This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 10/08/2008 4:09:07 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 10/08/2008 3:31:38 PM PDT by Huntress
CHICAGO (AP) - Residents of foreclosed properties in Chicago and other parts of Cook County don't have to worry about deputies forcing them out. Sheriff Tom Dart says that starting Thursday his office won't take part in evictions.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...
I don't think the sheriff will get very far with this stance, as it is the duty of the sheriff to enforce the orders of the court, including orders evicting tenant. Some lender will probably file a mandamus or other proceeding to compel the sheriff to do his duty.
That said, I am sympathetic to tenants in this situation. Often, the first notice tenants have that their rental has been foreclosed is when they are served with an eviction lawsuit by whoever purchased the property at the foreclosure sale (usually the lender). There are many good tenants who get evicted in this way through no fault of their own, because the lenders do not want to take the trouble to sort the good tenants from the bad ones or to be in the landlord business at all. Rather, they just want to unload the property ASAP, which is easier to do if it's vacant.
This communist has no concept of private property, does he?
That said, a typical foreclosing bank will continue to rent to a tenant, at least for a little while.
Many of the occupants that the Sheriff refuses to evict are the delinquent borrowers, not tenants. In fact, tenants are probably protected by a thirty-day notice requirement or the like... just as when a landlord wants possession of a rental property for whatever reason. They do deserve a fair notice period to enable them to move. The borrowers who just won’t move out, though... no sympathy at all for them.
Very true, and the sheriff is giving these deadbeats a free ride by adopting this policy. He is really overstepping his bounds here.
True, and lenders also are known to suspend foreclosure proceedings in late October / early November, picking up again after January 1st. They'd prefer not to see "Action Reporter" stuff on the evening news, about how the big mean bank is tossing people out on the street during the holiday season.
I have no problem with a little forebearance to avoid a PR problem, that's just good business sense. This Sheriff, however, is not empowered to ignore the courts or stick his nose into lenders' busness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.