Posted on 10/05/2008 6:21:45 AM PDT by vietvet67
Another concern is how such a sizeable portion of America can entrust our national security to someone like Obama.
Protection of our country and families is supposed to be job #1. All other matters follow this requirement.
Obama supporters are blinded by their hatred of President Bush and placing all others, including themselves, in extreme danger. I pray some of them awake..
My question, precisely, is: Why are you applying a race/ethnic card to the story?
That is similar to the left’s distortion of the term ‘neo-con’ to isolate conservative Jews. It is a leftist tactic. Divide, divide, divide.
Why would that be? Is there not a generation of me-first, materialistic socialists who dominate the present culture in Hollywood, Wall Street and government?
You imply that only WASPs were on Wall Street before the baby boomers came along. Lehman Bros, founded by Jews, was around very successfully for well over 100 years. Boomers had nothing to do with its success and everything to do with its failure. It was Jewish businesssmen, in fact, who largely financed the American Revolution. Jews are not a new ethnic group to Wall Street.
It is not ethnicity nor race that has spawned the current culture, it is an ideology that detests all that America has traditionally represented. It is the ‘elite’ of the boomer generation that set out to destroy the traditional American culture, and who largely succeeded in that endeavor. And it is their kids’ generation who will be left to clean up their mess.
We must relearn from our 'Greatest Generation' while they are still with us what it takes to be free.
The Bommers were in the streets agitating for our defeat (e.g. Chicago 1968). Weak kneed politicians in the Dim party caved into their demands.
It was the generation of Baby Boomers on the college campus that caused the defeat.
We were defeated politically at home not on the battle field.
The only blame you can place on the 'Greatest Generation' is in their over indulgence of the 'Boomers'.
“Boomer Elite”
What a great description.
The phrase should be used to good advantage.
If so then don't do the same with generations.
He nicely placed the blame on the Boomer Elite.
You seem to have missed the main point. No one is talking about the entire generation, merely the ‘elite’ of the generation.
I think I just seen "nuanced," in action.
“Boomer Elite ideal is a sort of Directorate in the political system and economy, moral anarchy in personal conduct, and a quasi-totalitarian PC regime in societal relations”-Never thought of it that way, but now that I do I realize it’s true, and I hate ALL Three!
You don’t have to read the article. But if you do, you might notice the second sentence that sets this out rather clearly, not nuanced in the least.
Good point: I’m not a boomer (somewhere inbetween X-and Mellinial born 1980), however our nation has evil in all generations and WE must fight it (plus I know many in parents gen that have been on the right side of many issues, of course some of them have been manipulated into not going far enough because of the culture we live in).
Good point CA.
decimon, point taken. The greatest generation is my parents' generation, and they are generally hard working and decent folks. I would much rather be associated with them than many boomers I know.
Nope, we are not. But as a boomer, I despise almost without exception, the folks who have become the elite of our generation. Very few have risen by merit through the ranks of experience and hard knocks. They went to elite schools, then to congressional staffs or wall street, and never actually worked at anything where they had to practice useful skills.
That is why we are seeing our financial empire coming down around our ears, with enormous debt invested not in further productivity, but consumption and the excesses of an empire invented by another wonderful group of done - nothing boomers, the neocons.
Nope, we are not.
What you've quoted was written by Comparative Advantage. I agree with it, but if you want to argue the point you should address your comments to CA, not me.
Not trying to be disagreeable, I just know the direction generational threads normally take and I simply don't see the point.
Woodrow Wilson and his ilk sowed socialism (big bankers-The Fed), and other socialist utopian sh**, and they reaped Roosevelt and His massive power grab (and before he, the economy fell apart because of policies inflicted by Wilson and Company)!
As an Xer I too blamed the Boomers for along time, however I think it goes much deeper than one generation. The WWII generation fostered the sterile suburban environment a lot of Boomers grew up in brought on by their uber-materialistic world view fostered by the Great Depression. The WWII generation ushered in Roe v. Wade, Vietnam,the Great Society no-fault divorce, etc. It was not the boomers that oversaw these policy changes. However conservative boomers much acknowledge they lost major battles in the culture war ceding the fields of culture and education to the liberal “masters of the universe”. That gave us pc, affirmative action, etc.
Our civilization is withering on the vine and there is ample blame top go around. Think about it even “conservative Boomer leaders” have various ex wives and are corrupted by the culture as well. Every generation has its sins to atone for. I think the “Boomer We’re Just Great” bubble is bursting and it should.
In my old stalinist days we used to call the bourgeois communists. They want communism for everyone but themselves.
McCain is indeed a pre-boomer but Obama is not a post-boomer. Obama was born in 1961, the baby boom is defined as the years from 1946 to 1964. Obama is in fact a baby boomer.
And considering that in this country the youngers support the elders through a transfer of wealth, the folks sticking us with all this debt just might want to keep that in mind.
........................................................................................................................
That is one side of the story, the other side is, just look around and you will find plenty of gen x types already into their thirties and being supported by their parents. Some boomers are supporting their children AND their grandchildren!
I am pre-baby boom, I went straight into the Navy, I was signed up before I got my high school diploma. When I walked across the stage I was already on the payroll.
Young people who were not headed for college used to be expected to pull their own weight NO LATER than as soon as they finished high school. Most of those who lived with parents were working and contributing to family support. Most of those I know now seem to think they shouldn’t be expected to grow up before thirty five at the earliest. I know not all are that way but far too many are. We have not only extended the lifespan, we have doubled the age when we expect people to accept responsibility for their own lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.