Skip to comments.US State Department Subpoena Denial in Obama Eligibility Suit
Posted on 10/03/2008 8:51:01 AM PDT by bonnieblue4me
Update on latest information from Berg v. Obama regarding eligibility for POTUS.
Where are the GOP national ads on this??? Lack of gonads.
Remember when someone accessed Barak Obama’s passport records and we found out later that the company that did so was owned by a major Obama supporter....
The the whole story just fell off the radar screen....
I wonder if all of a sudden certain records cannot be found or appear to be tampered with....
>>>I wonder if all of a sudden certain records cannot be found or appear to be tampered with....
Oh, I’m positive that is the case.
But I am not getting the impression that HIPAA has anything to do with proof of citizenship. I’m reading about HIPAA now and I only see reference to protection of health insurance coverage.
I guarantee you that the original birth certificate lists Barack Hussein as being an illegitimate muslim.
What I don’t understand is, if Obama has nothing to hide, produce the damn records already! Give permission, sign away! It’s scary to think he has a lawyer, Jeffrey Sandler who is part of CAIR. It fits though.
Its the work of a 527 and not McCain or RNC
And going the other way would have been no picnic either. Honolulu to what, Hong Kong or Singapore, then on to somewhere else then Cairo then Nairobi?
One of Obama’s lawyers is involved with CAIR, too.
Actually, it was not that difficult. The First nonstop transpacific flight began in Sabishiro Beach, Japan, and flew 4,860 mi to Wenatchee, Wash., in about 41 hours back in OCtober 1935.
In 1961, Pan American had direct flights from SF to Tokyo; American Airlines had direct flights from LA to Hong Kong, and Quantas had direct flights from Sydney to LA.
Even today, though, you can't get a flight directly from either coast to Kenya.
State Department basically doing the CYA routine and covering their butts.
Seems to me if he's hiding behind anything, it's Berg's incompetence. Did you actually read what was said in the letter?
The procedure by which a party seeking official information from a non-party federal agency is to request the information under the agencys Touhy regulations. See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen 340 U.S. 462 (1951) Your requests do not comply with those requirements.
In addition to serving the Executive Office of the Office of the Legal Adviser, as required under 22 C.F.R. 172.2, the requests also must be set forth in writing, and with as much specificity as possible, the nature and relevance of the official information sought. 22 C.F.R. 172.5(a).
The letter only said there may be Privacy Act issues. They were unable to determine that because Berg's request didn't meet with federal regulations and lacked specificity.
They're just abiding by the laws, rules and regulations that they operate under.
And isn't that ultimately what Berg is supposedly asking Obama to do? Abide by the laws? If so, then how can the State Department be criticized for doing what Berg is expecting of Obama?
Sandler is the DNC's lawyer. Not Obama's.
In case no one has noticed, Berg's suit was filed against Obama, the DNC and the FEC. Not just Obama.
Sandler has been the DNC's General Counsel since before Berg ever filed his lawsuit, so it would stand to reason that he would represent the DNC in any lawsuits filed against them.
Obama’s given name at birth was Barry. He, himself, decided to start going by the name Barack later. I know he was born while his mother was in Kenya which means he is NOT an American citizen. It’s possible that he may be illegitimate too.
how can the State Department be criticized for doing what Berg is expecting of Obama?
***Because if the tables were turned, they’d have sent McCain’s pertinent information without haste.
make that WITH haste. Without delay...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.