Kerry +2 over Pres. Bush.


34 posted on 09/20/2008 2:17:02 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Old and Busted: Barack 0bama, New Hotness: Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker

The more I think about it you have a good point. The media liked Ted Kennedy in his primary run against Carter and some that anti-Carter feeling carried over into the general election. I was reading The Reagan Diaries this past year and reading it reminded me how biased the media was against him once he became president. He was really the Great Communicator. There was no Rush Limbaugh, talk radio or FreeRepublic.com to back him up.


35 posted on 09/20/2008 6:57:37 PM PDT by Hamilcar_Barca (If Obama is elected the U.S. Soldiers in Iraq will have died in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Dewey was leading Truman!


36 posted on 09/20/2008 6:59:47 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 88 days away from outliving Sam Sheppard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeeMoney

McCain said that the workers of america were fundamentally strong. Specifically, he said that we had great workers who did a great job, and THOSE fundamentals of our economy were strong.


37 posted on 09/20/2008 7:03:21 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker
Of course it didn't help that all the national newscasts prominently displayed the number of days that the hostages had been held in Iran every night. People were pretty disgusted.

That's how Nightline was started, with a show every night at 11:30 "Americans Held Hostage". We watched that every at college.

I can't imagine ANY of the MSM would do that today, knowing it would hurt a Democratic President.

38 posted on 09/20/2008 7:08:30 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

You know a lot of conservatives like me hate McCain but we’re going to vote for him. I don’t think moderates and many democrats hate McCain. They hate Bush, but respect McCain so I think this knocks down democrat base turnout a bit too.


39 posted on 09/21/2008 12:58:52 PM PDT by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson