Skip to comments.
Utah Democrat AG Candidate Says Polygamy Must be Allowed Based on Repeal of Sodomy Law
LifeSiteNews ^
| 10/28/08
| Thaddeus M. Baklinski
Posted on 10/28/2008 4:02:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: patriot preacher
21
posted on
10/28/2008 5:04:40 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(I'm Joe the Plumber! I can flush the system of the Obama crap!)
To: colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; svcw; Enosh; ...
22
posted on
10/28/2008 5:08:45 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(I'm Joe the Plumber! I can flush the system of the Obama crap!)
To: greyfoxx39
When the Lawrence decision was issued, many of us warned this was the next natural step the degenerates of America would take. Sex with animlas would seem to be on the horizon for ‘legality’.
23
posted on
10/28/2008 5:41:44 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: wagglebee
Here we GO!
24
posted on
10/28/2008 6:16:00 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Morgana
25
posted on
10/28/2008 6:16:37 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Saundra Duffy
You might be interested in THIS thread.
26
posted on
10/28/2008 6:17:53 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Zakeet
We knew this would be the next step after the Texas decision, surprised it took this long.
27
posted on
10/28/2008 7:35:32 PM PDT
by
Godzilla
(I am JOE. NO Socialism, NO Obama. I'd rather keep my change and spread it around myself.)
To: stylin19a
Utah is one of the states that defines marriage as 1 man and 1 woman by constitutional amendment. So wouldn’t that constitutional definition override tying plural marriage to repeal of sodomy laws?
To: wagglebee
What will the legal status be of a polygamous necrophiliac?
29
posted on
10/28/2008 9:24:01 PM PDT
by
A6M3
To: Dilbert San Diego
Utah is one of the states that a bunch of elected folks got together to defines marriage as 1 man and 1 woman by constitutional amendment.
30
posted on
10/29/2008 5:36:59 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: wagglebee
I think polygamy would be a lot easier to accept then a couple of queers getting married and being allowed to take possession of children. The bigger issue is what queers do to children once they have possession.
31
posted on
10/29/2008 6:12:45 AM PDT
by
Neoliberalnot
((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
To: Elsie
I thought the people of Utah voted on a constitutional amendment on marriage? I think it was a few years ago? About 66% approved it?
Anyway, I just thought if they do have a marriage amendment that would over ride any lower court, or any regular law that was allowing polygamy to be legal.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson