Skip to comments.Berg Confident Obama & DNC Motion To Dismiss Will Be Defeated
Posted on 10/03/2008 1:15:57 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania 09/29/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obamas lack of qualifications to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he filed his Opposition and Brief to Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] Joint Motion to Dismiss in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg feels confident that he has Standing and the Court will allow the case to go forward. Our response was due in 14 days, but the Court requested our answer by Monday, September 29, 2008 and we complied. In our response we set forth sufficient reasons that I have Standing to bring this lawsuit. Furthermore, I set forth additional reasons that indicate Obama does not meet the qualifications for President of the United States and Obama should be removed from the ballot and held accountable.
Because Obama is hiding something important.
I actually think it's more along the lines of "because he can't."
BETWEEN THE ILLEGAL DONATIONS AND THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE
MAYBE TIME TO FREEP THE FEC
How to Contact the Office of Inspector General:
1-202-694-1015 Federal Election Commission
1-800-424-9530 Office of Inspector General
Fax 999 E Street, NW
1-202-501-8134 Room 940
E-mail Washington, DC 20463
How to Contact the Federal Election Commission:
1-800-424-9530 Federal Election Commission
1-202-694-1100 (Washington, DC) 999 E Street, NW
1-202-219-3336 (Hearing Impaired) Washington, DC 20463
I'm no lawyer, but this seems like a no-brainer to me. Any US citizen has "standing" to ensure the next President of the United States meets the most basic qualifications.
“To the people who say this is a non-issue: Why doesn’t Obama simply turn over the documents and make Berg look like a fool?”
Because when you are fighting a fool you don’t give them an audience or a venue.
Name ONE short legal case!
Once a court case gets going, they can last for decades.
This man does not have standing.
All 0bama has to do is produce the real, original documents and this all goes away before the next news cycle at sunrise.
It was pretty smart to file a lawsuit, since they were forced to issue a ‘motion to dismiss’ when it would be easier to produce the document if they had the document.
Who does have standing? How else do the people of this country if but through the courts go about determining if a given candidate is constitutionally qualified to be president since the media obviously won't do their job.
It seems cut and dry. How come he won’t prove himself?
Don’t we, as U.S. citizens, have the right to DEMAND the proof that Barack Obama meets the qualifications? If a court dismisses it, don’t we still have the right to know?
Maybe I need to get out the Constitution and look this up myself, but who exactly oversees and appproves that a candidate meets qualifications?
We ALL need to write to or call the election commission and demand that this be resolved immediately.
My kids need an original, valid birth certificate to play township soccer, for goodness’ sake! Is it really possible that the election commission doesn’t require this in order to run for president?
I agree with Azzurri—every citizen would be hurt if Obama truly has no right to be President! We are supposed to be a nation of laws under the Constitution.
This just in — confirmed!.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/di ... 281573/13/
Obama’s Motion to Dismiss Berg’s lawsuit denied! This is the text of the Order:
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, : Plaintiff : vs. :CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083 : BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, : Defendants :
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEES MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)
THIS CAUSE came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R. Barclay Surrick on Defendants Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National Committees Motion to Dismiss. Having reviewed the Motion and Plaintiffs Opposition to said Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is DENIED.
It is further ORDER of this Court that the following discovery is to be turned over to Plaintiff within three (3) days:
1. Obamas “vault” version (certified copy of his “original” long version) Birth Certificate; and
2. A certified copy of Obamas Certification of Citizenship;
3. A Certified copy of Obamas Oath of Allegiance.
IT IS SO ORDERED
The Obama File
PING!!! to post #15
First link no work.
I checked PACER (online access to the filing in civil and criminal cases), and there was no order from the Court as of this morning.
This is the text of the proposed order for the judge, provided by Berg. It has not been signed by the judge.
Thanks I just dropped an email to FEC
“Can you tell me why a child must have a birth certificate to enter school or play sports and yet Obama is not requested by the FEC to provide an original certificate to run for President of the US? It didnt seem such an issue until one sees the length he will go to in order to fight Bergs suit to have it released. What is being hidden here? Americans hold the FEC responsible to see that the Constitutional requirements are met and that has not been done. Every American will be seriously hurt by this not being settled before there is a Constitutional crisis. This leaves a black mark on the FEC and a cloud over this election. Please address this issue.”