Skip to comments.
IBD/TIPP poll lead down to 2.8
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/Polls.aspx?id=309983953253118 ^
Posted on 10/27/2008 11:56:35 AM PDT by PaRep
IBD/TIPP Tracking Poll: Day Fifteen
Posted Monday, October 27, 2008
After seesawing between 3.2 and 3.9 points over the weekend, Obama's lead slipped to 2.8 Monday. Battleground also has Obama up 3, and other polls have tightened, including Rasmussen, Zogby and Gallup to 5. Some polls show swings in independents, but IBD/TIPP has them in a stable, 5-point range. Read more
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; breaking; electionpresident; ibd; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2008 11:56:35 AM PDT
by
PaRep
To: PaRep
2
posted on
10/27/2008 11:58:13 AM PDT
by
mwl8787
To: PaRep
McMentum!
If you factor in huge 0 leads in blue-blue states, this bides very well for McCuda in battlegrounds.
3
posted on
10/27/2008 11:58:42 AM PDT
by
LikeLight
(http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
To: PaRep
4
posted on
10/27/2008 11:59:44 AM PDT
by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and OBAMA IS A MARXIST)
To: LikeLight
Obama has yet to reach 50+ in this poll. Go McPalin!
5
posted on
10/27/2008 12:00:08 PM PDT
by
Galtoid
( .)
To: PaRep
Anybody have experience with Intrade? I’m thinking of taking a flyer. McCain’s way down there so if he pulls this off, there’s some money to be made.
6
posted on
10/27/2008 12:01:25 PM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
(Nepolean fries the idea powder)
To: LikeLight
Yes, that’s why he could win most of the battleground states.
7
posted on
10/27/2008 12:01:28 PM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(Without the Mainstream Media, the Left is Nothing.)
To: PaRep
Rush Limbaugh just said the dems have a very SLIGHT lead in early voting in California.
The press is trying to demoralize you and you should respond by taking two people to vote!!!
8
posted on
10/27/2008 12:01:48 PM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Sarah Palin is the reason compasses point North.)
To: Galtoid
And he never will. All those undecideds are going to break for McCain whether this week or in the voting booth.
9
posted on
10/27/2008 12:01:58 PM PDT
by
rom
(Keep Senator Government from Spreading YOUR Wealth! McCain/Palin '08!)
To: LikeLight
I’m keeping my eye on the numbers for the rural and suburban vote. His lead on the latter appears to be declining a bit, but if McCain can continue to lead those by double-digits (and if it holds in the actual results), the Obama supporters are going to be crying late next Tuesday night.
10
posted on
10/27/2008 12:03:43 PM PDT
by
VOR78
To: PaRep
11
posted on
10/27/2008 12:05:37 PM PDT
by
The G Man
(The NY Times did "great harm to the United States" - President George W. Bush 6/26/06)
To: Paine in the Neck
I bought too early on inTrade, but I dollar cost averaged on the downside and have McCain for an average of 27. That’s 27 cents to get a dollar. At under 13 cents now, McCain is a steal.
12
posted on
10/27/2008 12:07:51 PM PDT
by
Thickman
(Term limits are the answer.)
To: PaRep; tatown; jilliane
LOL, Looks like PaRep won today! :-)
I wasn't even in the running.
13
posted on
10/27/2008 12:16:26 PM PDT
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: justlurking
I just went to IBD web site & it was up LUCKY I GUESS !! LOL!!
14
posted on
10/27/2008 12:17:28 PM PDT
by
PaRep
To: VOR78
Im keeping my eye on the numbers for the rural and suburban vote. His lead on the latter appears to be declining a bit, but if McCain can continue to lead those by double-digits (and if it holds in the actual results), the Obama supporters are going to be crying late next Tuesday night.
YES. Obama has run essentially an 'urban' campaign. Well, more like an urban+colleges+blacks campaign. That's too narrow of a base to win a national election, in my opinion. When have the Dems not had those constituencies? The campaign is based simply on increasing the turnout from those groups. But at the cost of getting trounced by rural and suburban voters?
Gore and Kerry could at least keep the margin of loss among those groups relatively low. Now we have a Dem candidate who is outright hostile to these groups. This is why I think McCain will come through with a solid win next week. The leftist media takes the Kerry voters for granted and assumes that Obama will build upon it. That is foolish. Obama doesn't have all of the Kerry voters. There are plenty of disaffected Democrats who won't be voting for him, and most of them hail from the country and from the 'burbs. Finally, are we really to believe that a sizable number of Bush voters who at the time were voting for an allegedly arch-conservative president will now flip to voting for the most left-wing presidential candidate ever?
The Obama campaign really screwed up in this election. Early on Obama should have spent time establishing that he could relate to middle America. He could have spent a lot of time emphasizing that his Kansan grandparents had a profound impact on his life. His campaign should have been about how he was a candidate who represented America, from rural Kansas to inner-city Chicago, and that his dream was to further unify the country moving forward.
Instead, he opted to go for the hard base of his party, to represent a movement of racial grievances and urban, far left sensibilities. Now he's left with a rural and suburban electorate who just cannot relate to him. It's amazing how his campaign made this strategic error. Is there any doubt that a Hillary Clinton wouldn't be up a solid, real, 10 points in this campaign right now, with a very good showing of supporter among rural and suburban voters?
15
posted on
10/27/2008 12:19:57 PM PDT
by
Harry Wurzbach
(Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
To: Harry Wurzbach
edit: “...with a very good showing of support...”
16
posted on
10/27/2008 12:20:39 PM PDT
by
Harry Wurzbach
(Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
To: justlurking
17
posted on
10/27/2008 12:21:16 PM PDT
by
jilliane
To: PaRep
18
posted on
10/27/2008 12:21:56 PM PDT
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: elizabetty
dems have a very SLIGHT lead in early voting in California. and that's just in party identity... i know some California Dems who are voting for McCain...
19
posted on
10/27/2008 12:22:35 PM PDT
by
latina4dubya
( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
To: PaRep
Reposting from duplicate thread:
Weighted to 2006 turnout, I get O 47.0, M 44.8 a more historically correct turnout gives Obama a 46.7 to 45.2 lead.
What % of the undecideds need to break for McCain to tie it up? Just 59%, and Im estimating no less than 67% of the undecideds breaking for McCain, which would give him a 50.6 to 49.4 lead.
The methodology is simple, even simplistic. I take the poll’s response by party, in this case Republicans (McCain 88, Obama 6, Undecided 6), Democrats (Obama 87, McCain 9, Undecided 4), and Independents (Obama 44, McCain 39, Undecided 17). Then I multiply each of those numbers by what history says are reasonable party identification — in 2006, the actual turnout was 35/38/27 R/D/I; historically 36/38/26 is more common. I add the numbers together for each candidate, and that’s his share of the vote.
A spreadsheet helps. A lot.
One recent tweak is that I’ve added a separate calculation to project where the “undecided” vote will go, and then update the candidate totals accordingly. This is entirely dependent on guessing, and should be treated as such, but under the assumption that McCain gets the undecideds in a 2:1 ratio or better, he’s ahead, according to IBD (and ARG for that matter, but I don;t trust them).
20
posted on
10/27/2008 12:23:04 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
(If Obama promises to tax your neighbor to give to you, what's he promising your neighbor?)
To: justlurking
As everyone expected If they haven’t found a reason to vote for Obama by now they aren’t voting for him
21
posted on
10/27/2008 12:24:22 PM PDT
by
PaRep
To: PaRep
I think Obamas Birth certificate-citizenships problem.. and his odd secrecy.. may have started to have an effect. Although the mainstream media is not reporting it.. it is all over the internet and is gaining traction..
To: PaRep
I wonder how the DUmmies are reacting to this poll?
To: outlawjake
Interesting you mention that....I thought it was just some trumped up rumor. But the more he hides it, seals it, and doesn’t produce it...the more suspect I become.
To: Palin4ever
An outbreak of FUDGED Underwear I suspect
25
posted on
10/27/2008 12:30:16 PM PDT
by
PaRep
To: PaRep
Why is IBD concerned enough with the other polls to mention?
26
posted on
10/27/2008 12:33:58 PM PDT
by
jimmur281974
(No Way! No How! NOBAMA)
To: rom
My gut says that the current undecideds will break about 3-1 or 4-1 for McCain, which means he wins.
27
posted on
10/27/2008 12:34:48 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Obama who?)
To: kevkrom
If you compare yesterdays IBD poll and todays, the undecided voters seem to be shifting towards McCain. Someone told that the undecideds are actually decideds for McCain. Good news indeed. Better yet, the numbers that you see for Obama on the last poll will be the one he will be getting. If he is below 49 on the election night, it will be a landslide for McCain.
To: kevkrom; kesg; Chet 99; Perdogg; LS; HamiltonJay; impeachedrapist
Using Party Weighting from the 2004 Exit Polls (37R, 37D, 26I):
McCain-46%, Obama-45.8%, Undecided-8.2%
Keep in mind that the vast majority of the undecideds are going to move into the McCain column.
29
posted on
10/27/2008 12:39:04 PM PDT
by
tatown
To: MooseChic
McCain narrowed Obama’s lead among Jewish voters by 23 points in one day (69-18) to (61-33).
30
posted on
10/27/2008 12:39:51 PM PDT
by
techno
To: PaRep
Figuring big population states such as California and New York are heavily dimocRAT they will skew the national polls. The key is to watch the individual states and their polls.
To: Harry Wurzbach
i know who McCotter is, but who is Joe the Plumber. Have I missed something?
32
posted on
10/27/2008 12:43:20 PM PDT
by
shaft29
(Just your typical black woman.)
To: MooseChic
When people get an unexpected call from a pollster, it takes them a little while to start tracking.
They, in fact, might not be sure if it's a poll, a push-poll or an overt campaign call, by the time the questioning begins.
Hence, just to make sure they don't subject themselves to a bunch of partisan crap, some McCain voters simply say, “Undecided.”
33
posted on
10/27/2008 12:43:28 PM PDT
by
Cedric
To: Cedric
I recommend poll callers be told, “I see the voting booth sort of like some see a trip to Vegas, what happens there stays there. MYOB”
34
posted on
10/27/2008 12:46:55 PM PDT
by
kalee
To: PaRep
Overall, positive trends.
Good news:
- Undecideds are gradually moving to McCain. Obama's 47% equals his previous peak on 10/18. McCain's 44% is +4% vs 10/18. Undecideds are -4% vs 10/18. A point for point shift to McCain.
- Married women were +12 for McCain.
- McCain's up big with suburban and rural voters, with 14% of suburban voters undecided.
Puzzling results:
- Obama is still even with McCain among Catholics, despite being the most radically pro-abortion candidate in history.
- 20% of self-identified conservatives prefer an obvious neo-Com.
35
posted on
10/27/2008 12:47:28 PM PDT
by
bailmeout
("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" - G Orwell)
To: Cedric
10/27 44.2% 47.0% 8.8% Obama +2.8
10/26 43.3% 46.5% 10.1% Obama +3.2
10/25 41.9% 45.8% 12.2% Obama +3.9
10/24 42.3% 45.8% 11.9% Obama +3.5
10/23 43.7% 44.8% 11.6% Obama +1.1
10/22 42.0% 45.7% 12.3% Obama +3.7
10/21 40.9% 46.9% 12.1% Obama +6.0
10/20 41.4% 46.7% 11.9% Obama +5.3
10/19 41.5% 46.6% 11.9% Obama +5.1
10/18 39.8% 47.2% 13.0% Obama +7.3
10/17 40.6% 45.9% 13.5% Obama +5.3
10/16 41.6% 45.2% 13.2% Obama +3.6
10/15 41.9% 45.2% 12.9% Obama +3.3
10/14 41.9% 44.8% 13.3% Obama +3.0
10/13 42.7% 44.8% 12.5% Obama +2.1
(This chart is below the cross-tabs available at the IBD paged the poster linked to.)
Check out what's happened since 10/17, when the number of undecideds peaked at 13.5%. Today, the undecided figure is at 8.8%, a difference of 4.7%.
And of that 4.7, McCain has taken 3.6, moving from 40.6 on 10/17 to 44.2 today. Obama, for his part, has taken a measley 1.1, moving from 45.9 on 10/17 to 47 today.
Conclusion: Undecideds are breaking for McCain at a rate of 3.6/4.7, which = 77 percent.
If this trend continues, McCain will get about 6.7 of the remaining 8.8 undecideds, which would = 50.9 percent of the total vote.
36
posted on
10/27/2008 12:51:25 PM PDT
by
BCrago66
To: bailmeout
Also McCain gained 23 points with Jewish voters in one day in relation to Obama.
37
posted on
10/27/2008 12:52:40 PM PDT
by
techno
To: Thickman
i thought he was a steal at 20. Down to 12.5, that’s a HUGE buy!
To: PaRep
What all these polls tighten further this week as the 2001 radio interview is spread (and commercials are made from it).
I predict a dead heat by Friday.
39
posted on
10/27/2008 12:57:51 PM PDT
by
TMA62
(TMA62)
To: techno
Considering the sample size, that may have come from two respondents.
40
posted on
10/27/2008 1:00:37 PM PDT
by
Chet 99
(Vote McCain/Palin, or this will be our future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTb5EFZmgbs)
To: BCrago66
You beat me to the punch. I was just figuring this out based on the highest uncommitted numbers to the numbers we have today. My analysis is almost exactly the same as yours, showing McCain takes 6.6 of the remaining undecideds giving him the win. This follows with the trend since 10/17.
41
posted on
10/27/2008 1:10:20 PM PDT
by
Beeman
To: TMA62
With the new video, Joe the Plumber, and the new Wright ads, McCain will likely be leading in this poll by Friday.
42
posted on
10/27/2008 1:11:38 PM PDT
by
Beeman
To: PaRep
Nothing likely scares a campaign more than seeing the polls begin to tighten a week before the election. At this stage people are beginning to think about who they will vote for and it is trending toward McCain.
43
posted on
10/27/2008 1:15:57 PM PDT
by
yazoo
To: PaRep
44
posted on
10/27/2008 1:21:11 PM PDT
by
Names Ash Housewares
(Refusing to kneel before the polling gods and whimper. FIGHT!)
To: Names Ash Housewares
McCain is 2.8 back via IBD/TIPP and 3% via Battleground; instead of CNN reporting that the race is tightening all they’re focused on now so late in the camapign is asking questions if John Mccain made the right pick in choosing Sarah and that she is now a ‘diva’ acting as if diva is equivalent to Marxist, racist, or traitor.
45
posted on
10/27/2008 1:33:58 PM PDT
by
techno
To: techno
46
posted on
10/27/2008 2:03:25 PM PDT
by
wolf24
("It's always easy to rally the stupid.")
To: techno
Jewish & Cuban voters understand the meaning of socialism and the significance of the local TV station being punished for asking questions.
47
posted on
10/27/2008 2:12:29 PM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Acorn, Africa,Alinsky, Ayers,....BroadwayBank,Bastard child,Birthcert......now to the "C"s ;-))
To: RockinRight
I don't get these “undecideds”, but when I can't decide on something in general, I go for the safest bet. Obama the “change” guy, is not going to be the safest bet. McCain will win this.
48
posted on
10/27/2008 2:15:17 PM PDT
by
VA40
To: Beeman
Cool. If your result is similar to mine, that’s evidence that I didn’t screw up :-)
49
posted on
10/27/2008 2:28:10 PM PDT
by
BCrago66
To: Fred
50
posted on
10/27/2008 2:29:21 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(I am a bitter clinger!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson