Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fix the Bailout to Help Homeowners
Wall Street Journal advertisement, page C5 | October 3, 2008 | Thomas Peterffy

Posted on 10/03/2008 8:56:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Amend [the bailout bill] to allow the Treasury to provide direct mortgage assistance to all American homeowners.

If the Treasury were to pay first $250 of every American's primary residential mortgage each month for five years, the value of all mortgage-backed securities would rise immediately. The housing market would stabilize and the banking system with it.

The $250 monthly payment would be made to all homeowners who pay the rest of their mortgage bill. It would help families and creat a strong incentive for them to pay their mortgages.

...

The cost would be manageable. There are roughly 40 million mortgages, accordinly the cost of this package would be $10 billion per month.

...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
The above is from a full-page ad in today's Journal from the CEO of Interactive Brokers.

A direct handout from taxpayers to pay peoples' mortgages is absurd. I bet some Democrats would support this idea, except that they would phase it out for the "rich" (people who actually pay taxes).

Unlike most Freepers, I support the Paulson plan, in part because I think mortgage-backed securities are selling at fire-sale prices and the government probably will make a profit even if it pays slightly higher prices.

1 posted on 10/03/2008 8:56:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Can someone from the government come by to wipe my rear end a few times per day?


2 posted on 10/03/2008 8:59:22 AM PDT by EyeGuy (Obama will deliver America on a Leash to an envious world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

“Wipe my butt!”

(It’s funnier in a Midwestern twang.)


3 posted on 10/03/2008 9:01:11 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“A direct handout from taxpayers to pay peoples’ mortgages is absurd.”

Why is this so absurd?


4 posted on 10/03/2008 9:01:33 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What about those of us who have paid off our mortgages? No one helped me do that. Do I still get the $250? What a crock.


5 posted on 10/03/2008 9:02:29 AM PDT by Heartland Mom (Those who would give up liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“It would help families and creat a strong incentive for them to pay their mortgages. “

Giving the stupid $250 a month won’t make them responsible

Giving the responsible but broke $25 a month does not pay the mortage or rent

What’s a 4 letter word for folks who cannot afford mortgage paymemts?

R-E-N-T


6 posted on 10/03/2008 9:02:34 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Didn’t they already pass a $300 billion bill to help homeowners in foreclosure? Did that money already turn into post-consumer lite beer?


7 posted on 10/03/2008 9:03:06 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If you’re gonna advocate stealing my money to give to deadbeats would you at least have the good grace to do it in person?


8 posted on 10/03/2008 9:05:48 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Why is Socialism absurd? Dude, you may be on the wrong forum.


9 posted on 10/03/2008 9:06:51 AM PDT by agere_contra (It's 'We the People', not 'We the Media')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Oh boy! Free money for everyone!


10 posted on 10/03/2008 9:13:34 AM PDT by AmericanHunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The cost would be manageable. There are roughly 40 million mortgages, accordinly the cost of this package would be $10 billion per month.

How do you keep it down to 40 million current mortgages?

Financially it would make sense for every homeowner without a mortgage to immediately take out a mortgage with a $250/month payment. The government would pay all of it and the homeowner can earn interest on the money removed from the mortgage.

11 posted on 10/03/2008 9:17:15 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The $700B bail out is giving parachutes to bankers while we must keep our seat belts on and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
-- How do you keep it down to 40 million current mortgages? --

Make the beneficiary qualify. A "date in effect" clause would get around your concern - i.e., to qualify, the note must be dated Sept 23, 2008 or before. Other qualifications could pertain, the most likely being a form of income or means testing.

The gap between working for a living, and just taking the handout is getting smaller and smaller. The harder you work, the more they take. The less you work, the more they give.

12 posted on 10/03/2008 9:21:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

None of those peopls should be considered home owners, they are real estate squatters, throw them out.

No one is entitled to a home unless they pay for it.


13 posted on 10/03/2008 9:31:34 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
While I do not agree with such socialism.

Isn't it better to spend the $$ bailing out the people who were duped by the banks into believing they could afford these loans, than to bail out the banks, CEOs, and Wall Street fat cats?

I am against the bailout completely, but it seems as if it is going to happen no matter what we say or do....If so, I'd rather bail out struggling people that rich CEOs and the like.

14 posted on 10/03/2008 9:33:59 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Some days it is not worth chewing through the restraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“The harder you work, the more they take. The less you work, the more they give.”

Eliminate all handouts for all reasons, food housing, or health care, none of which anyone is entitled to unless they pay for them.


15 posted on 10/03/2008 9:36:36 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“What’s a 4 letter word for folks who cannot afford mortgage paymemts?

R-E-N-T”

And what makes you think that they’ll pay the rent either?

Believe me, they won’t :(


16 posted on 10/03/2008 9:52:06 AM PDT by Mrs. Ranger (lamenting the death of "common sense")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Why do you think it’s not absurd? Do you think that, maybe, just maybe, people who enter contracts to buy houses should honor the contracts and pay their bills? Do you think that, maybe, just maybe, the Constitution doesn’t authorize the Federal government to steal from the taxpayers to pay other folks’ mortgages?


17 posted on 10/03/2008 10:14:05 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson