Replies

I understand that Philip Berg prepared that document for the judge to sign, and the judge has not signed it yet. So apparently the judge is still considering.

Here’s another interesting thread

http://www.americasright.com/2008/10/temporary-berg-v-obama-update.html

From the link GOP provided the following is quite interesting and quite consistent with 0’s MO.

Part of Obama’s legal team is Joe Sandler of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young. Sandler is part of the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR is an organization with terrorist ties, and is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holyland Foundation Hamas Funding trial.

Why is a candidate for President of the United States, a person who would become Commander-in-Chief of the United States forces and also CIC in the war on terror if he wins the election, using an attorney for CAIR, a group with known terrorist connections, to represent him in this lawsuit? Once again Obama leaves us with questions and no answers. And, once again, he aligns himself with someone with questionable character. Is his judgment really that bad? Or does he believe and support the same things these people believe?

Again, there is SO much we do not know about Obama, which is disturbing in itself. Even more disturbing is what we DO know about him. There are SO many red flags that people refuse to see or explore or think about or question him about. I am sure Obama supporters will just dismiss this, as they did with so many other bad associations, (Wright, Ayers, Dorhn, Rezko, Farrakhan) but I have to question what these people are thinking or whether they are even thinking at all?!