Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interview with Sarah Palin Immigration, latino vote, Irak, Obama (Univision)
Univision.com ^ | 22 October 08 | Jorge Ramos

Posted on 10/22/2008 6:03:02 PM PDT by TADSLOS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: WalterSkinner

You could be correct about the reasons Mccain picked her. He could not have picked another RINO, that much was clear.

regardless, he will need to expose ALL of Obama’s history if he wants to win. Arguing about taxes is not going to do it.


81 posted on 10/23/2008 7:50:32 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
Your (y'all) support of these RINOs instead of principle seals our doom.

Okay, so McCain is not Conservative. I think we know that and McCain has not gotten much support around FR for YEARS! But there is NOTHING good about Obama. Nothing! If Obama wins, I for one am not looking forward to experiencing Socialism and I am not looking forward to correcting all that an Obama Administration will ruin. The effects of an Obama Administration will be felt for at least a generation. Just look at how we are still dealing with FDR's New Deal crap and LBJ's Great Society crap. I REALLY don't want to live through Obama's Great Messianic Transformation.
82 posted on 10/23/2008 7:53:37 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (MCCAIN/PALIN '08!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince; calcowgirl

>She has to say what she has to say for now just win the election.<

>What does that mean?<

>Are you saying she is lying just to win?<

She’s a politician and she wants to win. Outright lie, no I don’t think so. Flex and twist, probably.


83 posted on 10/23/2008 7:56:20 AM PDT by B4Ranch (I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that wants to gut our Second Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
Carter got us Reagan, BTW.

Yea, and Carter was a BLAST to live through. No thanks.
84 posted on 10/23/2008 7:58:36 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (MCCAIN/PALIN '08!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: pissant
..I think McCain and his surrogates have been pointing to Zero's radical alliances--perhaps not enough--I think we will see the heat really go up the last two weeks. We KNOW negative campaigning works.

I forgot to mention the polls

RCP averages are nonsense--as a matter of fact most of them are--right now.

We are seeing the effect of oversampling of Dems. I believe that the race is within 1 or 2 points. Everything has been trending toward McCain since he went on the attack in the last debate. Joe the Plumber (like Sarah) is gift from heaven. I'm catching some things in the wind here on FR that tell me that there is a dynamic at work in several battleground states that are under the radar.

I hope someone will be shadowing Zero in Hawaii to see if he actually is visiting his grandmother or scrambling to clean up the COLB issue--I still think that is the hand grenade that could blow up the whole thing...

85 posted on 10/23/2008 8:08:09 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

I’m not going to keep replying to these assertions. I’m a little busy trying to bring Obama down a notch or two. I detailed what a path to citizenship could look like. Read it and disagree if you like but I am not going to discuss it until November 5th when I can tare President McCain a new one on the subject


86 posted on 10/23/2008 8:16:00 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

They have mentioned ACORN and Ayers, but without the requisite intellectual force needed.

Has Mccain said that Ayers was still a radical, wiping his feet on the US flag when Obama palled around with him? Or did they mention the ringing endorsement of Ayer’s radical book dealing with Juveniles in 1997? Have they slammed the radical nature of the Ayers related ‘education’ groups that Ayers and Obama gave millions to as part of the Annenburg Challeng and the Woods foundation.

They also have not talked about his commie mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, his freak show of spiritual advisers and “good friends” James Meeks, Fr. Pfegler, and Jeremiah Wright. They have not brought up his connections (he had employees from) the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan. No mention of Rahsid Khalidi or Khalid al-Mansour or Edward Said. No mention of his missing transcripts and college thesis. No mention of his intimate ties to the New Party, etc, etc.


87 posted on 10/23/2008 8:18:15 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: pissant
..I agree that there are several more logs that they can add to the fire.

Believe it or not, Huck (yes, Huck) has been doing a really good job of hitting these things on his new Fox show. I have even been proud of the way Rudy has been using his prosecutor's skills in hammering these issues. He's probably lobbying for AG--but I'm suspicious by nature...

88 posted on 10/23/2008 8:23:59 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince
Go Back to sender No charges pressed You can return to the country once the border has been secured If you can prove employment for >= 6 months you don’t have to go back to sender for as long as you can prove employment (on a bi weekly basis). Once you can no longer prove employment (with the same employer) Go back to sender

Yep. Fits the definition of an Amnesty, at least according to most modern dictionaries.

89 posted on 10/23/2008 8:28:47 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince
,,, but I am not going to discuss it until November 5th when I can tare President McCain a new one on the subject

Good luck with that. (He has never listened to conservatives before.)
90 posted on 10/23/2008 8:29:56 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
Yea, and Carter was a BLAST to live through. No thanks.

I'm not saying we WANT Obama, but that if the worst happens, we can hope for something better in '12. If Palin is for amnesty as she states in this interview, perhaps a real conservative will come along. After 4 years of Dems ruining the country, people 'might' be smart enough to see the light.
91 posted on 10/23/2008 8:32:49 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
No politician states they are for amnesty any more. Even Bush and McCain use the PC term 'pathway to citizenship'. Just as Palin did.

Amazing, isn't it?

"I have never supported amnesty and never would."
John McCain, 2007 Presidential Debate, South Carolina

92 posted on 10/23/2008 8:45:45 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl

>>You can return to the country once the border has been secured<<

McCain’s idea of “the border has been secured” is: 2 Dem and 2 RINO border governors deem it to be “secure.”

I think it’s possible that Palin has not thought much about immigration, since it’s not much of a problem in the Great White North. She may not realize that backing McCain’s amnesty is likely to lose support for both her and McCain among us right wingers, an important part of her defenders.


93 posted on 10/23/2008 8:50:49 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
What do you think about Palin being for "a path to citizenship" (Like Bush, McCain, Obama)?

To me, it's sad that we can't even get a solid anti-shamnesty VP candidate in either major party. Nor in Bob Barr's party for that matter.

Palin could have responded with an evasive answer if she really disagreed with McCain on amnesty.

Link: Michelle Malkin thinks Juan Hernandez got to Palin

94 posted on 10/23/2008 9:09:20 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
I'm not saying we WANT Obama, but that if the worst happens, we can hope for something better in '12. If Palin is for amnesty as she states in this interview, perhaps a real conservative will come along. After 4 years of Dems ruining the country, people 'might' be smart enough to see the light.

Good luck with that. What she states is that she is for a plan for citizenship and to me, that means that she would like to see those who came in illegally to step to the back of the line. Seems like a pretty good idea to me. Despite the phrase "plan to citizenship", there are actually plans to citizenship that are good out there and they are NOT amnesty.
95 posted on 10/23/2008 9:26:33 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (MCCAIN/PALIN '08!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

>>Despite the phrase “plan to citizenship”, there are actually plans to citizenship that are good out there and they are NOT amnesty.<<

Such as?


96 posted on 10/23/2008 9:34:08 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

This is precisely why I didn’t particularly like the idea of hitching Palin to McCain’s bandwagon.

Any issues she hadn’t already formed a sound policy on in her own mind, would be subject to heavy influence by this rat bastard.

Palin is a good woman. That doesn’t mean good women cannot be turned. The longer she is saddled with McCain, the more issues she will begin to sound like him on.

This answer on illegal immigration was disgraceful.


97 posted on 10/23/2008 9:36:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

DING, DING, DING....

There you have it folks.

Just like I thought....Palin’s a.....well, I’m not ready for banning. Not just yet. Needlesstosay, she WON’T be setting MCSHAMNESTY straight on this issue!!


98 posted on 10/23/2008 10:54:03 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
What she states is that she is for a plan for citizenship and to me, that means that she would like to see those who came in illegally to step to the back of the line.

Perhaps that's what she meant - and if it includes going back to their country while waiting in line, that would be find. But McAmnesty's 'path to citizenship' meant those here illegals would get citizenship long before the law-abiding millions waiting overseas. So it's a phrase that can be twisted, since nobody these days is man enough to admit they are really for amnesty. I hope she is what we hope she is.
99 posted on 10/23/2008 11:03:31 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

lots of typos in that post....just typing too fas6t.


100 posted on 10/23/2008 11:04:16 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson