Skip to comments.
VP Debate Moderator Pens Pro-Obama Book [book release date is January 20, 2009] [media bias]
Fox News ^
| October 01, 2008
Posted on 10/01/2008 6:48:34 AM PDT by grundle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
10/01/2008 6:48:35 AM PDT
by
grundle
To: grundle
There is nothing to discuss anymore...she needs to step down.
Have two fish bowls, one with Dem question, one with Repub
question. Person from the audience grabs the question
go at it you two! END OF DEBATE.
2
posted on
10/01/2008 6:50:29 AM PDT
by
Texas4ever
(SIT DOWN JUNIOR :))
To: grundle
"Ahhhhh I am humbled by your almighty presence great one!
To: grundle
I did not know this, for I am Ten Second Tom.
4
posted on
10/01/2008 6:50:41 AM PDT
by
soupcon
To: grundle
Palin should call him on this, right up front, in front of millions, and grill him like a spitted hog.
In addition to his militant anti-American associates and his abjectly marxist positions, Obama is directly tied to the current financial crisis.
I'M VOTING FOR SARAH
5
posted on
10/01/2008 6:50:47 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Texas4ever
My Friend™, now is not the time for partisanship. We must reach across the aisle to those who wish to destroy us, and help them look good doing so.
6
posted on
10/01/2008 6:52:07 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(It [MSNBC] is a stunningly dishonest network. -Newt Gingrich)
To: grundle
In fairness Jim Corsi should moderate the next debate.
7
posted on
10/01/2008 6:53:25 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: grundle
She should graciously step aside or be forced to yield to a more objective moderator. As professionals we must be concerned about the APPEARANCE of a lack of objectivity.
8
posted on
10/01/2008 6:53:35 AM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(I want to hear the sound of tumbrels....)
To: grundle
She should graciously step aside or be forced to yield to a more objective moderator. As professionals we must be concerned about the APPEARANCE of a lack of objectivity.
9
posted on
10/01/2008 6:53:38 AM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(I want to hear the sound of tumbrels....)
To: Rapscallion
She cannot graciously step aside. She broke her ankle last night.
10
posted on
10/01/2008 6:56:33 AM PDT
by
i_dont_chat
(The elephant is dancing for the lady from Alaska)
To: Rapscallion
"She should graciously step aside or be forced to yield to a more objective moderator. As professionals we must be concerned about the APPEARANCE of a lack of objectivity." Surely you jest! She's a lefty and lefty's are above partisanship, doncha know. /s
And they most certainly don't 'do' graciousness and yield to no one!
11
posted on
10/01/2008 6:58:27 AM PDT
by
sweet_diane
("They hate us cause they ain't us.")
To: grundle
If she is allowed to moderate then I am convinced McCain wants to lose.
12
posted on
10/01/2008 6:59:36 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: grundle
OK lets suppose Ms. Ifill recuses herself from the debate moderator role. How is her replacement, also guaranteed to be from the MSM, going to be any different?
13
posted on
10/01/2008 7:00:15 AM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: Texas4ever
How does she deal with Condi and Clarence Thomas in the book?
To: grundle
Biased Fox News (in the bag for Obama) sees NO PROBLEM
with PBS (in the bag for Obama) having failed their affirmative duty
to disclose the financial and ethical relationships of Gwen Ifill (and others in the bag for Obama)
BEFORE sandbagging the GOP, for the DNC-PBS-NBC-CBS-ABC-CNN-AP-FOX Axis of Evil.
15
posted on
10/01/2008 7:01:28 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Rapscallion
How would she or Obama feel if a White Supremest were to be the moderator? Isn’t that fair play?
16
posted on
10/01/2008 7:01:51 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: i_dont_chat
To: Jeff Head
Let her moderate! It is pure cowardise cry out UNFAIR etc. If Sarah can’t confront this woman successfully, we are backing the wrong team.
18
posted on
10/01/2008 7:03:26 AM PDT
by
Broker
(VOTE McCain/Palin! !)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
If you are looking at fairness, that question is irrelevant. Any court would say she is not able in the minds of people to give a fair and unpartial debate.
Therefore she is starting from a flawed perspective.
It wont be fair to her , to Palin or to whats his name.
On any side someone will have something to say, that she was to easy because...she was overly cautious therefore Sarah benefited....and if she is fair and Sarah loses...well then she gave Whats his name the upper hand....you see this is a lose lose situation....
Better just get someone else like......Oprah! Or Someone from the View!
19
posted on
10/01/2008 7:04:52 AM PDT
by
Texas4ever
(SIT DOWN JUNIOR :))
To: grundle
post-racial politicians It burns me when Obama is classified as such. In some areas, he's capturing 98% of the black vote, and in all areas, the message is that any white person who fails to vote for him is a racist.
There is nothing "post-racial" about Obama. Nothing. It's all about the skin, baby! That's all he has going for him.
20
posted on
10/01/2008 7:05:15 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Michelle, spare me your phony outrage, you know as well as I do that dress makes your butt look big)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson