Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COLIN POWELL'S ENDORSEMENT
boblonsberry.com ^ | 10/20/08 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 10/20/2008 6:43:05 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: IbJensen
" ... Bush surrounded himself with world socialists thereby guaranteeing his demise."


One hundred percent correct!


May his "compassionate conservatism" be a lesson to those who would offer an olive branch to their enemies.


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

41 posted on 10/20/2008 7:09:10 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama!

Here's his reasoning along with supporting evidence.
42 posted on 10/20/2008 7:09:15 AM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

“Next line: “because he is reaching out all across America.” That’s meaningless.”

0bama is reaching out with a club for anyone who disagrees.


43 posted on 10/20/2008 7:09:29 AM PDT by Need4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

LOL! Where did you find that?


44 posted on 10/20/2008 7:11:38 AM PDT by Sister_T (Sarah Palin can lead a horse to water AND make him drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I’d rather have Joe the Plumbers endorsement than powells .


45 posted on 10/20/2008 7:13:16 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 ((Socialism . . . a catalyst for apathy on the road to communism ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Colin Powell can support anybody he wants. That’s his right. Just as it’s our right to try to figure out why


I don’t think the Powell endorsement will sway many voters if any, thus why spend time trying to figure out why someone does things that in essence don’t matter.


46 posted on 10/20/2008 7:15:00 AM PDT by deport ( ----Cue Spooky Music---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Frankly, based upon what I have seen during this campaign season, I already assumed that most blacks will pull the lever for Obama because the fairytale ending is just too tempting.

I think it more newsworthy to hear about blacks who have decided NOT to vote for Obama, because they see through the marketing.


47 posted on 10/20/2008 7:17:23 AM PDT by delphirogatio (Obama: Narcissistic Personality Disorder on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I think the overriding factor is as he stated himself...
He doesn’t like Palin, primarily because of her expressed and obvious faith in God which translates to her strong pro-life stance.
I think the strongest underlying factor is Powell’s opportunistic desire to distance himself from being labeled a republican “uncle tom”.


48 posted on 10/20/2008 7:18:38 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionheart 247365

With the polls getting better for McCain after numerous elite pundits, Rino’s, terrorists, dictators and the MSM endorse Zero..it seems that they are all having an negative effect on the middle right of the public.
Powell is an opportunist. He will do anything to stay in the limelight. If McCain wins he will be back cuddling up and nice.


49 posted on 10/20/2008 7:19:06 AM PDT by Oldexpat (Drill Here, Drill There..we must drill everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Unwilling to Have First Black Presidential Loss Laid at His Door, Powell votes Race

From link: "Not wanting to have anyone say in the history books that he voted against Jackie “Obama” Robinson being the first black presidential player, Colin Powell has voted race. "

50 posted on 10/20/2008 7:23:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
IMO Colon Bowel(sic) endorsed Barry O'Bammy(sic) for one reason. To give the finger to Bush and the GOP for his firing (or not being re-hired) as SoS. If Hillary was the RAT nominee he'd have endorsed her too.

And outside the beltway, or the NYC cocktail circuit, who gives a rat's patoot what he thinks anyway.

51 posted on 10/20/2008 7:24:20 AM PDT by Condor51 (The only difference between Bill Ayers and Timothy McVeigh is the body count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

How a US General can endorse someone who has had relations with a terrorist either shows that he is a traitor himself going against the oath he took to our country OR he is a racist. Has to be one or the other.


52 posted on 10/20/2008 7:27:02 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/17/powell-surge/

Interesting link with video......
Powell stood in opposition to the surge.......
If McCain wanted to he could state “Although I respect General Powell, he was against the surge.......yet the surge, which I supported, was successful”


53 posted on 10/20/2008 7:27:26 AM PDT by caffe (please, no more consensus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
That’s his right. Just as it’s our right to try to figure out why.

The Suntrade Institute will tell you why!

General Powell, as is John McCain, GWB, Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright, etc, are bona fide members of the Council on Foreign Relations. A "'powerful" (read arrogant) set of Washington DC - New York insiders, including major media owners, who operate to manipulate (read spin) the politics of the United States, to integrate it into the globalist community.

Anyone who thinks there is a philosophical division between a "Republican Party" and a "Democratic Party" is naive. That is now obvious.

The people of the United States could, and would, work, function, invest, sacrifice, build, and prosper, very well with the most laid back, conservative "President." But that is NOT what is going on.

Read the Suntrade Institute's tagline.

There are indeed two types of people in the world: the Bicamerals, those who need to function in a topdown authoritative world, where direction is given centrally and by extortion. This IS the Left. And those who function through their own internal consciousness of self responsibility and moral balance. This is what religion, especially Christianity is all about. This is WHY the Soviet Union outlawed it.

This schism of mass human psychology (bicameral or conscious), is clearly explained in Jaynes' Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, but appears over and over in the Greek philosophers, Christ, Payne, HG Wells, Toynbee, Camus, and others.

The Council on Foreign Relations does NOT believe that human commerce can function through the individual's own moral, or social, balance, but must rather be "handled." That is what the current politics in the United States is about.

Sarah Palin for instance is clearly someone whose life strategy they disdain.

Simply-put Conservatism is human commerce functioning through the responsibility and courage of the individual, Leftism is mass manipulation because of the lack of faith in that option, hence the arrogance of the Ivy league set.

How obvious is it?

We are truly going the wrong way. To Johnny Suntrade, Jay Rockefeller is a mentally sick individual, as are many others.

You have heard this from the Suntrade Institute, not the Brookings Institution, not the CFR, not the DNC, not the GOP, not the Harvard School of Government.

54 posted on 10/20/2008 7:28:51 AM PDT by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
OneCitizenSpeaking.com, Sept. 20, 2008, has a "cut to the chase" rundown on Powell joins Obama in his:
COLIN POWELL: Why I don't agree with his Obama endorsement column.

http://www.onecitizenspeaking.com/ seems a good reference blog, takes the time for in depth analysis and a useful link to timely videos.


55 posted on 10/20/2008 7:32:31 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

” Powell is not a descendant of slaves (he’s Caribbean)”

—WHAT?!?!?


56 posted on 10/20/2008 7:33:04 AM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged

I believe his parents are from Jamaica, although he was born in New York.


57 posted on 10/20/2008 7:36:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

The only thing his endorsement means is that Colon (yes I spelled it right) Powell IS the affermative action moron we all knew he was all along.

Over promoted due to his race, and finally obviously NOT for his intelligence.

There is a difference between book smart (which he is) and intelligent thinker (obviously is NOT)


58 posted on 10/20/2008 7:36:30 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delphirogatio

“I think it more newsworthy to hear about blacks who have decided NOT to vote for Obama, because they see through the marketing.”

They are true blue principled conservatives.

They know that freedom is at stake.

Powell has been drinking DC bathwater too long.


59 posted on 10/20/2008 7:38:07 AM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

If my email is any indication from military I know “not setting too well in some circles” is an understatement!

My inbox for my email is pretty singed right now. Someone reminded me that Air Force Chief of Staff Merrill McPeak came to head the AF under Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. McPeak was a kneepadder for Clinton from the beginning and fired Air Force members who said anything against Clinton in public.


60 posted on 10/20/2008 7:38:12 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson