Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blunt Gives Side-by-Side Details of Final Bill
NRO-The Corner ^ | 9/28/08 | Kathryn Lopez

Posted on 09/28/2008 9:02:50 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo

A side-by-side (it's a Word doc) on the various plans, from Roy Blount's office.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; bailout; congress; economy; financialcrisis; goldenparachutes; rats; rescuepackage; rinos; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 next last
I am much more supportive of this than the Paulson bill. This makes the insurance program mandatory AND PAULSON ONLY GETS $350 BLN. He has to go back and ask for the other $350 bln from Congress.
1 posted on 09/28/2008 9:02:51 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Since you’re the finance expert, this won’t make us scream?


2 posted on 09/28/2008 9:07:15 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Can’t open link. Error message corrupt link


3 posted on 09/28/2008 9:07:58 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Still a crappy plan

I look forward to his future replacement (Cantor or Pence) who is a real republican.


4 posted on 09/28/2008 9:08:24 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi; Thane_Banquo
"Since you’re the finance expert, this won’t make us scream?"

Excellent question. On the "scream meter" of 1 to 10... how loud are we going to scream?

5 posted on 09/28/2008 9:08:53 AM PDT by avacado (Obama's response to a crisis: "Call me if you need me...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

IF this word doc is legit, ACORN is out, insurance is mandatory. It appears to meet most of the House Repubs issues. Thanks to Blunt’s office for publishing facts.


6 posted on 09/28/2008 9:09:16 AM PDT by aragona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
After reading it, I think its a pretty good bill! Its not perfect but it turns out the market provisions are mandatory as opposed to merely optional. And the Treasury Secretary will not get all the money he wanted upfront and there will be oversight. Its about the best that could be achieved under the current circumstances. I would rather have no bailout at all but the enemy of the good is insistence on the perfect.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 09/28/2008 9:09:30 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Thank God Acorn is out.


8 posted on 09/28/2008 9:09:39 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Thank God Acorn is out.


9 posted on 09/28/2008 9:09:40 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
If after 5 years the government has a net loss of taxpayer funds as a consequence of the purchase program, the President will be required to submit a legislative proposal to recoup such funds from program beneficiaries.

And if after 5 years donuts don't start falling from the sky, we'll all fly up in the air and levy taxes on the clouds.

10 posted on 09/28/2008 9:11:24 AM PDT by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Man. FOX “news” is in Full Obama mode this morning. I guess they’re getting the “tingle.”


11 posted on 09/28/2008 9:11:26 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When Republicans do it, it's "corruption." When DemocRATS do it, it's a financial crisis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You were after a bail out from day one.


12 posted on 09/28/2008 9:11:49 AM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
Well, the insurance program is much better. Still $350 bln. to Wall Street, but that's half of what Paulson Goldman Sachs asked for. They have to go back to Congress for the rest.

I think a number of firms will prefer the insurance program, because it will allow them to secure the profits quickly from assets that are valued at an irrationally low level. If the amount of assets insured counts against the $350 bln, that would be a huge coup.

13 posted on 09/28/2008 9:12:14 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Affordable Housing Slush Fund (ACORN Fund). OUT.


14 posted on 09/28/2008 9:12:37 AM PDT by uncommonsense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I’m still skeptical - what exactly does it mean that the “market provisions are mandatory”? And exactly what is the initial $350b going to be used for? At the end of the day, are we still buying mortgage messes?


15 posted on 09/28/2008 9:12:45 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57; All; FlingWingFlyer; F15Eagle; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SolidWood; SJackson; Munz; Quix; ...

250B – Immediately available to the Secretary.
100B – Available upon report to Congress.
350B – Available ONLY upon Congressional action.

Requirement to establish mandatory insurance/guarantee program at no expense to the taxpayer. “Pay to play” for participating companies, based on risk.

250B – Immediately available to the Secretary.
100B – Available upon report to Congress.
350B – Available ONLY upon Congressional action.

Requirement to establish mandatory insurance/guarantee program at no expense to the taxpayer. “Pay to play” for participating companies, based on risk.

Workable prohibitions on executive compensation to ensure bad actors are not rewarded. In a total takeover (like what happened with AIG), there will be no golden parachutes or severance pay. For equity participation, over $300M total ban for top 5 executives on golden parachutes and tax deduction limit on compensation above $500,000.

Establishment of bipartisan oversight commission, split evenly between minority and majority.
Practical reporting requirements to ensure proper reports to Congress and the public.

“Say on Pay”
Union Take Over of Corporate Boards;Affordable Housing Slush Fund (ACORN Fund);Bankruptcy “Cramdown” (aka, trial bar give-away); - OUT

If after 5 years the government has a net loss of taxpayer funds as a consequence of the purchase program, the President will be required to submit a legislative proposal to recoup such funds from program beneficiaries.


16 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:03 AM PDT by Perdogg (Vice President Sarah H Palin - Make it happen !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

and it wouldn’t have happened if the House GOP didn’t scream and make a fuss and said “wait a minute! let’s think this through and find an alternative”


17 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:04 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Just let Sarah be Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

I’m scratching my head....what are the dems getting out of the bill? According to this document, the dems are giving up everything sans a few oversight comprimises.

I don’t know if this doc represents the details of the bill accurately....not making an accusation, just want to see the official bill.


18 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:07 AM PDT by Doug TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

is it the word doc you can’t open?


19 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:32 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Oh please, like they’re going to say no to more money? Screw that.


20 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:42 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Michelle Obama...Queen of the Damned (courtesy of CougarGA7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

Something has to be done, unless you want our economy crushed, a recession and a democrat in the White House. This bill sounds a lot better and under the circumstances I support it.


21 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:42 AM PDT by jrooney (Obama's mentor says God Da*n America. That explains Obama's refusal to put his hand over his heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Hope this works. From the Word doc to FR:

Side-by-Side Comparison of Rescue Legislation        

Issue

Paulson Plan

Frank-Dodd

Final Bill

$

700B

700B – Delivered in 150B traunches that can be delayed by  Congressional disapproval (and a Presidential signature)

250B – Immediately available to the Secretary.

100B – Available upon report to Congress.

350B – Available ONLY upon Congressional action.

 

Insurance (House Republican Mode)

 

 

Requirement to establish mandatory insurance/guarantee program at no expense to the taxpayer.  “Pay to play” for participating companies, based on risk.

 

Executive Compensation

 

Far reaching executive compensation standards that would affect companies not even involved in this financial crisis.  Additionally, the bill lowered the deduction on executive pay to $400,000 for ALL companies.

Workable prohibitions on executive compensation to ensure bad actors are not rewarded. In a total takeover (like what happened with AIG), there will be no golden parachutes or severance pay.  For equity participation, over $300M total ban for top 5 executives on golden parachutes and tax deduction limit on compensation above $500,000.

 

Oversight/Transparency

 

Onerous, unworkable and repetitive reporting and oversight requirements, hindering proper implementation of program. 

Establishment of bipartisan oversight commission, split evenly between minority and majority.

Practical reporting requirements to ensure proper reports to Congress and the public.

 

If after 5 years the government has a net loss of taxpayer funds as a consequence of the purchase program, the President will be required to submit a legislative proposal to recoup such funds from program beneficiaries.

 

“Say on Pay”

Union Take Over of Corporate Boards

 

So-called “say on pay” or “proxy access” which propose to mandate a nonbinding shareholder vote on proxy access and other corporate governance issues for all companies in which the Treasury Department buys a direct stake in certain assets. 

 

OUT

Affordable Housing Slush Fund (ACORN Fund)

 

Included a giveaway that would force taxpayers to bankroll a slush fund for ACORN – an organization fraught with controversy for, among other scandals, its fraudulent voter registration activities on behalf of Democratic candidates. 

 

OUT

Bankruptcy “Cramdown” (aka, trial bar give-away)

 

Included so-called “cramdown” provisions allowing bankruptcy judges to reduce mortgage principal under the guise of helping those at risk of foreclosure.  If enacted into law, the provision would be a bonanza for trial lawyers and undercut the effectiveness of any economic recovery effort by making it even harder to value mortgage-backed securities.

 

OUT


 

Mark-to-Market Accounting

 

 

GAO study on the impacts of mark-to-market accounting standards and effects on the banking crisis.  Restatement of existing authority to suspend mark-to-market.

 

Equity/Warrants

 

Mandatory equity interest in all participating firms. 

Mandatory equity interests in total takeover scenario.  Proportional equity interest based on percentage of assets sold if deemed appropriate Secretary.

Tax benefits for community banks

 

 

Ability for community banks to take capital losses on GSE assets against ordinary income.

 


22 posted on 09/28/2008 9:13:50 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX
I’m scratching my head....what are the dems getting out of the bill?

They are getting to go home without having this albatross hung solely around their necks.

23 posted on 09/28/2008 9:14:27 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

much better than original which would have:
Far reaching executive compensation standards that would affect companies not even involved in this financial crisis.

sorry commies!


24 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:00 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Just let Sarah be Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
$700 billion to $250 billion. By that alone, the House Republicans did well.

Will the Dems continue to "blame" (credit) McCain with the non-breakdown of the original non-agreement? I hope so, but I have my doubts.

25 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:25 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

is all profit going to retiring debt ?


26 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:32 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Dave Ramsey (and I believe Newt) has said that the “insurance” is a good idea and would remove 2/3rds of the problem. He (and Newt) also believe that the removal of the “mark to market” rule (which is way above my paygrade) needs to be gone. What you posted looks like it makes a pretty good attempt at both of these items.


27 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:43 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I'm against a bailout. So what's your alternative? To just let the economy tank and people lose their savings, their businesses and their jobs? The truth is none of us like the fact the government has to stabilize the financial markets. But the consequences of doing nothing at all are just too terrible to contemplate.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

28 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:45 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

-Our economy will not be crushed. I work in finance, have graduate degrees, and certifications. We will enter a normal recession. This plans props up income and property values for more taxation. In a recession the government and private companies cuts away inefficent programs for future growth. Not doing so prolongs things = depression.

Our party must be the party of the individual. It must not sell out the individual to cater to the group. No greater challenge faces our society today than ensuring that each one of us can maintain his dignity and his identity in an increasingly complex, centralized society.

Extreme taxation, excessive controls, oppressive government competition with business, galloping inflation, frustrated minorities and forgotten Americans are not the products of free enterprise. They are the residue of centralized bureaucracy, of government by a self-anointed elite.

Our party must be based on the kind of leadership that grows and takes its strength from the people. Any organization is in actuality only the lengthened shadow of its members. A political party is a mechanical structure created to further a cause. The cause, not the mechanism, brings and holds the members together. And our cause must be to rediscover, reassert and reapply America’s spiritual heritage to our national affairs.


29 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:56 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

What do you mean by “Market Provisions”?

Is this it?

“GAO study on the impacts of mark-to-market accounting standards and effects on the banking crisis. Restatement of existing authority to suspend mark-to-market.”

This sounds sort of nebulous.


30 posted on 09/28/2008 9:15:58 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Congress: every law they make is a joke and every joke they tell becomes a law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
We don't have enough information to judge if the provisions of the insurance are in fact mandatory. I had heard a number of these provisions were OPTIONAL.

This comparison is a spreadsheet-type summary.

Where is the text of the actual bill?

31 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:04 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

It still doesn’t address the primary cause of the problem - borrower greed and misbehavior. After all, THEY borrowed the money — lenders didn’t put a gun to their heads.

We are treating the housing and mortgage market crisis like a bad drug prevention plan. There is no penalty to drug users (other than you may suffer or die), but we will try to reduce the amount of drugs available. Does anyone think this would work if we were trying to solve the cocaine/heroin problem?

Borrowers should suffer for their folly. But since they are voters, that isn’t going to happen.


32 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:06 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

HMMM, thats all I got to say. And SUCK IT ACORN/LA RAZA!


33 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:31 AM PDT by redstateconfidential ("Go to the mattresses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX

Boehners office said they have been typing it up since this morning and should be available later today for us to see.

For now, I don’t believe anything until I see it in writing.


34 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:41 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Michelle Obama...Queen of the Damned (courtesy of CougarGA7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

ok so let’s get this over with

man this really wasn’t what this election was supposed to be about


35 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:45 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Just let Sarah be Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX

“I’m scratching my head....what are the dems getting out of the bill?”

_______________________

Perhaps an agreement not to call for an investigation as to the extent of their involvement in the whole mess.


36 posted on 09/28/2008 9:16:46 AM PDT by 1curiousmind (Call me if you need me, just not at 3am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX
The Dems know that laws may be changed in the future. They believe they will win the Presidency, or at worst, a veto proof Congress.

They are giving up nothing other than October/November/December/January.

37 posted on 09/28/2008 9:17:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Frank/Dodd?!!! Are those two bandits getting credit for this?


38 posted on 09/28/2008 9:17:08 AM PDT by misharu (US Congress = children without adult supervision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

It is still a big rip-off of the American taxpayer.
An outrage!
But who’s gonna do anything about it?
Will McCain vote against it?
Or “present”?


39 posted on 09/28/2008 9:17:19 AM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
Thank God Acorn is out.

But will the nuts be hurt in all this?

40 posted on 09/28/2008 9:18:02 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus
Market provisions are mandatory, meaning the Treasury is required to create the market-paid insurance program.
41 posted on 09/28/2008 9:18:34 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
I mean the insurance and the suspension of mark to market rule. They are mandatory and go a long way towards fixing the root of the crisis. Its not just all on the taxpayers. So I'm mostly pleased with it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

42 posted on 09/28/2008 9:18:47 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Tell me this is really, really what the Democrats agreed to sign-off on and not just a Republican wish-list? Is this the real deal (as far as we can determine now)?


43 posted on 09/28/2008 9:19:49 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX
I’m scratching my head....what are the dems getting out of the bill?

They will not see ads that begin "President Bush and the Democrats in Congress gave $700 billion of your tax dollars to bail out Wall Street's millionaire executives...."

Pity, but I guess it's better than bread lines.

44 posted on 09/28/2008 9:20:15 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

Opened for me.


45 posted on 09/28/2008 9:20:44 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Thanks- makes it pretty easy to compare
Keep calling the stinker plan the “Pelosi-Reid-Dodd-Frank Goldman Sachs Bail Out”


46 posted on 09/28/2008 9:21:29 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
It still doesn’t address the primary cause of the problem - borrower greed and misbehavior. After all, THEY borrowed the money — lenders didn’t put a gun to their heads.

Market will solve that itself by never again extending mortgage credit to risky borrowers. "Liar loans" are dead. Market is no longer extending credit to subprime borrowers, and I doubt there will be much more than a tiny market for such mortgages going forward.

47 posted on 09/28/2008 9:21:32 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
With these provisions, only the most desperate companies will take advantage.
This seems rational to me, but expect the MSM to criticize the Repub. changes as making the real estate pool more “toxic”.
48 posted on 09/28/2008 9:21:37 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Looks like one way to play this is to buy stock in selected community banks. The entire sub-sector has been beaten down mercilessly.


49 posted on 09/28/2008 9:22:01 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: misharu

The Frank/Dodd bill is being compared to the final bill that will be put forward.


50 posted on 09/28/2008 9:22:10 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson