Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton Defends John McCain’s Debate Decision– Blames Dems For Meltdown!
stop the aclu ^ | Nitya Venkataraman

Posted on 09/29/2008 1:25:09 AM PDT by Lorianne

Going very much against the media meme that the current financial crisis is all George W. Bush and the Republicans’ fault, Bill Clinton on Thursday told ABC’s Chris Cuomo that Democrats for years have been “resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” True. President Bush warned about reforming Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae 17 times this year alone. John McCain’s reform bill was blocked by dems in 2005. Thank you, Bill Clinton!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: x42

1 posted on 09/29/2008 1:25:09 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Wow!


2 posted on 09/29/2008 1:27:20 AM PDT by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

secondary sources:

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/the-home-front/2008/09/25/fannie-freddie-takeover-takes-out-small-bank.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHj8-HSi5AA&eurl= —— http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/09/25/fox-news-blames-democrats-financial-crisis-bill-clinton-agrees -


3 posted on 09/29/2008 1:28:17 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

he reeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaalllllllyyyyy doesn’t want Obama to win!


4 posted on 09/29/2008 1:29:22 AM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42 - 12/17/45, d. 11/1/85)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07; Lorianne

Its not hurting Obama any apparently.


5 posted on 09/29/2008 1:31:35 AM PDT by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

A sure sign we’ve reached rock bottom (or hard left): When Bill Clinton is actually the voice of moderation and reason.


6 posted on 09/29/2008 1:32:26 AM PDT by PressurePoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

How hard will it be for the media to throw Clinton under the bus?

Seriously think about that, to the left, Billy Boy is their hero, they basically throw their panties up on stage when he’s speaking.

But now he’s speaking out against the messiah, the media can’t have that. Not from someone as high up in regard as Clinton.

So, can the media get rid of him, clean the political dialogue of his comments, or are they forced to report and give him media time, for being Bill?


7 posted on 09/29/2008 1:33:21 AM PDT by Brytani (Abortion does not make you a real woman - it makes you a murderer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Uh..so he climbed over Congress, and brought this to the public, or did he veto CRA?

No? Didn't think so.

8 posted on 09/29/2008 1:35:29 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
It's because of the press spin. All the networks have spun this as a GOP mess cleaned up by Pelosi and Reid.
9 posted on 09/29/2008 1:40:57 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

Well, his famous pointy fingers never did learn to point at himself (I’ll be kind and chalk that up to human nature) .... still he’s right about the others.


10 posted on 09/29/2008 1:42:44 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are voting for John McCain.
11 posted on 09/29/2008 1:44:55 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Eeeew. You had to bring up those fingers. Eeeeeew.


12 posted on 09/29/2008 1:45:28 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PressurePoint

I honestly don’t think it has as much to do with where WE are standing, but where Obama is standing. If he wins in November, Hillary has no shot in 2012.

The thing is — it has been said that Bill Clinton HIMSELF proposed some kind of oversight when he was President. That was shot down by his own party. It could be a case of “payback” and “I told you so”...


13 posted on 09/29/2008 1:57:10 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Plus... Bill is always worried about his ‘legacy’...... ;)


14 posted on 09/29/2008 1:59:37 AM PDT by BossLady ("Dennis K. Eads" ---The name on the POW Bracelet I wore when I was 7 years old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Saving


15 posted on 09/29/2008 1:59:45 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
Obama simply says...Hey, it wasn't me...I wasn't part of the establishment. Remember. I was just a Community Organizer...

which leads us right back to rabble rousers....Rev. Wrong and Jesse Jackson

16 posted on 09/29/2008 2:22:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The the Clintons want McCain to win then it suggests to me that they believe that the tough times are only getting started.


17 posted on 09/29/2008 2:23:45 AM PDT by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; PressurePoint

My armchair prediction, no matter who wins this election Hillary will not be a factor come 2012.


18 posted on 09/29/2008 2:35:20 AM PDT by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Seriously think about that, to the left, Billy Boy is their hero, they basically throw their panties up on stage when he’s speaking.

If you'd like to get a "dose" of just how the looney left is responding to him, check out DUh...they've got a few threads going and the things they are saying about him are really eye-opening. They're bouncing off the walls over there, but then again, that's a daily occurrence for them.

19 posted on 09/29/2008 2:44:37 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

They don’t want Obama to win because Hilary wants to run in four years.


20 posted on 09/29/2008 2:44:56 AM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I have become a Bill Clinton admirer. He is older now, he has had open heart surgery and he has been President. He knows the kind of situation the nation is in and he is smart. He knows the genesis of our current and very serious dilemma. He also knows that history is going to reveal much about our time if it is not totally rewritten. The other thing about age is that people sometimes become mellow enough to admit their mistakes and bold enough to speak their minds. I just hope President Clinton will continue to go against the “bandwagon” and speak the truth when he thinks it will benefit America. Thanks, Mr. President, for your thoughts!


21 posted on 09/29/2008 3:02:31 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Hmmm...article last week about how 0bama was the lawyer on the case the forced a Chicago bank to loan money...

Don’t have the title so search doesn’t work to find it and I didn’t comment on it at the time.

But it is out there in the ether of FR somewhere...?

The truth being 0bama was more a part of it than he would ever want the public to know.


22 posted on 09/29/2008 3:09:56 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazzlite

I think Clinton is a socialist at heart. But he realizes that free market capitalism is the goose that lays the golden eggs that make it possible to redistribute the wealth. Obama on the other hand is a pure marxist communist. He believes in collectivism no matter how bad it gets all share in the misery. No golden goose is needed in his world.


23 posted on 09/29/2008 3:35:28 AM PDT by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Now that he was being honest, the follow up question should have been, ‘did you or hillary pull the trigger on Vince Foster?’


24 posted on 09/29/2008 4:03:46 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07

he reeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaalllllllyyyyy doesn’t want Obama to win!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

No, he doesn’t, you can bet that Slick Willie knows more than most about just what kind of disastrous leader Obamalamadingdong would be and with all his grievious failings I still don’t believe Bill Clinton wants to see the land of his birth destroyed.


25 posted on 09/29/2008 5:14:04 AM PDT by RipSawyer (What's black and white and red all over? Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

The the Clintons want McCain to win then it suggests to me that they believe that the tough times are only getting started.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Of course they believe that, what possible reason could anyone name to believe the tough times are NOT just getting started? Have you noted that the blue sky, pie in the sky cheerleaders seem to have stopped posting on FR? Come on somebody, tell us that everything is beautiful in its own way.


26 posted on 09/29/2008 5:18:24 AM PDT by RipSawyer (What's black and white and red all over? Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PressurePoint

Clinton has been getting little digs in here and there for months. The Clinton’s campaigning for Obama is lukewarm at best.

The focus of the Clinton’s wrath has shifted from the VRWC (whom they no longer view as a threat) to Obama and the Dem leadership. Not only do they want to sink Obama, they want to submarine the Dem leaders who abandoned them in favor of Obama at a crucial point in the primary. The Clintons never forget a slight.


27 posted on 09/29/2008 5:19:53 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Obummer knows that whoever BJ supports, loses.

Pray for W, Gov Palin and Our Troops


28 posted on 09/29/2008 5:30:46 AM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

The Clintons were and are into power. Granted, they use their power to perpetuate their influence – some of which is socialistic. But their political machine was trumped by a community organizer operating under pure Marxist/communist techniques.
I hated the Clintons. I didn’t know it could get so much worse.
GO BILL & HILL – Take out the punk!


29 posted on 09/29/2008 5:40:26 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Bill Clinton on Thursday told ABC’s Chris Cuomo that Democrats for years have been “resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac”

The pomposity of Bill Clinton never ceases to amaze me. Resisting efforts by me to put standards on Fannie/Freddie? It was Bill and his cohorts that lowered the standards that caused this mess in the first place:

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, even into the early 1990s, weren't the juggernauts they'd later be.

After entering office in 1993, he extensively rewrote Fannie's and Freddie's rules.

In so doing, he turned the two quasi-private, mortgage-funding firms into a semi-nationalized monopoly that dispensed cash to markets, made loans to large Democratic voting blocs and handed favors, jobs and money to political allies. This potent mix led inevitably to corruption and the Fannie-Freddie collapse.

Despite warnings of trouble at Fannie and Freddie, in 1994 Clinton unveiled his National Homeownership Strategy, which broadened the CRA in ways Congress never intended.

Rather than submit legislation that the GOP-led Congress was almost sure to reject, Clinton ordered Robert Rubin's Treasury Department to rewrite the rules in 1995.

The rewrite, as City Journal noted back in 2000, "made getting a satisfactory CRA rating harder." Banks were given strict new numerical quotas and measures for the level of "diversity" in their loan portfolios. Getting a good CRA rating was key for a bank that wanted to expand or merge with another.

Clinton's HUD secretary, Andrew Cuomo, "made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to the country's current crisis," the liberal Village Voice noted. Among those decisions were changes that let Fannie and Freddie get into subprime loan markets in a big way.

Other rule changes gave Fannie and Freddie extraordinary leverage, allowing them to hold just 2.5% of capital to back their investments, vs. 10% for banks.

Since they could borrow at lower rates than banks due to implicit government guarantees for their debt, the government-sponsored enterprises boomed.

How A Clinton-Era Rule Rewrite Made Subprime Crisis Inevitable

30 posted on 09/29/2008 5:58:27 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson