Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LaBruzzo considering plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have tubes tied (Louisiana)
The Times-Picayune ^ | Tuesday September 23, 2008 | Mark Waller

Posted on 09/24/2008 2:10:24 PM PDT by BBell

Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said Tuesday he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied.

"We're on a train headed to the future and there's a bridge out, " LaBruzzo said of what he suspects are dangerous demographic trends. "And nobody wants to talk about it."

LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said he is gathering statistics now.

"What I'm really studying is any and all possibilities that we can reduce the number of people that are going from generational welfare to generational welfare, " he said.

He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men.

It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.

LaBruzzo, 38, is white, married to a lawyer, has a toddler daughter and holds a bachelor's degree from Louisiana State University.

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: eugenics; la; nazis; sterilization; welfare
Vasectomies for men also.This story is all the rage on the local talk radio stations. It makes sense but it will probably go no where. There is not forced sterilization so lets not bring up Nazi's and Commie's.
1 posted on 09/24/2008 2:10:24 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BBell

Libs are all for CHOICE

If someone CHOOSES to be sterilized, and pick up a quick $1K, then great.


2 posted on 09/24/2008 2:12:39 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

They can even have a nice ad campaign for the democraps: call it the “pre-abortion that pays you”


3 posted on 09/24/2008 2:13:43 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Beats the usual liberal choice of abortion.


4 posted on 09/24/2008 2:14:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BBell

This is the dumbest thing I’ve read all day. Why bother putting himself out there on the record in support of such a lame brained idea when NOBODY would give up their reproduction capabilities for such a paltry sum.


5 posted on 09/24/2008 2:14:11 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
Just devils advocate, but I don't live in that environment but I hear some of those folks will do anything for a fix...how much would a grand get you???
6 posted on 09/24/2008 2:23:42 PM PDT by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Bob Grant’s Mandatory Sterilization Act revisited.


7 posted on 09/24/2008 2:46:45 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Hell of a deal. $1000 is a deal compared to cradle to grave care of poor folks chillen they can’t afford and whose expenses will be dumped on the general public.


8 posted on 09/24/2008 2:47:44 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

You may be right, but that just makes this idea an exploitation of ill people.


9 posted on 09/24/2008 3:09:07 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

Also I can see the lawyers lining up to sue for big money when a druggie who got sucked into this goes straight and wants kids.


10 posted on 09/24/2008 3:11:37 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BBell
FTA: It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.

Wow. He's proposing eugenics.

Just, wow.

11 posted on 09/24/2008 3:12:28 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Agreed....


12 posted on 09/24/2008 4:02:20 PM PDT by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
This would pay for it's self in a month when you think about the welfare checks ,section 8 housing, free lunches and breakfasts at school, ADHD SS payments for hyper kids, Medicare for low income kids, etc.
13 posted on 09/24/2008 4:04:09 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

The kind of people he is aiming at with this program would sell out for a grand. The only problem is is some shyster lawyer would figure out a way for these people to sue down the road and he would get rich.


14 posted on 09/24/2008 4:11:10 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BBell

I have always been for parents recieving federal assistance or state assistance should get their birth control injection in return for thier check. If you cant afford the child you already have you have no rights to ask the taxpayer for another.


15 posted on 09/24/2008 4:13:20 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
Down here in Louisiana there are a lot of people who are tiring of paying for other peoples kids. Maybe it should catch on everywhere.
16 posted on 09/24/2008 6:39:37 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Conservative Christians will reject it on principle while Democrats and Socialists will reject it and claim principle. Though they’ll both claim morality...only one will be telling the truth.


17 posted on 09/26/2008 6:47:11 AM PDT by Bogey78O (Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

I can’t muster outrage over it. The world has become a place where this isn’t outrageous. Protesting this while cradle to grave socialism and collectivism (which saps people of their souls every day)is like being outrage that a mad kissed the prostitute he just paid.

The people who’ll take up the offer don’t view life the same way as you would... so this just enables them to go on with their life wthout hurting or abusing the charity of others.


18 posted on 09/26/2008 6:51:17 AM PDT by Bogey78O (Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson