Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Matthews Mad Obama Agreed So Much With McCain
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 09/26/2008 8:57:13 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

How disappointed was Chris Matthews with Barack Obama's debate performance tonight? How angry was Matthews at Obama for agreeing so much with John McCain? Enough that Matthews unleashed the ultimate Dem insult, saying Obama reminded him of Richard Nixon.

Matthews first vented his frustration at Obama adviser Linda Douglass.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Linda, my friend, why did your candidate agree so much, openly and relentlessly, with his opponent tonight?

Douglas's answer was to the effect that this is how a bi-partisan Obama would operate as president. After criticizing Obama for mishandling the economic issues in the debate, Matthews turned to Andrea Mitchell, and levelled that supreme Dem slap.

View video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008debates; barackobama; chrismatthews; debates; johnmccain; mccain; mccainpalin; nobama08; obama; obamabiden; richardnixon; thethrillisgone; tingleboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Thanks because Obama is smarter than Mathews - but that dosen’t say much, does it?

Obama wants to get intot he White House desparately. He KNOWS McCain is viewed as better on foreign plicy than he is. So he agreed with McCain on most issues except Iraq, to pre-empt him in the eyes of independents on that subject.

But an @$$ like Mathews wouldn’t know that.


21 posted on 09/26/2008 9:05:33 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Matthews Mad Obama Agreed So Much With McCain

If I were McCain, my next ad would feature all those "I agree with Senator McCain" statements from Obama.
22 posted on 09/26/2008 9:05:38 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

what? no tingle? aw..


23 posted on 09/26/2008 9:06:26 PM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olddemocrat

DONE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec3aC8ZJZTc


24 posted on 09/26/2008 9:07:26 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“By the way, I don’t think Nixon was known for being bi-partisan and humble (if that’s what Matthews criticizes Obmama for).”

Before my time, but I think Nixon was criticized in that first debate with Kennedy for letting set the tone (well, in addition to the five o’clock shadow problem).

Matthews thinks Obama was too passive and deferential.

I agree. But then I thought McCain, who’s been portrayed by the MSM as an idiot relative to Obama, showed that he’s forgotten more about foreign and defense policy than Obama knows.


25 posted on 09/26/2008 9:07:40 PM PDT by nyc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
If I were McCain, my next ad would feature all those "I agree with Senator McCain" statements from Obama.

Where have you been? The McCain campaign had such an ad out about 10 minutes after the debate was over. It is on you tube now but I don't have the link, perhaps someone else does. It has Bozo saying "I agree with McCain" over and over. Great ad.

26 posted on 09/26/2008 9:08:25 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

That ad is already out.


27 posted on 09/26/2008 9:08:40 PM PDT by BelegStrongbow (what part of 'mias gunaikos andra' do Episcopalians not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Another, they already have an ad on youtube showing the debate and Obama saying numerous times, "I agree with McCain.

It went up about an hour ago.

28 posted on 09/26/2008 9:08:56 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I am sorry but I cannot take Chris seriously on Political Commentary.


29 posted on 09/26/2008 9:12:04 PM PDT by Merta (Who is the only parental unit that California Democrats wish preserved? The Aunt(Aunt War=ANWR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
I can remember Chris Matthews filling in for Rush Limbaugh on the Radio...

I remember Rush interviewing Chrissy one day, at the height of the "Scandal in the Oral Office". Chrissy really ripped into Clinton, and went into all the reasons Slick had sullied the office of the President. Oh, well, I guess he got over it...

30 posted on 09/26/2008 9:12:54 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

The McCain campaign had precisely such an ad up even before the debate ended!


31 posted on 09/26/2008 9:13:39 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Keeping track of the MSM so you don't have to!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Oh nasty!!! But you are right!


32 posted on 09/26/2008 9:15:20 PM PDT by nclaurel (I think therefore I vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: olddemocrat
It came out within 5 minutes at the end of the debate. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec3aC8ZJZTc
33 posted on 09/26/2008 9:16:09 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Exactly, he used to be really spot on, now he is just sort of a Obamaton and unwatchable.

“so Andrea, did Obama win huge, win big, or win by enough”


34 posted on 09/26/2008 9:17:17 PM PDT by padre35 (Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nyc1

There was a really good article in a recent AmSpec to the effect that Nixon’s real boo-boo in the famous televised debate with JFK had nothing to do with his five o’ clock shadow and everything to do with the fact that he pretty much agreed with everything JFK said. Then again, so would most of us back then.

The next time round he did not repeat the mistake (then again, the sixties were on, the dems had radicalized and the game had changed) he came on as the law-and-order candidate and wiped the floor with Eugene McCarthy.

The author also mentioned Wendell Willkie in 1940 (businessman-turned-politician he was really out of his depth) he too, failed to differentiate his platform from FDR’s and paid the penalty, ditto for Thomas E. Dewey vs. Harry Truman who also piddled away his own advantages by politely playing dem lite.

It’s only been 12 years but I can’t even remember what the hell hapless Bob Dole was FOR let alone AGAINST (beyond being a war hero and a dear sweet old guy, etc.).


35 posted on 09/26/2008 9:21:43 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I have a bracelet too!

Ahhhh errh aahh what’s his name:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r_jTgGeVU4


36 posted on 09/26/2008 9:22:35 PM PDT by cruise_missile (''Edward-Jones -> Outrageous commissions for lousy investment advice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sox_the_cat

Yeah I felt that way when he “agreed” with McCain on Russia. He’s fought EVERYTHING McCain stands for on Foreign Policy but when it comes to Russia he “agrees”. He was too busy on the campaign trail to pay much attention to that situation.

It’s also funny watching him say he wants a troop increase in Afghanistan when he was against the one in Iraq saying that it wouldn’t work.


37 posted on 09/26/2008 9:24:01 PM PDT by CommieCutter (THE BIAS OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS FINALLY HIT THE MAINSTREAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No suprise, both candidates are pathetic liberals. They make GWB look like George Washington.


38 posted on 09/26/2008 9:27:48 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Palin is sugar on a turd ... No mas Juan "Traitor Rat" McAmnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

more like schpincter tingle, as in butt puckering knowing his favorite thrill maker got pushed around tonight.


39 posted on 09/26/2008 9:29:59 PM PDT by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Uh Nixon ran against Hubert Humphrey and the election of 68 was no wiping the floor. With George wallace in the race the election was about 45 not 50 states. The results went into the night, not quite as long as 60 but long enough to make it interesting. Nixon won the popular vote by .7%.


40 posted on 09/26/2008 9:36:11 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (Freedom is purchased not with gold, but with steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson